Attack on Muslim was false?

[houndawg]

Agree with all the above. If only you conks were as tough on financial crimes...

Give us a few more weeks. We'll get that crook Hillary.

I bet Trump backs down and Hillary doesn't spend a single minute behind bars.

[houndawg]

You're mistaking me for Hillary/Dem supporter.

Son, I've been all over the Dem ties to Wall Street since before Geithner was appointed...

The only reason kalm isn't a "dem supporter" is because the party is too close to the middle for his liking.

The Party would need to move quite a bit left to even be able to see the center.

[89Hen]

The only reason kalm isn't a "dem supporter" is because the party is too close to the middle for his liking.

The Party would need to move quite a bit left to even be able to see the center.

[Grizalltheway]

Really? All I've been hearing from conks is about how far left the party has drifted.

And kalm is not a conk, so...

Right, but you are, and now you're trying to claim that it's a centrist party.

[89Hen]

And kalm is not a conk, so...

Right, but you are, and now you're trying to claim that it's a centrist party.

No, it's just that it's not far enough left for the guy who is off the charts these days.

[kalm]

You're mistaking me for Hillary/Dem supporter.

Son, I've been all over the Dem ties to Wall Street since before Geithner was appointed...

Son? I'm in my 50s fwiw - if you're in your 60s or 70s then I guess you can say that...

So why the crack about conks not getting tough on financial crimes?

If you're a conk, you're supposed to be tough on crime. 'Hang 'em high' I say!'

It just doesn't seem like we saw very many calls around prosecuting financial crimes. And that's of course from both parties. Billion dollar fines have simply become a cost of doing business. If I know I can negotiate a settlement for $10 billion with government, after making $60 billion rigging the system, why wouldn't I?

Serious jail time for a few execs might change that dynamic.

We know donks have been in bed with Wall Street and play the crony capitalism game strong. But conks are supposed to be tough on crime and into competition and the free market and all that stuff.

Oh well...

[kalm]

You're mistaking me for Hillary/Dem supporter.

Son, I've been all over the Dem ties to Wall Street since before Geithner was appointed...

The only reason kalm isn't a "dem supporter" is because the party is too close to the middle for his liking.

Guilty as charged. But I'm right in the middle when it comes to the American people on key issues like the war on drugs, money in politics, nation building, weed legalization, Wall Street, entitlement programs....

You often confuse ideology with corporatism. In this sytem, corporatism transcends ideology. It's OK...I've seen it a thousand times...

[89Hen]

The only reason kalm isn't a "dem supporter" is because the party is too close to the middle for his liking.

Guilty as charged. But I'm right in the middle when it comes to the American people on key issues like the war on drugs, money in politics, nation building, weed legalization, Wall Street, entitlement programs....

What about pot?

[kalm]

Guilty as charged. But I'm right in the middle when it comes to the American people on key issues like the war on drugs, money in politics, nation building, weed legalization, Wall Street, entitlement programs....

What about pot?

[Baldy]

The only reason kalm isn't a "dem supporter" is because the party is too close to the middle for his liking.

Guilty as charged. But I'm right in the middle when it comes to the American people on key issues like the war on drugs, money in politics, nation building, weed legalization, Wall Street, entitlement programs....

You often confuse ideology with corporatism. In this sytem, corporatism transcends ideology. It's OK...I've seen it a thousand times...

Weed legalization is a "key issue"?

Strange priorities you have there.

[kalm]

.

[kalm]

Guilty as charged. But I'm right in the middle when it comes to the American people on key issues like the war on drugs, money in politics, nation building, weed legalization, Wall Street, entitlement programs....

You often confuse ideology with corporatism. In this sytem, corporatism transcends ideology. It's OK...I've seen it a thousand times...

Weed legalization is a "key issue"?

Strange priorities you have there.

Yeah I was a little reduntantly redundant there.

But of course it's a key issue. Add up the costs associated, the role it plays with the prison industrial complex, states rights, limited government...

[CID1990]

Son? I'm in my 50s fwiw - if you're in your 60s or 70s then I guess you can say that...

So why the crack about conks not getting tough on financial crimes?

If you're a conk, you're supposed to be tough on crime. 'Hang 'em high' I say!'

Yes we conservatives are monolithic that way



If I was in charge of the criminal codes I'd get rid of about 75% of the entire thing.

But by all means, let's get tough on those potheads and people selling cigarettes on the street or practicing dentistry without a license

[Chizzang]

If you're a conk, you're supposed to be tough on crime. 'Hang 'em high' I say!'

Yes we conservatives are monolithic that way



If I was in charge of the criminal codes I'd get rid of about 75% of the entire thing.

But by all means, let's get tough on those potheads and people selling cigarettes on the street or practicing dentistry without a license

I wish as a society we asked (active and retired) Police Officers their opinions
about what works and what doesn't work as far as laws and crime

Instead of just using them as some kind of hammer to pound nails
we need to create a dialogue with cops in regards to "the world we live in" in it's most honest state

[CAA Flagship]

Yes we conservatives are monolithic that way



If I was in charge of the criminal codes I'd get rid of about 75% of the entire thing.

But by all means, let's get tough on those potheads and people selling cigarettes on the street or practicing dentistry without a license

I wish as a society we asked (active and retired) Police Officers their opinions
about what works and what doesn't work as far as laws and crime

Instead of just using them as some kind of hammer to pound nails
we need to create a dialogue with cops in regards to "the world we live in" in it's most honest state

But since one size never fits all, as a law abiding citizen, what would YOU suggest?

[Chizzang]

I wish as a society we asked (active and retired) Police Officers their opinions
about what works and what doesn't work as far as laws and crime

Instead of just using them as some kind of hammer to pound nails
we need to create a dialogue with cops in regards to "the world we live in" in it's most honest state

But since one size never fits all, as a law abiding citizen, what would YOU suggest?

I'm not sure where you see me suggesting one size fits all..?
and secondly I'm simply suggesting we utilize retired officers as a resource for knowledge
allowing us to write wiser laws and create a better system

[CAA Flagship]

But since one size never fits all, as a law abiding citizen, what would YOU suggest?

I'm not sure where you see me suggesting one size fits all..?
and secondly I'm simply suggesting we utilize retired officers as a resource for knowledge
allowing us to write wiser laws and create a better system

Why do you assume that isn't already being done?

[Chizzang]

I'm not sure where you see me suggesting one size fits all..?
and secondly I'm simply suggesting we utilize retired officers as a resource for knowledge
allowing us to write wiser laws and create a better system

Why do you assume that isn't already being done?

because we'd have more reasonable and understandable legislation on a national level...

[CAA Flagship]

Why do you assume that isn't already being done?

because we'd have more reasonable and understandable legislation on a national level...

So a certain "style" of policing should be legislated?

[kalm]

If you're a conk, you're supposed to be tough on crime. 'Hang 'em high' I say!'

Yes we conservatives are monolithic that way



If I was in charge of the criminal codes I'd get rid of about 75% of the entire thing.

But by all means, let's get tough on those potheads and people selling cigarettes on the street or practicing dentistry without a license

Yeah... you NEVER paint liberals with a broad brush.

Conks are supposed to be tough on crime. They are when it comes to weed but not so much when it comes to financial crimes (neither are the donks). Roll your eyes all you want.

The rest of your post is a good example of why you're at least a palatable conk.

[CID1990]

Yes we conservatives are monolithic that way



If I was in charge of the criminal codes I'd get rid of about 75% of the entire thing.

But by all means, let's get tough on those potheads and people selling cigarettes on the street or practicing dentistry without a license

Yeah... you NEVER paint liberals with a broad brush.

Actually, I don't

Feel free to post a link though.

I DO call out doctrinaire, check all the progressive fad boxes liberals pretending to be moderates, though. Since there's only one in this forum I don't have to do it often.

[Chizzang]

because we'd have more reasonable and understandable legislation on a national level...

So a certain "style" of policing should be legislated?

Nope,
A certain style of legislation
I'm talking about laws not law enforcement

Using law enforcement officers ideas on laws

[kalm]

Yeah... you NEVER paint liberals with a broad brush.

Actually, I don't

Feel free to post a link though.

I DO call out doctrinaire, check all the progressive fad boxes liberals pretending to be moderates, though. Since there's only one in this forum I don't have to do it often.

I wasn't going to go down the rabbit hole since you seemed so sure. But once I decided to, it was kind of fun. I first searched your user name and the word "Klam". It brought up a ton of hits, and I'm flattered.

I then switched to "the left" and found this one where Chizzy chastises you for hypocrisy and pretty much doing what I said.

Postby Chizzang » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:05 am

CID1990 wrote:
slycat wrote:
There is a part of me that wants Trump to win just to see the circus. Odds are he will be the greatest failure we have ever seen in the Oval Office and that's not something you see everyday. Plus the left will lose their **** and that's popcorn worthy too.


exactly

Trump wins, lawsuits by the left into the result, and perpetual riots

i hope they burn whole cities to the ground- show their true colors (as if we havent already seen them)


Soccer moms burning cities to the ground...
Like when the bankers flipped the world economy and then got bailed out

CID
Try not to confuse college students with "The Left"
That's the same as confusing Religious nut balls with "The Right" as you enjoy reminding me

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... t#p1083725

Now I'm sure you'll argue it's not exactly the same but this was only after a few minutes of searching just two key words/phrases. If you'd like, I can go try searching words like "liberals", "progressives", "doctrinaire" etc and find some more examples if you'd like.

[CID1990]

You're mistaking me for Hillary/Dem supporter.

Son, I've been all over the Dem ties to Wall Street since before Geithner was appointed...

Son? I'm in my 50s fwiw - if you're in your 60s or 70s then I guess you can say that...

So why the crack about conks not getting tough on financial crimes?

Because he's one of those "yes, but" original thinkers.

[CID1990]

Actually, I don't

Feel free to post a link though.

I DO call out doctrinaire, check all the progressive fad boxes liberals pretending to be moderates, though. Since there's only one in this forum I don't have to do it often.

I wasn't going to go down the rabbit hole since you seemed so sure. But once I decided to, it was kind of fun. I first searched your user name and the word "Klam". It brought up a ton of hits, and I'm flattered.

I then switched to "the left" and found this one where Chizzy chastises you for hypocrisy and pretty much doing what I said.

Postby Chizzang » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:05 am

CID1990 wrote:
slycat wrote:
There is a part of me that wants Trump to win just to see the circus. Odds are he will be the greatest failure we have ever seen in the Oval Office and that's not something you see everyday. Plus the left will lose their **** and that's popcorn worthy too.


exactly

Trump wins, lawsuits by the left into the result, and perpetual riots

i hope they burn whole cities to the ground- show their true colors (as if we havent already seen them)


Soccer moms burning cities to the ground...
Like when the bankers flipped the world economy and then got bailed out

CID
Try not to confuse college students with "The Left"
That's the same as confusing Religious nut balls with "The Right" as you enjoy reminding me

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... t#p1083725

Now I'm sure you'll argue it's not exactly the same but this was only after a few minutes of searching just two key words/phrases. If you'd like, I can go try searching words like "liberals", "progressives", "doctrinaire" etc and find some more examples if you'd like.

There's only one problem

The "left" HAS been losing their collective sh1t, just as predicted. And the hair pulling isn't coming from the fringe - it's coming from up and down the spectrum. I even have colleagues- former tut-tutters, Georgetown and Harvard educated progressives - who thought those "Obama is a Muslim" flyover country bumpkins were so dramatic

Now they're in full "the Nazis are coming let's head for the hills" mode

Almost to a man- and they're all publicizing the protest marches they are going to in a few weeks.

So the original post and my reply are strangely prescient - Clitzstain's 'yes but conservatives do it too' allusion notwithstanding