Hillary the Populist

Political discussions
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by JohnStOnge »

andy7171 wrote:JSO is going to love this.
Hillary is bad. Trump is worse.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by andy7171 »

JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote:JSO is going to love this.
Hillary is bad. Trump is worse.
Here's a thought, just don't fucking vote. You won't be alone this go around.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by JohnStOnge »

andy7171 wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
Hillary is bad. Trump is worse.
Here's a thought, just don't **** vote. You won't be alone this go around.
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by YoUDeeMan »

JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote: Here's a thought, just don't **** vote. You won't be alone this go around.
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
You are a fraud.

Your main concern is the Constitution. Your other main concern is that the judiciary is out of control...especially the Supreme Court.

Life. Time. Appointments.

And you want Hillary and the Dems to pick the next 3-4 judges. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The entire country's legal system will be changed forever in a direction away from the Constitution that you want. Every law you support, and everything you hold dear, will crumble before your eyes in the next 8 years.

But you don't like the way that Trumps speaks when he doesn't use prepared notes. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Lesser of two evils? :suspicious:

:dunce:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by Ivytalk »

JohnStOnge wrote:
andy7171 wrote: Here's a thought, just don't **** vote. You won't be alone this go around.
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
I don't understand how a self-proclaimed GOP-leaning libertarian can pull the lever for a corrupt old coont who is being dragged to the left by a doddering socialist geezer who probably hasn't had a boner since the Eisenhower administration.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by SDHornet »

Cluck U wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
You are a fraud.

Your main concern is the Constitution. Your other main concern is that the judiciary is out of control...especially the Supreme Court.

Life. Time. Appointments.

And you want Hillary and the Dems to pick the next 3-4 judges. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The entire country's legal system will be changed forever in a direction away from the Constitution that you want. Every law you support, and everything you hold dear, will crumble before your eyes in the next 8 years.

But you don't like the way that Trumps speaks when he doesn't use prepared notes. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Lesser of two evils? :suspicious:

:dunce:
You know, I think you really need to stop. It's like watching a home run derby with these JSO threads. JFC how full retard can one person go? :dunce: :rofl:
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by HI54UNI »

Ivytalk wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
I don't understand how a self-proclaimed GOP-leaning libertarian can pull the lever for a corrupt old coont who is being dragged to the left by a doddering socialist geezer who probably hasn't had a boner since the Eisenhower administration.
It's because the self proclaimed libertarian is really an evangelical Christian. If he was a libertarian he wouldn't give a shit about gays and would be voting for the Libertarian candidate.

And :lol: at the boner since Eisenhower. :lol:
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
No. I always vote. And many times I go with the lesser of two evils. This is an extreme case of the lesser of two evils scenario. And I'll have to go with Clinton.

The Republican primary electorate did THAT bad of a job of picking a nominee. They could've picked ANYBODY else available among their candidates. But they had to pick the ONE candidate available to them that is just totally unacceptable.

In fairness, the majority of them didn't do that. But enough of them did to put us into this situation.
You are a fraud.

Your main concern is the Constitution. Your other main concern is that the judiciary is out of control...especially the Supreme Court.

Life. Time. Appointments.

And you want Hillary and the Dems to pick the next 3-4 judges. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The entire country's legal system will be changed forever in a direction away from the Constitution that you want. Every law you support, and everything you hold dear, will crumble before your eyes in the next 8 years.

But you don't like the way that Trumps speaks when he doesn't use prepared notes. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Lesser of two evils? :suspicious:

:dunce:


This. This election is NOT about the next 4-8 years. It's about the next 20..40..possibly 100 years. The next President will put 1 and the potential of another 3 (Kennedy, Ginsberg and Breyer). THAT is what's at stake here.


If you TRULY CARED, you'd vote for Trump and make sure liberals (or activist judges as you like to call them) aren't the majority.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hillary the Populist

Post by Ibanez »

HI54UNI wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: I don't understand how a self-proclaimed GOP-leaning libertarian can pull the lever for a corrupt old coont who is being dragged to the left by a doddering socialist geezer who probably hasn't had a boner since the Eisenhower administration.
It's because the self proclaimed libertarian is really an evangelical Christian. If he was a libertarian he wouldn't give a shit about gays and would be voting for the Libertarian candidate.

And :lol: at the boner since Eisenhower. :lol:
Which is funny because nothing about his posts scream "libertarian."
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Post Reply