Playoff projection thread

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
JBB
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4312
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by JBB »

Both are powerful offensive teams fairly well balanced but Furman leans toward the run, Austin Peay the Pass. Unfortunately for Furman they will bring their 276 yd/game running attack up against an 87 yd/game rushing defense. They have a much better chance throwing. The Austin Peay pass defense is a little suspect. Leading with the run Furman should set-up the pass and the win. The GAM forecasts a tight game with Furman the favorite.
Dear Lord, We come before you and humbly ask you to grant our prayer for a veil of protection to be placed over Donald Trump. May your will be done. In Jesus name we pray. Amen
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:WOW UND in
Why wow?
Had Towson not lost, they would not be in.
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote:Wow did Nova piss off somebody. @ SELA and then @ Montana if they win. :tothehand:
Nova never bids. Their own damned fault. Football is an afterthought there.
Yes, but they could have just as easily been sent to Monmouth and put Holy Cross (who really doesn't even deserve to be in) at SELA.
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by CID1990 »

Furmen won’t go far.

Whofferd is peaking and could be a semifinal team. They have really improved over the season.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69461
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Why wow?
Had Towson not lost, they would not be in.
The Towson with a similar strength of schedule but no wins against a ranked opponent, much less a seed?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Had Towson not lost, they would not be in.
The Towson with a similar strength of schedule but no wins against a ranked opponent, much less a seed?
Yes. Had TU beaten Elon they would have been in over UND. As it was, they were "first out".
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69461
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
The Towson with a similar strength of schedule but no wins against a ranked opponent, much less a seed?
Yes. Had TU beaten Elon they would have been in over UND. As it was, they were "first out".
Agreed. They were a lock at 8-4. But they didn’t beat Elon which makes UND easily ahead of them.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36633
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by BDKJMU »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
The Towson with a similar strength of schedule but no wins against a ranked opponent, much less a seed?
Yes. Had TU beaten Elon they would have been in over UND. As it was, they were "first out".
Correct. Had TU beaten Elon, TU would have been in & likely UND would have been out, with Furman the last team in. I'm surprised SELA wasn't listed in one of the last 4..

As it was TU was one of the 1st 4 out, but we don't know if they were the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th team out. I'm guessing the 1st team out was SIU, but with this committee, who the hell knows.

Last 4 in listed in alphabetical order:
FU
SIU
KSU
ND
First 4 out listed in alphabetical order:
-UNH
-SC State
-SIU
-TU
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36633
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by BDKJMU »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Yes. Had TU beaten Elon they would have been in over UND. As it was, they were "first out".
Agreed. They were a lock at 8-4. But they didn’t beat Elon which makes UND easily ahead of them.
Yep. If the last 4 in are #21-#24, I think TU beats ELon they're # 23-#24..If the 1st 4 out are #25-#28, I think losing to Elon dropped TU to #26-28
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:Image
IMO there is just a huge chasm between top 4 and the rest of the field. I'd actually be OK with a I-A four team format this year. The rest are just so mediocre.
Not really.
So three of the top four from early November are in the semis. Only #4 didn't advance. I feel somewhat vindicated. :ugeek:
Image
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 93henfan »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Not really.
So three of the top four from early November are in the semis. Only #4 didn't advance. I feel somewhat vindicated. :ugeek:
Right on. And we still have people saying 16 isn't enough. :lol:
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69461
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Not really.
So three of the top four from early November are in the semis. Only #4 didn't advance. I feel somewhat vindicated. :ugeek:
APSU fans got their first taste of playoff action. They want more and along with the increased exposure, recruiting success, and donations have a shot of elevating their programs which is good for an already improving brand. I’m sure the businesses that prospered in Clarksville and the book store weren’t complaining either.

32 will insure an even greater amount of new blood and perhaps some upsets and Cinderella’s.

:thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36633
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by BDKJMU »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: So three of the top four from early November are in the semis. Only #4 didn't advance. I feel somewhat vindicated. :ugeek:
APSU fans got their first taste of playoff action. They want more and along with the increased exposure, recruiting success, and donations have a shot of elevating their programs which is good for an already improving brand. I’m sure the businesses that prospered in Clarksville and the book store weren’t complaining either.

32 will insure an even greater amount of new blood and perhaps some upsets and Cinderella’s.

:thumb:
And going back to 20 (which could do now with only 10 AQ) would insure less garbage gets in. :thumb:

The only way 32 would even have a remote chance to happen would be if the SWAC, MEAC, and IVY ALL joined for playoffs as AQ conferences, which would require 13 AQ, minimum 26 teams. And even then a 26 team field would be more likely than 32 simply because of cost containment. 26 would be simple- 6 teams get a bye, 20 play 1st round, down to 16 2nd round.

Div II does 28. 4 teams get a bye, 24 play 1st round, 16 play 2nd round. The reason they do 28 instead if 32 is because of $$.
https://www.ncaa.com/brackets/print/football/d2/2019

Bottom line going back to 20, or going to 32, aren’t happening.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: So three of the top four from early November are in the semis. Only #4 didn't advance. I feel somewhat vindicated. :ugeek:
APSU fans got their first taste of playoff action. They want more and along with the increased exposure, recruiting success, and donations have a shot of elevating their programs which is good for an already improving brand. I’m sure the businesses that prospered in Clarksville and the book store weren’t complaining either.

32 will insure an even greater amount of new blood and perhaps some upsets and Cinderella’s.

:thumb:
Three of the top four from early November are in the semis. :coffee:
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by Gil Dobie »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
APSU fans got their first taste of playoff action. They want more and along with the increased exposure, recruiting success, and donations have a shot of elevating their programs which is good for an already improving brand. I’m sure the businesses that prospered in Clarksville and the book store weren’t complaining either.

32 will insure an even greater amount of new blood and perhaps some upsets and Cinderella’s.

:thumb:
Three of the top four from early November are in the semis. :coffee:
You could also say 3 of the top 10 from early November.
Last edited by Gil Dobie on Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69461
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
APSU fans got their first taste of playoff action. They want more and along with the increased exposure, recruiting success, and donations have a shot of elevating their programs which is good for an already improving brand. I’m sure the businesses that prospered in Clarksville and the book store weren’t complaining either.

32 will insure an even greater amount of new blood and perhaps some upsets and Cinderella’s.

:thumb:
Three of the top four from early November are in the semis. :coffee:
Yes, and?

You don’t have to care or watch the first 3 rounds if you’d like. Many of us do.

:coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Three of the top four from early November are in the semis. :coffee:
Yes, and?

You don’t have to care or watch the first 3 rounds if you’d like. Many of us do.

:coffee:
They're so compelling they're not even on TV.
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

Gil Dobie wrote:
89Hen wrote: Three of the top four from early November are in the semis. :coffee:
You could also say 3 of the top 10 from early November.
Or 3 of the top 124 (or however many there are now). Put in every team. :dunce:
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by Gil Dobie »

89Hen wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
You could also say 3 of the top 10 from early November.
Or 3 of the top 124 (or however many there are now). Put in every team. :dunce:
..and I was trying to stay on topic of the original 10. :lol:
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

Gil Dobie wrote:
89Hen wrote: Or 3 of the top 124 (or however many there are now). Put in every team. :dunce:
..and I was trying to stay on topic of the original 10. :lol:
Great!
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69461
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Yes, and?

You don’t have to care or watch the first 3 rounds if you’d like. Many of us do.

:coffee:
They're so compelling they're not even on TV.
Yeah...like I said...you don’t have watch them (they are streamed). It’s still better coverage than a decade ago.

“Dad...there’s only two channels and no MTV!
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:Yeah...like I said...you don’t have watch them
Not only that, I don't have to accept them as needed. :thumb:
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30870
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by UNI88 »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
Yes, and?

You don’t have to care or watch the first 3 rounds if you’d like. Many of us do.

:coffee:
They're so compelling they're not even on TV.
ESPN+ and ESPN3 are TV.

89Hen watching UD play ...

Image

"I'm not shaving until the Blue Hens win another national championship."
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by 89Hen »

UNI88 wrote:
89Hen wrote: They're so compelling they're not even on TV.
ESPN+ and ESPN3 are TV.
Negative.
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Playoff projection thread

Post by Ibanez »

89Hen wrote:
UNI88 wrote:
ESPN+ and ESPN3 are TV.
Negative.
How are those television channels not on TV?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Post Reply