But what about JSO?93henfan wrote:If they do not have another Trump tape, they need to invent one.
James Carville is probably splicing something as we speak. While Donna Brazile gives him head.
Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Just curious, I saw increasing pushback from developers to build LEED certified buildings at the time I left the workforce. There was very little value in it in the private sector. Businesses looking for space just didn't care if the building was LEED certified or not. And they surely didn't want to pay the premium for it. What's the climate these days for LEED?∞∞∞ wrote:I do the construction management on most my projects, or at least as many hours we have in the contract. I review submittals for accuracy and guide the contractors when they need help. There's a ton of times I've allowed contractors to use alternative methods if they make a case for it, but there's no way to ensure they do everything by the books. A lot of these contractors are smarter than me so I try to learn from them if it makes sense to.SDHornet wrote: Actually it's about following the rules and cherry picking which rules to follow. I take it you have never been on a project where a CM lets a contractor pick and choose which specs to follow (you know, the people side of engineering). It get's fun watching the CM trying to reel in the contractor after letting him slide on certain aspects of the project. Maybe someday you'll understand.
Ibanez, I want the PE because it'll help me get into other technical industries, even if I don't use it. I'm a LEED AP and ENV SP, so I've always wanted to get into the sustainability and environmental fields...perhaps at the EPA or USGBC or a non-profit. I don't want to get pigeon-holed in my line of work for too long.
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Before he answers, keep in mind that Trip is in the beltway and the federal government is in love with LEED, regardless of how much it costs you, the taxpayer. DC is not necessarily representative of the rest of the country.CAA Flagship wrote:Just curious, I saw increasing pushback from developers to build LEED certified buildings at the time I left the workforce. There was very little value in it in the private sector. Businesses looking for space just didn't care if the building was LEED certified or not. And they surely didn't want to pay the premium for it. What's the climate these days for LEED?∞∞∞ wrote: I do the construction management on most my projects, or at least as many hours we have in the contract. I review submittals for accuracy and guide the contractors when they need help. There's a ton of times I've allowed contractors to use alternative methods if they make a case for it, but there's no way to ensure they do everything by the books. A lot of these contractors are smarter than me so I try to learn from them if it makes sense to.
Ibanez, I want the PE because it'll help me get into other technical industries, even if I don't use it. I'm a LEED AP and ENV SP, so I've always wanted to get into the sustainability and environmental fields...perhaps at the EPA or USGBC or a non-profit. I don't want to get pigeon-holed in my line of work for too long.
My last pure construction gig was at NIST, and everything they did required LEED cert specs.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Not sure how you can say that Ryan won't piss off the tea party/Trump types. They HATE him. He will never be president.CID1990 wrote:I've thought a lot about this scenario.Ibanez wrote: This is what we deserve. The electorate has allowed this crap to go on for so long that we're stuck between choosing between 2 steaming piles of crap.
I kind of pray that Johnson wins 1 state, forces the election to go to the HoR and they choose Johnson as POTUS.
Johnson, on his most stoned day, would be better than Clinton or Trump.
The only way Johnson prevents either candidate from getting to 270 is if the race is a dead heat, but Johnson actually has to win a state or two. Possible, but not likely.
However, I think McMullen is going to carry Utah, so throw out those electoral votes.
Johnson might deny Clinton one or two states- not by winning them, but by throwing them to Trump.
If the election goes to the House I think it will go this way:
Clinton obviously is out.
House GOP running for reelection in the next cycle will want to go with someone vanilla, but someone who doesn't piss off the Trump/Tea Party voters too much.
That means this faction would push either Rubio or Ryan. They all hate Cruz.
The more "safe" seats could go in one or two directions- hard right (Cruz) or hard moderate (Kasich or Ryan).
In the end, I think it would go to Ryan. He is prominently positioned. His nomination wouldn't hurt too badly at the polls in the next cycle for house members. He's less moderate than Kasich. Most importantly, the messaging will be that after such a contentious election, we need a moderating force to bring us all back to earth. That, to me, means Ryan with Kasich as a possible sop to Democrats.
OR, if the House was REALLY serious about settling the dust....
President James Webb
Vice President Ryan
That's my fantasy ticket with no possibility of happening
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
The deplorables will vote Republican, period. They may rabble-rouse for their chosen candidate during primary season, but in the end, they won't turn into a pussy/traitor and vote Libertarian or Democrat.HI54UNI wrote:Not sure how you can say that Ryan won't piss off the tea party/Trump types. They HATE him. He will never be president.CID1990 wrote:
I've thought a lot about this scenario.
The only way Johnson prevents either candidate from getting to 270 is if the race is a dead heat, but Johnson actually has to win a state or two. Possible, but not likely.
However, I think McMullen is going to carry Utah, so throw out those electoral votes.
Johnson might deny Clinton one or two states- not by winning them, but by throwing them to Trump.
If the election goes to the House I think it will go this way:
Clinton obviously is out.
House GOP running for reelection in the next cycle will want to go with someone vanilla, but someone who doesn't piss off the Trump/Tea Party voters too much.
That means this faction would push either Rubio or Ryan. They all hate Cruz.
The more "safe" seats could go in one or two directions- hard right (Cruz) or hard moderate (Kasich or Ryan).
In the end, I think it would go to Ryan. He is prominently positioned. His nomination wouldn't hurt too badly at the polls in the next cycle for house members. He's less moderate than Kasich. Most importantly, the messaging will be that after such a contentious election, we need a moderating force to bring us all back to earth. That, to me, means Ryan with Kasich as a possible sop to Democrats.
OR, if the House was REALLY serious about settling the dust....
President James Webb
Vice President Ryan
That's my fantasy ticket with no possibility of happening
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39258
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
I sure hope you have better things to do than think about that. Holy colossal waste of time Batman.CID1990 wrote:I've thought a lot about this scenario.Ibanez wrote:I kind of pray that Johnson wins 1 state, forces the election to go to the HoR and they choose Johnson as POTUS.

Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
OK good. I wasn't the only one thinking that thought.89Hen wrote:I sure hope you have better things to do than think about that. Holy colossal waste of time Batman.CID1990 wrote: I've thought a lot about this scenario.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Pwns
- Level4

- Posts: 7343
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
You guys have never daydreamed about winning the lottery? An election to the HoR would be almost as awesome and more likely. What could be more awesome than watching liberals and Trump voter heads exploding at the same time? I'd die laughing.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39258
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Winning the lottery = I winPwns wrote:You guys have never daydreamed about winning the lottery? An election to the HoR would be almost as awesome and more likely. What could be more awesome than watching liberals and Trump voter heads exploding at the same time? I'd die laughing.
Election to HoR = nobody wins

Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
I've never done a LEED project (thus wanting to find a new job), but it's popular with state and federal work, private developers in the northeast and California, and parts of the northwest and southwest (where energy costs can be high). It really hasn't picked up steam in the deep south, southeast, or midwest.CAA Flagship wrote:Just curious, I saw increasing pushback from developers to build LEED certified buildings at the time I left the workforce. There was very little value in it in the private sector. Businesses looking for space just didn't care if the building was LEED certified or not. And they surely didn't want to pay the premium for it. What's the climate these days for LEED?∞∞∞ wrote: I do the construction management on most my projects, or at least as many hours we have in the contract. I review submittals for accuracy and guide the contractors when they need help. There's a ton of times I've allowed contractors to use alternative methods if they make a case for it, but there's no way to ensure they do everything by the books. A lot of these contractors are smarter than me so I try to learn from them if it makes sense to.
Ibanez, I want the PE because it'll help me get into other technical industries, even if I don't use it. I'm a LEED AP and ENV SP, so I've always wanted to get into the sustainability and environmental fields...perhaps at the EPA or USGBC or a non-profit. I don't want to get pigeon-holed in my line of work for too long.
Anywhere you go though, it's popular with large corporations, universities, and hospitals. The tech world in particularly is really into it, especially when it comes to data centers.
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
They are going to be pissed regardless because the House will not declare Trump president under any circumstances.HI54UNI wrote:Not sure how you can say that Ryan won't piss off the tea party/Trump types. They HATE him. He will never be president.CID1990 wrote:
I've thought a lot about this scenario.
The only way Johnson prevents either candidate from getting to 270 is if the race is a dead heat, but Johnson actually has to win a state or two. Possible, but not likely.
However, I think McMullen is going to carry Utah, so throw out those electoral votes.
Johnson might deny Clinton one or two states- not by winning them, but by throwing them to Trump.
If the election goes to the House I think it will go this way:
Clinton obviously is out.
House GOP running for reelection in the next cycle will want to go with someone vanilla, but someone who doesn't piss off the Trump/Tea Party voters too much.
That means this faction would push either Rubio or Ryan. They all hate Boobs.
The more "safe" seats could go in one or two directions- hard right (Boobs) or hard moderate (Kasich or Ryan).
In the end, I think it would go to Ryan. He is prominently positioned. His nomination wouldn't hurt too badly at the polls in the next cycle for house members. He's less moderate than Kasich. Most importantly, the messaging will be that after such a contentious election, we need a moderating force to bring us all back to earth. That, to me, means Ryan with Kasich as a possible sop to Democrats.
OR, if the House was REALLY serious about settling the dust....
President James Webb
Vice President Ryan
That's my fantasy ticket with no possibility of happening
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm talking about the choice that will piss off the Tea Party the LEAST while also choosing someone who will be level headed. I think the trade off there is Ryan. Another possibility there is Rubio but as far as the Trump voters go, he'll be a wash with Ryan. The House will pick someone who did not pick boogers like Rubio in the primaries and that means Ryan (pisses off TP) and Kasich (REALLY pisses off TP)
Remember- these congresscritters want to get re-elected, and in the changing voting landscape, Trump/Cruz/any other nut is not an option.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- Pwns
- Level4

- Posts: 7343
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
I beg to differ.89Hen wrote:Winning the lottery = I winPwns wrote:You guys have never daydreamed about winning the lottery? An election to the HoR would be almost as awesome and more likely. What could be more awesome than watching liberals and Trump voter heads exploding at the same time? I'd die laughing.
Election to HoR = nobody wins
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
If Evan McMullin can win Utah and this thing actually goes the House (both scenarios which I don't think will happen), I think McMullin would be our next President.
- Pwns
- Level4

- Posts: 7343
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Now they're doing Obamacare spin control.93henfan wrote:WOW! You know things are bad for Hillary when CNN goes back to an actual non-election news story as the headline during the final week of the election.![]()
Here's what they usually look like:
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
What? But he believes in Climate Change and is Mormon. I don't trust a man that doesn't drink.∞∞∞ wrote:If Evan McMullin can win Utah and this thing actually goes the House (both scenarios which I don't think will happen), I think McMullin would be our next President.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Yes, I saw that a few minutes ago. Said something to the effect of, "most won't see the full price hike".Pwns wrote:Now they're doing Obamacare spin control.93henfan wrote:WOW! You know things are bad for Hillary when CNN goes back to an actual non-election news story as the headline during the final week of the election.![]()
Here's what they usually look like:
Translation: some of you are going to get fucked way more than others.
Seriously, CNN is creeping into 1984 territory anymore with all the spin and newspeak.
Last edited by 93henfan on Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39258
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
There are zero options I see as a win. Johnson? Please.Pwns wrote:I beg to differ.89Hen wrote: Winning the lottery = I win
Election to HoR = nobody wins

Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
He said the win is watching it all go down. That part I agree would be a win.89Hen wrote:There are zero options I see as a win. Johnson? Please.Pwns wrote:
I beg to differ.
At some point though, we need to get past the enjoyment of watching people we disagree with fail spectacularly and get back to all winning together spectacularly like we did two generations ago.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
That bastion of conservative values, the New York Times, has cleared Trump of any direct ties to Russia:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/po ... .html?_r=0Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39258
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
That would be entertaining, but not really a win IMO.93henfan wrote:He said the win is watching it all go down. That part I agree would be a win.89Hen wrote: There are zero options I see as a win. Johnson? Please.
At some point though, we need to get past the enjoyment of watching people we disagree with fail spectacularly and get back to all winning together spectacularly like we did two generations ago.

Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
OK, you're wordsmithing (imagine that!). I think we all agree.89Hen wrote:That would be entertaining, but not really a win IMO.93henfan wrote:
He said the win is watching it all go down. That part I agree would be a win.
At some point though, we need to get past the enjoyment of watching people we disagree with fail spectacularly and get back to all winning together spectacularly like we did two generations ago.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Pwns
- Level4

- Posts: 7343
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
The House won't pick anyone who is actually running for president. Their pick would suck, but it would almost surely be better than the crook or the clown. We could go from the fire back to the frying pan, so in that way we win.89Hen wrote:There are zero options I see as a win. Johnson? Please.Pwns wrote:
I beg to differ.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39258
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
But in that case, half the country would feel they were ripped off when somebody from the other party is chosen. That's a really bad environment IMO.Pwns wrote:The House won't pick anyone who is actually running for president. Their pick would suck, but it would almost surely be better than the crook or the clown. We could go from the fire back to the frying pan, so in that way we win.89Hen wrote: There are zero options I see as a win. Johnson? Please.

- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 35234
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
You could have just said liberals and tree huggers.∞∞∞ wrote:I've never done a LEED project (thus wanting to find a new job), but it's popular with state and federal work, private developers in the northeast and California, and parts of the northwest and southwest (where energy costs can be high). It really hasn't picked up steam in the deep south, southeast, or midwest.CAA Flagship wrote: Just curious, I saw increasing pushback from developers to build LEED certified buildings at the time I left the workforce. There was very little value in it in the private sector. Businesses looking for space just didn't care if the building was LEED certified or not. And they surely didn't want to pay the premium for it. What's the climate these days for LEED?
Anywhere you go though, it's popular with large corporations, universities, and hospitals. The tech world in particularly is really into it, especially when it comes to data centers.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31480
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Election 2016: Trump vs Clinton
Sounds more and more like H-rod might not last long. Lost of people trying to cover up for her email crap, from Obama to the FBI director on down. Even her campaign people knew about this crap. Oh, she'll get elected, but will she be around to take office.
Meet your next president

Meet your next president


