That wasn’t my point. Trump lies constantly. But Republicans dont care. They care when a Democrat lies.SeattleGriz wrote:Yes, people care about how a 2 year investigation on Russia collusion started and ended up a big goose egg.Ibanez wrote: Yes, it’s ironic. Now they care about the truth? That’s comical.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw that. Biden should’ve known better. Idiot.SDHornet wrote:Orange Man probably provided the best response to this:Ibanez wrote:
I’ve not seen proof of that. If that were the case, and Republicans had the evidence, wouldn’t that be out for all of us to see for ourselves?
None of here has first hand information.
Let’s use some critically thinking skills here. Let’s try to think independently here and not just spout whatever CNN or Fox tells us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Hill's John Solomon provided a treasure trove of docs/info on the Biden's and Ukraine dealings. But yeah, no biggie.
On this, we agree. Pence would get slapped around.SDHornet wrote:Lol, yeah that's why Trump mud stomped the "conservative" candidate (Cruz) leading up to 2016.JohnStOnge wrote:
I disagree. If you look at polls and look at the breakdown among people who identify as "conservative" they approve of Trump overwhelmingly. Not quite as overwhelmingly as those who identify as "Republican." But overwhelmingly.
If ANY conservative approves of Trump there is a problem.
Hell, if there ever is anything to impeach Trump on (
Busted on what, BTK? I saw that last night.BDKJMU wrote:Lawl. BUSTED!SDHornet wrote: Orange Man probably provided the best response to this:
The Hill's John Solomon provided a treasure trove of docs/info on the Biden's and Ukraine dealings. But yeah, no biggie.
You really hate common core, don’t you?JBB wrote:********POLITICAL ANNOUNCEMENT********
ST ONGE REVEALS HUGE CONSPIRACY THEORY, APPLAUDED BY NON PLAYABLE CHARACTERS
COMMOM CORE IDIOT ATTEMPTS TO TALK POLITICS. DOES NOT ATTEMPT MATH
Bla, bla, bla. A half page of common core nonesense relying on the New York Times for information!JohnStOnge wrote: You know, I actually came here just now to talk about how I heard a Republican Congressman relay false information today to a NPR interviewer when he said that the New York Times said the whistleblower met with Schiff ahead of time and that Schiff was involved in crafting the complaint.
I heard it while I was on a 10 hour drive today. I got to my hotel room and almost as soon as I turned on the TV I knew that it was a false claim. I got on line and looked up the New York Times story. By the time I found it at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/us/p ... lower.html they'd had to add some things about how Trump was making false claims about their story. I'm guessing the Congressman saw Trump make the false claims and took it from there. Apparently the Congressman wasn't the only one.
The New York Times did not say Schiff met with the whistleblower. It did not say Schiff was involved in crafting the complaint. It said the whistlblower spoke to a House Intelligence Committee staffer about how to handle the situation and the House Intelligence Committee staffer provided instructions as to how to do it consistent with the law. And the staffer recommended the whistleblower get an attorney.
This is getting really bad. Trump operates through misinformation and he's apparently corrupted the entire conservative movement so that it does the same thing.
Wake up css75. You are being lied to. Repeatedly. You are riding the wrong horse.
I am telling you that as an ultra conservative who recognized what Trump is very early on. I'm not telling you because I am a liberal. You are going down the wrong path. This is not a good guy. He is corrupting the entire movement and he's corrupting the Republican Party.
You common core babies were never educated. You were indoctrinated to be idiot servants of the corrupt deep state.
Wow. I remember doing that at Blessed Sacrament.CID1990 wrote:You do know when JSO went to school they were still whacking erasers against a tree outside, rightJBB wrote:********POLITICAL ANNOUNCEMENT********
ST ONGE REVEALS HUGE CONSPIRACY THEORY, APPLAUDED BY NON PLAYABLE CHARACTERS
COMMOM CORE IDIOT ATTEMPTS TO TALK POLITICS. DOES NOT ATTEMPT MATH
Bla, bla, bla. A half page of common core nonesense relying on the New York Times for information!
You common core babies were never educated. You were indoctrinated to be idiot servants of the corrupt deep state.
(I did too BTW)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is a valid point. I guess being that the Hearsay has been verified by Trump and the White House, it may not matter. Ivy, can I get a ruling? Also, what if the people with first hand info come forward? The whistle blower has first hand knowledge of some things which hasn’t been made public, I’d be interested in hearing that.JBB wrote:Do some mathkalm wrote:
Not to mention it was css75 (a Trump supporter) that first posted the NYT piece that JSO was quoting. I pasted the salient points from the article showing why there’s not much there. css75 continues to run with it Flaggy hopes the whistle blower gets shot, and JBB thinks he’s stumbled across the ultimate burn.
Wheeeeeeee!!!
Explain the difference between hearsay and first hand.
Which is allowed to be submitted in court as evidence?
Which is not?
Hearsay is an out-of-Court statement (oral or written) that is offered to prove the truth of its contents. What is or is not hearsay, as well as the numerous exceptions to the rule, are governed by the rules of evidence. See, for example, Federal Rules of Evidence 801-807. And, no, I haven’t had the time or the desire to parse the whistleblower letter on this basis.Ibanez wrote:That is a valid point. I guess being that the Hearsay has been verified by Trump and the White House, it may not matter. Ivy, can I get a ruling? Also, what if the people with first hand info come forward? The whistle blower has first hand knowledge of some things which hasn’t been made public, I’d be interested in hearing that.JBB wrote:
Do some math
Explain the difference between hearsay and first hand.
Which is allowed to be submitted in court as evidence?
Which is not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I never posted the NYT article, as I would never post anything from that bird cage bottom. I only mentioned they reported on Schiff because posting something accurate is very unusual for them.kalm wrote:Not to mention it was css75 (a Trump supporter) that first posted the NYT piece that JSO was quoting. I pasted the salient points from the article showing why there’s not much there. css75 continues to run with it Flaggy hopes the whistle blower gets shot, and JBB thinks he’s stumbled across the ultimate burn.∞∞∞ wrote:I'm pretty confused about JBB's "Common Core" reference every other post.
It started in 2010. Has one person on this board been educated with Common Core standards?
Wheeeeeeee!!!
So they break a story and you just KNOW they’ve got it right this time?css75 wrote:I never posted the NYT article, as I would never post anything from that bird cage bottom. I only mentioned they reported on Schiff because posting something accurate is very unusual for them.kalm wrote:
Not to mention it was css75 (a Trump supporter) that first posted the NYT piece that JSO was quoting. I pasted the salient points from the article showing why there’s not much there. css75 continues to run with it Flaggy hopes the whistle blower gets shot, and JBB thinks he’s stumbled across the ultimate burn.
Wheeeeeeee!!!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Good for Tim. We don’t deserve himIbanez wrote:You think those two give a damn?CID1990 wrote:
Why? My take is that the guy first went to a Congressional staffer to try to figure out where to go with it. That’s not inappropriate. Was Schiff’s staffer appropriate? We don’t know. Maybe the whistleblower is Schiff’s constituent.
Going to Congress is an appropriate action though. If I were a whistleblower at State, I’d probably go to either the SFRC or Tim Scott or Lindsey
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Btw- Scott is leaving the Senate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or the 1920s when JSO was doing the Charleston with his best squeezeIbanez wrote:Wow. I remember doing that at Blessed Sacrament.CID1990 wrote:
You do know when JSO went to school they were still whacking erasers against a tree outside, right
(I did too BTW)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And to Trips point - yeah, nobody here was educated under common core. We didn’t have that in the 90s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's just aces.CID1990 wrote:Or the 1920s when JSO was doing the Charleston with his best squeezeIbanez wrote: Wow. I remember doing that at Blessed Sacrament.
And to Trips point - yeah, nobody here was educated under common core. We didn’t have that in the 90s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(She was the bee’s knees)
Please keep UND out of this......kalm wrote:I’m sure there are.HI54UNI wrote:
Actually there are case studies that have proved that good schools can overcome those issues.
You’ll have to forgive JBB. His UND education limits his understanding.
Truer words were never spoken.CID1990 wrote:Good for Tim. We don’t deserve himIbanez wrote: You think those two give a damn?
Btw- Scott is leaving the Senate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hambone wrote:Please keep UND out of this......kalm wrote:
I’m sure there are.
You’ll have to forgive JBB. His UND education limits his understanding.
Trying to understand was your first mistake∞∞∞ wrote:I'm pretty confused about JBB's "Common Core" reference every other post.
It started in 2010. Has one person on this board been educated with Common Core standards?
Twitters liberal colors showing true as they removed the video..It was pushing 9 million views when I saw it.SDHornet wrote:Orange Man probably provided the best response to this:Ibanez wrote:
I’ve not seen proof of that. If that were the case, and Republicans had the evidence, wouldn’t that be out for all of us to see for ourselves?
None of here has first hand information.
Let’s use some critically thinking skills here. Let’s try to think independently here and not just spout whatever CNN or Fox tells us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Hill's John Solomon provided a treasure trove of docs/info on the Biden's and Ukraine dealings. But yeah, no biggie.
BDKJMU wrote:Meanwhile, CNN refuses to air Trump campaign ad.
LOLChizzang wrote:BDKJMU wrote:Meanwhile, CNN refuses to air Trump campaign ad.
Oh the horror
CID1990 wrote:LOLChizzang wrote:
Oh the horror
The network that gave Trump millions in free advertising when everybody thought he had no chance in 2016 now doesn’t want his campaign money
I don’t know why but this just makes me giggle
What a bunch of garbage. You too are a common core media parrot. No crime was committed and nobody has first hand knowledge of any crime because none was committed.Ibanez wrote:That is a valid point. I guess being that the Hearsay has been verified by Trump and the White House, it may not matter. Ivy, can I get a ruling? Also, what if the people with first hand info come forward? The whistle blower has first hand knowledge of some things which hasn’t been made public, I’d be interested in hearing that.JBB wrote:
Do some math
Explain the difference between hearsay and first hand.
Which is allowed to be submitted in court as evidence?
Which is not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
