What happens if somebody like her becomes the most powerful political figure on earth..?CID1990 wrote:She spouts bad data taken from partisan sources and passes it off as truth.AZGrizFan wrote:
She’s **** certifiable.
It is very Trumpy.
I expect Clitz to just say she's dumb
(but not really a liar)
The iron gates of presidential dignity, knowledge, and awareness would be torn assunder!!!!Chizzang wrote:What happens if somebody like her becomes the most powerful political figure on earth..?CID1990 wrote:
She spouts bad data taken from partisan sources and passes it off as truth.
It is very Trumpy.
I expect Clitz to just say she's dumb
(but not really a liar)
I can hardly imagine
Gee I wonder if she would surround herself with convicted felons and criminals..?
What would that be like in an administration?
So many unanswered questions
I think it's supposed to be Trump, but I had the same question.UNI88 wrote:Is that Trump or Hillary?mainejeff wrote:
No Clizzart-Chizzang wrote:What happens if somebody like her becomes the most powerful political figure on earth..?CID1990 wrote:
She spouts bad data taken from partisan sources and passes it off as truth.
It is very Trumpy.
I expect Clitz to just say she's dumb
(but not really a liar)
I can hardly imagine
Gee I wonder if she would surround herself with convicted felons and criminals..?
What would that be like in an administration?
So many unanswered questions
CID1990 wrote:No Clizzart-Chizzang wrote:
What happens if somebody like her becomes the most powerful political figure on earth..?
I can hardly imagine
Gee I wonder if she would surround herself with convicted felons and criminals..?
What would that be like in an administration?
So many unanswered questions
your question is actually "are criminals worse than morons"
You're curiously unamused these days. Are you getting enough fiber?
Well criminals - yesChizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
No Clizzart-
your question is actually "are criminals worse than morons"
You're curiously unamused these days. Are you getting enough fiber?
What about morons that also happen to be criminals like the present group..?
George Popodoplis - guilty
Paul Manafort - guilty
Ricky Gates - guilty
Michael Flynn - guilty
Richard Pinado - guilty
Alex Van Der Zwaan - guilty
Michael Cohen - guilty
Sam Patton - guilty
plus 4 Trump aids that struck plea deals to remain nameless
Gosh what would it be like...
Well thank goodness the religious Right hasn't lost the moral high ground...CID1990 wrote:Well criminals - yesChizzang wrote:
What about morons that also happen to be criminals like the present group..?
George Popodoplis - guilty
Paul Manafort - guilty
Ricky Gates - guilty
Michael Flynn - guilty
Richard Pinado - guilty
Alex Van Der Zwaan - guilty
Michael Cohen - guilty
Sam Patton - guilty
plus 4 Trump aids that struck plea deals to remain nameless
Gosh what would it be like...
I don't know if they are morons or not... I've never heard them speak
But I don't know why it is you think I need a reminder about what a sh1tshow the Trump admin is.
I think it is you (and others) who need reminding that apologizing for morons and criminals is not the sole bailiwick of the right - and that's the greatest damage that Trump has done to conservatism... any conservative viewpoint can be dismissed with "but Trump"
which you are doing a lot of lately BTW
convenient time to decide you want new material CIDCID1990 wrote:Wut?
Hasn't that been covered before about 1000 times here?
I'm not really sure why you or anybody else on this board would feel compelled to bring up the moral high ground of the religious right with me, that's allChizzang wrote:convenient time to decide you want new material CIDCID1990 wrote:Wut?
Hasn't that been covered before about 1000 times here?
Just trolling around...CID1990 wrote:I'm not really sure why you or anybody else on this board would feel compelled to bring up the moral high ground of the religious right with me, that's allChizzang wrote:
convenient time to decide you want new material CID
its kind of like bringing up vaginas with Jon or something
dbackjon wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
Kalmunist.kalm wrote:
Yeah...dumb locusts.Baldy wrote:*Hey everybody...my state is great, low cost of living, lots of jobs, wide open spaces. Why don't you move here and help us all turn this place into an expensive overcrowded limited opportunity shithole...whaddaya say?*
Willy Dunne
November 11 ·
If you're tired of being shown maps of the USA that are mostly red even when blue wins big, here's something for ya. This is is a map based on the number people instead of acres. Because it's government by the people for the people and of the people, not by the acreage, for the acreage and of the acreage.
Your post is actually dripping with irony.UNI88 wrote:It's a time honored tradition. Remember "but Bush"? It doesn't make it right but one side complaining about it is ironic at best.mainejeff wrote:
And if the majority tyrannizing the minority was ok nobody would have left England.kalm wrote:Willy Dunne
November 11 ·
If you're tired of being shown maps of the USA that are mostly red even when blue wins big, here's something for ya. This is is a map based on the number people instead of acres. Because it's government by the people for the people and of the people, not by the acreage, for the acreage and of the acreage.
