Cheney: No 'evidence' of Iraq, 9/11 link

[Appaholic]

play gi joe ..........if you were my social equal i would demand satisfaction.......since you're not.....i owe you one thrashing....Bos as 2nd LT.. Afg as Capt.......freaking wasps.......don't they have gas for y'all?

Good for you, and thanks for your service buttmunch.

Social equal, huh? How does one come that conclusion? Color of skin...I'm quite pasty white. Area of birth and raising...I'm definitely southern (by the grace of God ). War of Northern Agression...sure, why not, I concur. Age...I'm 27--not too far behind. Religion? Well happy motza ball soup to you. I guess we aren't social equals...militarily speaking the WASPs keep protecting Israel (you know, your homeland). When will the social superiors take over?

as soon as UN-US allows Palestinians to overrun the jews and recalim their rightful homeland....

[SeattleGriz]

Why no mention of why the Russians were over in Iraq before the war, and still why no release of all the documents that were captured during the war?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/P ... x.asp?pg=1

Bush replied that he wanted the documents released. He turned to Hadley and asked for an update. Hadley explained that John Negroponte, Bush's Director of National Intelligence, "owns the documents" and that DNI lawyers were deciding how they might be handled.

Bush extended his arms in exasperation and worried aloud that people who see the documents in 10 years will wonder why they weren't released sooner. "If
I knew then what I know now," Bush said in the voice of a war skeptic, "I would have been more supportive of the war."

Perhaps anticipating the weakness of his "mere history" argument, Negroponte abruptly shifted his position last week. He still opposes releasing the documents, only now he claims that the information in these documents is so valuable that it cannot be made public. Negroponte gave a statement to Fox News responding to Hoekstra's call to release the captured documents. "These documents have provided, and continue to provide, actionable intelligence to ongoing operations. . . . It would be ill-advised to release these materials without careful screening because the material includes sensitive and potentially harmful information."

Could this be just like the venona project in which the US had intelligence they kept to themselves because it was too important to lay it out for everyone?

[Wedgebuster]

Bump!

Reading up on the history of the personal flap between Clint Eastwood and Michael Moore who apparently have been taking pot shots at each other for about five years, it was pointed out that around 80% of those polled who said they got their news from Fox News hold tightly to their belief that Saddam Hussein was either involved with or totally responsible for the 9/11 attacks, I felt obligated to bump this thread.



C'mon Fox News, quit with the propaganda already, don't you know your audience considers you a "news" outlet?

[89Hen]

your audience considers you a "news" outlet

So do people who watch Glenn Beck, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schulz, Jon Stewart....

[Ibanez]

your audience considers you a "news" outlet

So do people who watch Glenn Beck, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schulz, Jon Stewart....

or any of those entertainment anchors like Papa Bill O'Reilly.

[Wedgebuster]