CAA Flagship wrote:Ibanez wrote:
The only one that matters and is credible is Mueller's.
And before anyone says something like, " Well those lawyers gave money to Democrats"...So did Trump. You aren't going to 100% eliminate bias. Which would you rather have - your friends say you are innocent or your enemies say you're innocent? I think having "enemies" admit that you are innocent of all charges carries more weight.
Why?
The congressional investigations are extremely partisan. Those are for show.
Mueller's investigation, even though it's heavy on democrats ( i think 11 of 16 people involved), is lead by expert's in their fields and has already acquired guilty plea's. They aren't coming up with falsehoods. They are exposing facts and have people close to Trump pleading guilty (and likely talking to avoid spending 10 years at Club Fed.)
1) You have a life-long Republican, bringing charges against other Republicans - that to me shows that he's not fucking around.
2) You have senior members of the GOP saying that Mueller's investigation must continue unimpeded and interference from Trump would be "the beginning of the end".
3) Read the appointment:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-relea ... 1/download. Those aren't 'hardened Democrats" mention giving authorizaiton for the investigation. It's men that are lifelong Republicans. One of whom has a history of standing up to Republicans and the other hand picked by Trump.
Did Trump knowingly "collude" with Russia? I wouldn't put it past him but I think he most likely benefited from the certain Russian involvement. And I understand how that would upset a person - it means you possibly didn't win on your own merit (although, Trump doesn't have any).
Keep in mind - this is a counter intelligence investigation not criminal. He's looking into Russian interference into the 2016 election to include any involvement with Trump.
