Trump 2.0: MAGAA

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

Charge them with criminal trespass and throw them in solitary confinement just like the J6ers.

FAFO

[BDKJMU]

And the dipshit donk Congressman Ro Khana was wrong. They weren‘t protesting OUTSIDE an ICE facility. They snuck their way INSIDE an ICE facility.

[UNI88]

And the dipshit donk Congressman Ro Khana was wrong. They weren‘t protesting OUTSIDE an ICE facility. They snuck their way INSIDE an ICE facility.

Is this the same Congressman brad gill who circulated a petition to deport Congresswoman omar? “In America you cannot arrest your political opponents” but you can deport them?

Talk about a hypocrites whose outrage is fake.

[BDKJMU]

And the dipshit donk Congressman Ro Khana was wrong. They weren‘t protesting OUTSIDE an ICE facility. They snuck their way INSIDE an ICE facility.

Is this the same Congressman brad gill who circulated a petition to deport Congresswoman omar? “In America you cannot arrest your political opponents” but you can deport them?

Talk about a hypocrites whose outrage is fake.

Yes the same Congressman who wants to help Omar realize her dream. Nothing hypocritical about that.

[BDKJMU]

[kalm]

Hmmm….seems to some dispute on that.

[BDKJMU]

Hmmm….seems to some dispute on that.

Lol she leaves out the ‘illegally‘ before entered.

On the video the ICE agents are literally trying to get to the lady in the cream colored jacket, and the mayor physically impedes them.

[BDKJMU]

This video shows even more. Rep McIver (red jacket) is clearly trying to obstruct the ICE officers from arresting the mayor, then she gets into a physical confrontation with them.

[UNI88]

Is this the same Congressman brad gill who circulated a petition to deport Congresswoman omar? “In America you cannot arrest your political opponents” but you can deport them?

Talk about a hypocrites whose outrage is fake.

Yes the same Congressman who wants to help Omar realize her dream. Nothing hypocritical about that.

You take everything anyone who doesn't worship trump says literally but get upset and say he's only trolling when people do that with trump's words.

You do realize that:
- dreaming of something doesn't mean someone actually wants to do it under current circumstances?
- there is a difference between voluntarily leaving the US (and being able to return) and being deported/

Using your logic we should deport trump to Italy to help him realize his dream of being Pope.

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

The War on Appliances has ended!

[kalm]

Discount Goebbels at it again.

. But then Stephen Miller went on television Friday afternoon and made some of the most remarkable (and remarkably scary) comments about federal courts that I think we’ve ever heard from a senior White House official. Reacting to a series of high-profile losses in immigration cases this week, Miller raised the specter of President Trump suspending habeas corpus:


Well, the Constitution is clear. And that, of course, is the supreme law of the land, that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in a time of invasion. So … that's an option we're actively looking at. Look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not. At the end of the day, Congress passed a body of law known as the Immigration Nationality Act which stripped Article III courts, that’s the judicial branch, of jurisdiction over immigration cases. So Congress actually passed what’s called jurisdiction stripping legislation. It passed a number of laws that say that the Article III courts aren't even allowed to be involved in immigration cases.

I know there’s a lot going on, and that Miller says lots of incendiary (and blatantly false) stuff. But this strikes me as raising the temperature to a whole new level—and thus meriting a brief explanation of all of the ways in which this statement is both (1) wrong; and (2) profoundly dangerous. Specifically, it seems worth making five basic points:

https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/148-susp ... medium=web

[BDKJMU]

[kalm]

Something something…times of rebellion and invasion.

So does this mean you would agree if SCOTUS ruled the suspension unconstitutional?

[kalm]

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

“Rest easy, Ma and Pa MAGA hat,” Kimmel snarked. “You’re still gonna lose the farm, but you’ll only have to pay 10% extra on that Rolls-Royce you’ve had your eye on.”

[BDKJMU]

Something something…times of rebellion and invasion.

So does this mean you would agree if SCOTUS ruled the suspension unconstitutional?

So does mean you would agree if Trump ignored SCOTUS as Lincoln did?

[BDKJMU]

How cute you think the UK trade deal was only about tariffs..

[BDKJMU]

Ha ha just like with Abrego Garcia, with the insurrectionist stunt the donks pulled at the ICE facility in NJ, democrats are

[kalm]

Ha ha just like with Abrego Garcia, with the insurrectionist stunt the donks pulled at the ICE facility in NJ, democrats are

Political strategy aside (and threatening rescissions for illegal actions isn’t bad) what points do you disagree with in Malinowski’s tweet? Would you feel the same if your were brown skinned?

[kalm]

Something something…times of rebellion and invasion.

So does this mean you would agree if SCOTUS ruled the suspension unconstitutional?

So does mean you would agree if Trump ignored SCOTUS as Lincoln did?

No. For starters, we’re not at war or under invasion.

[kalm]

Not bribery at all…..

[UNI88]

How cute you think the UK trade deal was only about tariffs..

The UK deal was about trump being desperate for a deal.

How cute you think the Canadian tariffs were about fentanyl.