UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
UNHWildCats
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6984
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
I am a fan of: New Hampshire
A.K.A.: UNHWildCats

UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by UNHWildCats »

CONCORD, N.H.—A panel appointed to study funding for the University of New Hampshire's athletic programs recommends treating athletics as a core rather than auxiliary function, dramatically increasing fundraising efforts and making significant upgrades to aging facilities.

UNH President Mark Huddleston appointed the panel after students balked at a proposed increase in athletics fees in 2008. Under the current funding system, undergraduate fees account for $9 million of the $24 million athletics budget.

In a report released Friday, the panel said UNH athletics provide a high quality product with a limited budget. But it found that fundraising efforts lag far behind other schools, and that some facilities, including the football stadium, are substandard.

http://www.boston.com/sports/other_spor ... athletics/
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by dbackjon »

Some very smart people on that panel.
:thumb:
kdinva
Level1
Level1
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:24 pm
I am a fan of: VMI
A.K.A.: kd
Location: southside Richmond

Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by kdinva »

dbackjon wrote:Some very smart people on that panel.
Too bad those folks didn't do a similar study for Northeastern & Hofstra.......... :(
1-AA is tops!!
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by danefan »

Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.

Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.

Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.

The same crap that has been going on Albany for the last 5-7 years. We've had about 5 studies done so far and all agree that we need a facility upgrade in the worst way.

We're still sitting on wooden boards bolted to a set up of steps. :evil:
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by mainejeff »

danefan wrote:Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.

Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.

Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
Exactly.

Maine is in the same boat as UNH with the difference being that donors have stepped forward and facilities have been improved immensely over the past decade.
Go Black Bears!
yorkcountyUNHfan
Level1
Level1
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:58 am
I am a fan of: UNH

Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function

Post by yorkcountyUNHfan »

mainejeff wrote:
danefan wrote:Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.

Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.

Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
Exactly.

Maine is in the same boat as UNH with the difference being that donors have stepped forward and facilities have been improved immensely over the past decade.
True, but now we at at least looking at the issue.
Post Reply