Barr Testimony

[Ibanez]

Yeah because the Mueller report we are reading would be so much different if Barr hadn’t mischaracterized it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think Mueller said the media is mischaracterizing the report.

No. He said Barr did.

The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions

[Ibanez]

You are a drama queen queen

If you think a summary by an AG in anticipation of a report that was coming out imminently is the end of the republic...

Just wait until he lies to Congress, defies subpoenas and stonewalls on not one, but two legitimate inquiries

You might need an extra estrogen pill to keep your dander down

like I said - Barr is small fry compared to the last two Dem AGs who you said nothing about... I mean if integrity is REALLY what you care about


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And you are a typical Conk male breeder that talks out of both sides of his mouth depending who is in power. Barr is a phony....a sham....a liar......if you think that Holder was bad for America and think that Barr is good for America then you are a typical piece of Conk deplorable trash.

And you don't? Come off it, Jeff. Have some integrity.

[kalm]

And you are a typical Conk male breeder that talks out of both sides of his mouth depending who is in power. Barr is a phony....a sham....a liar......if you think that Holder was bad for America and think that Barr is good for America then you are a typical piece of Conk deplorable trash.

And you don't? Come off it, Jeff. Have some integrity.

Holder WAS bad for America and Barr is an obvious shill.

[Ibanez]

And you don't? Come off it, Jeff. Have some integrity.

Holder WAS bad for America and Barr is an obvious shill.

Holder AND Lynch.

[CitadelGrad]

I think Mueller said the media is mischaracterizing the report.

No. He said Barr did.

The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions

Justice Department spokesperson said: “After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it. In a cordial and professional conversion, the special counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the special counsel’s obstruction analysis.”

Also:

[Ibanez]

No. He said Barr did.

Justice Department spokesperson said: “After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it. In a cordial and professional conversion, the special counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the special counsel’s obstruction analysis.”

I quoted Mueller. You quoted a person who heard from someone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[∞∞∞]

No. He said Barr did.

Justice Department spokesperson said: “After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it. In a cordial and professional conversion, the special counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the special counsel’s obstruction analysis.”

[CitadelGrad]

Justice Department spokesperson said: “After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it. In a cordial and professional conversion, the special counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the special counsel’s obstruction analysis.”

I quoted Mueller. You quoted a person who heard from someone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I quoted a Justice Dept. spokesman, not some random guy on the street.

[89Hen]

And you are a typical Conk male breeder that talks out of both sides of his mouth depending who is in power.

[Ibanez]

I quoted Mueller. You quoted a person who heard from someone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I quoted a Justice Dept. spokesman, not some random guy on the street.

Like I said, a person who heard from someone else.

[UNI88]

You are a drama queen queen

If you think a summary by an AG in anticipation of a report that was coming out imminently is the end of the republic...

Just wait until he lies to Congress, defies subpoenas and stonewalls on not one, but two legitimate inquiries

You might need an extra estrogen pill to keep your dander down

like I said - Barr is small fry compared to the last two Dem AGs who you said nothing about... I mean if integrity is REALLY what you care about


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And you are a typical Conk male breeder that talks out of both sides of his mouth depending who is in power. Barr is a phony....a sham....a liar......if you think that Holder was bad for America and think that Barr is good for America then you are a typical piece of Conk deplorable trash.

I don't disagree about Barr. Your hypocrisy comes from your critiscm of Barr and partisan silence while Holder was being a phony, a sham and a liar.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[CitadelGrad]

I quoted a Justice Dept. spokesman, not some random guy on the street.

Like I said, a person who heard from someone else.

OK, so the WaPo and Justice Dept. officials now aren't credible?

[SDHornet]

Liberals complaining about Barr .....

It’s like bitching about the trailer after you’ve seen the movie

This should be in the Russia thread with the rest of the progressive rule of law hypocrisy

Was wondering why this wasn't in jelly's abortion thread, because that's where this belongs.

[AZGrizFan]

As expected, the GOP is slobbering to cover up for Traitor Trump and his lackey Barr.

The Democrats are cleaning his clock and showing what an incompetent, lying cover up artist Barr is

I think the word you're looking for is "handpicked AG".

[SDHornet]

Barr is a lying putz. Par for the course under this clown show of an administration.

Yeah because the Mueller report we are reading would be so much different if Barr hadn’t mischaracterized it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But he didn't include Muellers "feels"...

[kalm]

Like I said, a person who heard from someone else.

OK, so the WaPo and Justice Dept. officials now aren't credible?

Barr’s Justice Department says Barr is a good dude.

[AZGrizFan]

I quoted Mueller. You quoted a person who heard from someone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I quoted a Justice Dept. spokesman, not some random guy on the street.

Meuller knows goddamned well that if there was a shred of ANYTHING in that report that made Trump look guilty, THAT is what the media would have focused on...not Barr's "interpretation" of the report. Media has been looking to hang Trump since day one....if he thinks they're somehow conspiring against him, he's got bigger issues.

Fucking retard.

[SDHornet]

I'm loving the leftard meltdown over the Barr testimony...and from the clips I have seen are entertaining as fuck.

So much winning.

[Ibanez]

I'm loving the leftard meltdown over the Barr testimony...and from the clips I have seen are entertaining as fuck.

So much winning.

Was it anything other than a circus?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[∞∞∞]

Like I said, a person who heard from someone else.

OK, so the WaPo and Justice Dept. officials now aren't credible?

The WaPo is credible. All it did was tell us that a justice dept. spokesman said something.

It's called a fact.

[Ibanez]

Like I said, a person who heard from someone else.

OK, so the WaPo and Justice Dept. officials now aren't credible?

I thought the WaPo was fake news and the Justice Dept was nothing but career, deep staters. Which is it?

[CID1990]

Yeah because the Mueller report we are reading would be so much different if Barr hadn’t mischaracterized it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But he didn't include Muellers "feels"...

Full disclosure-

There are zero degrees of separation between me and Barr if you go back to the 80s-90s

It has to do with bagpiping

And he is a decent guy - politics aside

[∞∞∞]

And he is a decent guy - politics aside

That's a big "aside" considering he's a public official and leads one of the most important departments which literally deals with the freedoms of Americans.

[CID1990]

And he is a decent guy - politics aside

That's a big "aside" considering he's a public official and leads one of the most important departments which literally deals with the freedoms of Americans.

Hey look another drama queen who cares only when a Republican is in office

BTW... did Barr’s summary change your mind, or did you wait until the Mueller report came out?

How was it substantially different? Did Barr kill impeachment?

HORROR

[∞∞∞]

Barr's opinion matters little; he's an asshole and conducts his job as such. Someone who believes in the unitary executive theory and his past actions tell me all I need to know about his credibility.

Like Trump, history will remember Barr as an antagonist to democracy, freedom, and justice.