Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[css75]

They believe that the earth is 6,000 years old, and the Grand Canyon was formed as a byproduct of Noah's Flood.

5 million years for the formation of the Grand Canyon is actually very fast by geological standards
The Colorado River 3 million years ago was a raging torrent



This is why it's important to establish the ground rules for "bad ideas" and "worse ideas"
We have to be able to have adult conversations about bad ideas and not excuse them because of Religion



Fundamentalism is typically a mother load of bad ideas and iron age nonsense

Another example of my original point.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[dbackjon]

Lawn darts turned out to be a bad idea.

Lawn Darts were great!

[dbackjon]

There is ZERO real evidence that it happened because of a fake flood. No wonder Trump won - too many **** idiots reject science.

This is a perfect example of my point about science rejecting God.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No, Science is NOT rejecting God. You are trying to tailor YOUR view of God to science. YOU are the problem, not God, not science. Most normal churches (Catholic, Methodists, etc) recognize that an old earth, evolution, etc can coexist with God.

The problem is with Fundamentalists trying to take a book, which is copied from millenia of story-telling, and try to make it into a history/science book.

It is funny, the so-called followers of Christ, who used parables to illustrate points, insist that Jesus invented this method of story-telling out of thin air (newsflash, Jewish Jesus was simply following tradition).

None of the stories in Genesis, etc are meant to be taken literally.

[Gil Dobie]

Lawn darts turned out to be a bad idea.

Lawn Darts were great!

They still are if you can find a set. They were called Jarts on the box.

[dbackjon]

Lawn Darts were great!

They still are if you can find a set. They were called Jarts on the box.

We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.

[Gil Dobie]

They still are if you can find a set. They were called Jarts on the box.

We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.

You really had to go out of your way to hurt someone with Jarts. Even the helmet craze isn't safe enough for Jarts I guess.

[Chizzang]

5 million years for the formation of the Grand Canyon is actually very fast by geological standards
The Colorado River 3 million years ago was a raging torrent



This is why it's important to establish the ground rules for "bad ideas" and "worse ideas"
We have to be able to have adult conversations about bad ideas and not excuse them because of Religion



Fundamentalism is typically a mother load of bad ideas and iron age nonsense

Another example of my original point.

What point was that..?
That fundamentalism should be "excluded" from Logic and reason

[Ivytalk]

They still are if you can find a set. They were called Jarts on the box.

We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.

But Jorts are still legal, for some reason.

[CID1990]

Instead of being formed slowly over millions of years, the Grand Canyon was formed by massive floods in a short period of time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There is ZERO real evidence that it happened because of a fake flood. No wonder Trump won - too many **** idiots reject Hillary.

FIFY



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[grizzaholic]

[css75]

There is ZERO real evidence that it happened because of a fake flood. No wonder Trump won - too many **** idiots reject Hillary.

FIFY



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Closed minded individuals such as some on this board are why I choose not to discuss this.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Gil Dobie]

phpBB [video]

[89Hen]

They still are if you can find a set. They were called Jarts on the box.

We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.

They were awesome. We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.

[AZGrizFan]

We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.

They were awesome. We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.

Back when thinning the herd was the norm. If you weren't fast enough to get out of the way of an incoming jart, then you didn't deserve to live/procreate anyways...

[Gil Dobie]

They were awesome. We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.

Back when thinning the herd was the norm. If you weren't fast enough to get out of the way of an incoming jart, then you didn't deserve to live/procreate anyways...

[Chizzang]

FIFY



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Closed minded individuals such as some on this board are why I choose not to discuss this.

Closed minded..?
Closed minded means NOT accepting new information and evidence to the contrary of ones own beliefs
Which is quite literally a requirement in order to be a fundamentalist

There isn't a single legitimate scientists I'm aware of
that thinks the planet earth is less than a few billion years old
Heck regular carbon dating proves we've got living trees older than 5000 years
and we've unearthed so many Woolly Mammoths that are in excess of 15,000 years old
So many they've stopped counting them

[89Hen]

Closed minded..?
Closed minded means NOT accepting new information and evidence to the contrary of ones own beliefs

Admit it. He nailed you.

[Chizzang]

Closed minded..?
Closed minded means NOT accepting new information and evidence to the contrary of ones own beliefs

Admit it. He nailed you.

It was more of a WTF moment for me... so yeah he got me



It's also a bit of a swing and a miss
when a Fundamentalist claims its "everybody else" that is closed minded

[89Hen]

It's also a bit of a swing and a miss
when a Fundamentalist claims its "everybody else" that is closed minded

And it's almost as funny as when a liberal says they are more tolerant of other people.

[css75]

Closed minded individuals such as some on this board are why I choose not to discuss this.

Closed minded..?
Closed minded means NOT accepting new information and evidence to the contrary of ones own beliefs
Which is quite literally a requirement in order to be a fundamentalist

There isn't a single legitimate scientists I'm aware of
that thinks the planet earth is less than a few billion years old
Heck regular carbon dating proves we've got living trees older than 5000 years
and we've unearthed so many Woolly Mammoths that are in excess of 15,000 years old
So many they've stopped counting them

Many are out there, the others just do not recognize them, they say it is not science. None of the atheistic ones even look at the findings long enough to disprove it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

It's also a bit of a swing and a miss
when a Fundamentalist claims its "everybody else" that is closed minded

And it's almost as funny as when a liberal says they are more tolerant of other people.

and you've known me long enough to know what I'm all about...
If anyone could defend the Earth being 6,000 years old then I'm all ears

If you're going to defend a fundamentalists on a scientific debate about geological formations
You'll need more than what you're coming at me with here... Science isn't really their thing



It's cute though
because they desperately want to sit at the big boy table

[CID1990]

And it's almost as funny as when a liberal says they are more tolerant of other people.

and you've known me long enough to know what I'm all about...
If anyone could defend the Earth being 6,000 years old then I'm all ears

If you're going to defend a fundamentalists on a scientific debate about geological formations
You'll need more than what you're coming at me with here... Science isn't really their thing



It's cute though
because they desperately want to sit at the big boy table

Admit it

89 trolled you

its a scientific formula... which topics will inevitably conjure up which poster

yours is the bearded man in the sky


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

and you've known me long enough to know what I'm all about...
If anyone could defend the Earth being 6,000 years old then I'm all ears

If you're going to defend a fundamentalists on a scientific debate about geological formations
You'll need more than what you're coming at me with here... Science isn't really their thing



It's cute though
because they desperately want to sit at the big boy table

Admit it

89 trolled you

its a scientific formula... which topics will inevitably conjure up which poster

yours is the bearded man in the sky

Only because it's the best of all possible debate topics...

It's important to pretty much everybody regardless of their position
and the highly Religious desperately want to be in the important conversations
They want so badly to be taken seriously

They'll argue until they fall back on "faith alone" which is the last bastion
but frequently it takes a long time and many good rounds of banter before they get to the end



It's the apex of human debates

[89Hen]

Admit it

89 trolled you

its a scientific formula... which topics will inevitably conjure up which poster

yours is the bearded man in the sky

Only because it's the best of all possible debate topics...

It's important to pretty much everybody regardless of their position
and the highly Religious desperately want to be in the important conversations
They want so badly to be taken seriously

They'll argue until they fall back on "faith alone" which is the last bastion
but frequently it takes a long time and many good rounds of banter before they get to the end



It's the apex of human debates

Translation....

Yup, I was pwnd several times on this thread in the last 24 hours but am still too proud to admit it.

[CID1990]

Admit it

89 trolled you

its a scientific formula... which topics will inevitably conjure up which poster

yours is the bearded man in the sky

Only because it's the best of all possible debate topics...

It's important to pretty much everybody regardless of their position
and the highly Religious desperately want to be in the important conversations
They want so badly to be taken seriously

They'll argue until they fall back on "faith alone" which is the last bastion
but frequently it takes a long time and many good rounds of banter before they get to the end



It's the apex of human debates

That's why I rarely do religious debates (unless I'm ridiculing "evidence based" intelligent design)

enjoyment in that kind of debate must stimulate one of two parts of the brain... the part that likes killing ants with magnifying glasses or the part that allows us to willingly inject fat from our asses into our lips

if the debate is always going to reach the same inevitable endpoint then i dont bother - even if I know Im right




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk