When it all started going downhill

Political discussions
Post Reply
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Some light reading on the rise of progressivism during the time of the Gilded Age and the Robber Barrons when much of the groundwork that saw the rise of organized labor, citizen movements, regulatory agencies, and the New Deal was layed.

Funny how both sides proclaim a desire for freedom and how both the market and the nanny state can take it away. I'm a big fan of the middle of the road. I hate regulatory audits but love my middle class customers and public fishing access. 8-)
Progressives were also the driving force behind early regulation experiments, supporting the creation of state agencies to oversee industries such as the railroads and other trusts. At the federal level, these debates led to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission and later the Federal Trade Commission. Although both agencies faced stiff opposition from the Supreme Court which routinely narrowed the scope of regulatory power on antitrust issues, these efforts helped set the stage for the New Deal. At the state level, rate commissions and other forms of regulatory oversight of the economy became more common. Finally, at the local level, progressives engaged in a spirited effort to develop systems of public utilities. From transportation systems to water provision, reformers argued that private monopolies in these necessity-providing industries undermined the public good. Through unique municipal oversight, and in some cases outright public ownership, progressives tried to deploy the powers of the states to ensure that basic necessities were provided effectively and fairly.

The common thread running through these disparate reform efforts was a distinctly progressive view of freedom that contrasted with the free-market views of conservatives. This vision was most clearly articulated by Progressive Era thinkers such as the philosopher and activist John Dewey, and Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.

For both Dewey and Brandeis, freedom meant more than just individual autonomy and free market exchange. Instead, freedom was achieved when citizens were able to live meaningful lives. In the modern economy, creating this sort of freedom meant enacting public policies that would protect individuals from extreme insecurity and exploitation.
http://www.salon.com/2012/03/04/beyond_the_free_market/
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Conks are sending us back to the late 40's.

:coffee:
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Rob Iola »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Conks are sending us back to the late 40's.

:coffee:
Not a fan of Truman?
Proletarians of the world, unite!
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by dbackjon »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Conks are sending us back to the late 40's.

:coffee:

More like the 1880's
:thumb:
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

Image

:nod:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:Image

:nod:
:lol:

There's a certain degree of truth to that. Especially if you view Obama as a progressive. Which I don't. :ohno:
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Ivytalk »

dbackjon wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Conks are sending us back to the late 40's.

:coffee:

More like the 1880's
Ridiculous. There were no gays back then. :roll:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote:Image

:nod:
:lol:

There's a certain degree of truth to that. Especially if you view Obama as a progressive. Which I don't. :ohno:
Obama? :roll:

We're talking about the Occupy Wall Street Crowd and the people of that ilk...such as the author of the article you posted. They want to replace the car with a train, the power plant with a windmill, the individual with a collective.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
:lol:

There's a certain degree of truth to that. Especially if you view Obama as a progressive. Which I don't. :ohno:
Obama? :roll:

We're talking about the Occupy Wall Street Crowd and the people of that ilk...such as the author of the article you posted. They want to replace the car with a train, the power plant with a windmill, the individual with a collective.
Yeah, because Teddy Roosevelt, the mid-west farmers, and iPad wielding college kids were/are soooooo anti technology.

Nice try though. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by D1B »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
:lol:

There's a certain degree of truth to that. Especially if you view Obama as a progressive. Which I don't. :ohno:
Obama? :roll:

We're talking about the Occupy Wall Street Crowd and the people of that ilk...such as the author of the article you posted. They want to replace the car with a train, the power plant with a windmill, the individual with a collective.
Image

"God damn liberals killed the automobile!"
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Wedgebuster »

When it all started going downhill-

Contract For America.











end/thread
Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote:
Obama? :roll:

We're talking about the Occupy Wall Street Crowd and the people of that ilk...such as the author of the article you posted. They want to replace the car with a train, the power plant with a windmill, the individual with a collective.
Yeah, because Teddy Roosevelt, the mid-west farmers, and iPad wielding college kids were/are soooooo anti technology.

Nice try though. :thumb:
Teddy Roosevelt was a proponent of the "Progressive" ideal of eugenics. Generally speaking, mid-west farmers aren't "progressives", and the "iPad wielding college kids" are the ones who make up the booger eating rapists of OWS.

You whiffed again... :kisswink:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
Yeah, because Teddy Roosevelt, the mid-west farmers, and iPad wielding college kids were/are soooooo anti technology.

Nice try though. :thumb:
Teddy Roosevelt was a proponent of the "Progressive" ideal of eugenics. Generally speaking, mid-west farmers aren't "progressives", and the "iPad wielding college kids" are the ones who make up the booger eating rapists of OWS.

You whiffed again... :kisswink:
I notice that eugenics thing keeps popping up as a conk talking point :coffee:

The progressive movement had a strong farm oriented contingent. :coffee:

You need to replace booger eater. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote: I notice that eugenics thing keeps popping up as a conk talking point :coffee:
You say talking point, I call it the truth. It is what it is... :nod:
The progressive movement had a strong farm oriented contingent. :coffee:
Those farmers used mules to plow their fields, horse and buggy to take their products to market, and took a dump in an outhouse. Times have changed. :nod:
You need to replace booger eater. :coffee:
I was being nice. I could always go with this if you prefer. :nod:

Image
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by citdog »

Image
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote: I notice that eugenics thing keeps popping up as a conk talking point :coffee:
You say talking point, I call it the truth. It is what it is... :nod:
The progressive movement had a strong farm oriented contingent. :coffee:
Those farmers used mules to plow their fields, horse and buggy to take their products to market, and took a dump in an outhouse. Times have changed. :nod:
You need to replace booger eater. :coffee:
I was being nice. I could always go with this if you prefer. :nod:

Image
The thread and linked article were about the history of the progressive movement. You tried to make a funny about how progressives were anti-technology and posted a picture which I even acknowledged as decent smack. You then brought OWS into the discussion. :ugeek:

Progressivism was not historically nor is it currently anti-technology. It was mostly about anti-monopolism, something that a card carrying conk such as yourself should be all for - you know - freedom, democracy, freedom in the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism. :coffee:

Your understanding of history will improve as your reading comprehension improves. Keep efforting. :kisswink:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
polsongrizz
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5347
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:41 am
I am a fan of: MONTANA
A.K.A.: The Beer Snob
Location: Not sure yet, if you know call me

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by polsongrizz »

dbackjon wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Conks are sending us back to the late 40's.

:coffee:

More like the 1880's
:thumb:
Image
“We didn’t have a man or woman in the drone,” Trump explained to a confused America. “We had nobody in the drone. It would have made a big difference, let me tell you. It would have made a big, big difference.”
Mexico will pay for the wall
THE MOON IS PART OF MARS
User avatar
LeadBolt
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3586
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Botetourt

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by LeadBolt »

It all started down hill with first allowing non-taxpaers (non-property owners at the time) then women to vote. ;)
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote: The thread and linked article were about the history of the progressive movement. You tried to make a funny about how progressives were anti-technology and posted a picture which I even acknowledged as decent smack. You then brought OWS into the discussion. :ugeek:

Progressivism was not historically nor is it currently anti-technology. It was mostly about anti-monopolism, something that a card carrying conk such as yourself should be all for - you know - freedom, democracy, freedom in the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism. :coffee:

Your understanding of history will improve as your reading comprehension improves. Keep efforting. :kisswink:
Says the guy who believes the 'robber baron' myth. Thank you, kalm Jennings Bryan. :roll:

I never claimed 'progressives' were anti-technology. :suspicious:

OWS is the epicenter of the 21 century 'progressive' movement. Have you read their so-called list of demands? These are the things that make the mouths of hard core 'progressives' water...the demand for Congress to institute a guaranteed 'living wage' regardless of employment, single payer socialized medicine, immediate across the board debt forgiveness, etc, etc, etc.

Do you actually believe that progressives believe in freedom, or democracy, or the freedom of the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism? :shock:

The truth is, by definition, progressives don't believe in ANY of those things. Freedom? yeah maybe in the movie they want to see or the freedom to pick the color of the shirt they want to wear. Other than that, they want the government to tell you what type of car to drive, where to live, how much money you can make, what to eat, what type of energy we can consume, and the list goes on and on. In the 1920's, progressives had prohibition and the temperance movement. Today, their new temperance movement is smoking.

Government cronyism is the foundation on which progressivism was built. After all, the definition of progressivism is to bring social , political, and economic change through government action. :ohno:

You are right about one thing though, my understanding of history evolves everyday. Don't worry, if you put in the effort, yours will too. You won't be this ignorant forever.....hopefully. :thumb:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote: The thread and linked article were about the history of the progressive movement. You tried to make a funny about how progressives were anti-technology and posted a picture which I even acknowledged as decent smack. You then brought OWS into the discussion. :ugeek:

Progressivism was not historically nor is it currently anti-technology. It was mostly about anti-monopolism, something that a card carrying conk such as yourself should be all for - you know - freedom, democracy, freedom in the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism. :coffee:

Your understanding of history will improve as your reading comprehension improves. Keep efforting. :kisswink:
Says the guy who believes the 'robber baron' myth. Thank you, kalm Jennings Bryan. :roll:

I never claimed 'progressives' were anti-technology. :suspicious:

OWS is the epicenter of the 21 century 'progressive' movement. Have you read their so-called list of demands? These are the things that make the mouths of hard core 'progressives' water...the demand for Congress to institute a guaranteed 'living wage' regardless of employment, single payer socialized medicine, immediate across the board debt forgiveness, etc, etc, etc.

Do you actually believe that progressives believe in freedom, or democracy, or the freedom of the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism? :shock:

The truth is, by definition, progressives don't believe in ANY of those things. Freedom? yeah maybe in the movie they want to see or the freedom to pick the color of the shirt they want to wear. Other than that, they want the government to tell you what type of car to drive, where to live, how much money you can make, what to eat, what type of energy we can consume, and the list goes on and on. In the 1920's, progressives had prohibition and the temperance movement. Today, their new temperance movement is smoking.

Government cronyism is the foundation on which progressivism was built. After all, the definition of progressivism is to bring social , political, and economic change through government action. :ohno:

You are right about one thing though, my understanding of history evolves everyday. Don't worry, if you put in the effort, yours will too. You won't be this ignorant forever.....hopefully. :thumb:
You're confusing early 20th century progressives with your boogey man of 21st century progressives. Or perhaps you're confusing progressives with your boogey liberals. Your posts and understanding are kind of hard to follow here. But keep up the good work, it's all fascinating! :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by kalm »

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote: Says the guy who believes the 'robber baron' myth. Thank you, kalm Jennings Bryan. :roll:

I never claimed 'progressives' were anti-technology. :suspicious:

OWS is the epicenter of the 21 century 'progressive' movement. Have you read their so-called list of demands? These are the things that make the mouths of hard core 'progressives' water...the demand for Congress to institute a guaranteed 'living wage' regardless of employment, single payer socialized medicine, immediate across the board debt forgiveness, etc, etc, etc.

Do you actually believe that progressives believe in freedom, or democracy, or the freedom of the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism? :shock:

The truth is, by definition, progressives don't believe in ANY of those things. Freedom? yeah maybe in the movie they want to see or the freedom to pick the color of the shirt they want to wear. Other than that, they want the government to tell you what type of car to drive, where to live, how much money you can make, what to eat, what type of energy we can consume, and the list goes on and on. In the 1920's, progressives had prohibition and the temperance movement. Today, their new temperance movement is smoking.

Government cronyism is the foundation on which progressivism was built. After all, the definition of progressivism is to bring social , political, and economic change through government action. :ohno:

You are right about one thing though, my understanding of history evolves everyday. Don't worry, if you put in the effort, yours will too. You won't be this ignorant forever.....hopefully. :thumb:
You're confusing early 20th century progressives with your boogey man of 21st century progressives. Or perhaps you're confusing progressives with your bogey man liberals. Your posts and understanding are kind of hard to follow here. But keep up the good work, it's all fascinating! :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by D1B »

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote: The thread and linked article were about the history of the progressive movement. You tried to make a funny about how progressives were anti-technology and posted a picture which I even acknowledged as decent smack. You then brought OWS into the discussion. :ugeek:

Progressivism was not historically nor is it currently anti-technology. It was mostly about anti-monopolism, something that a card carrying conk such as yourself should be all for - you know - freedom, democracy, freedom in the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism. :coffee:

Your understanding of history will improve as your reading comprehension improves. Keep efforting. :kisswink:
Says the guy who believes the 'robber baron' myth. Thank you, kalm Jennings Bryan. :roll:

I never claimed 'progressives' were anti-technology. :suspicious:

OWS is the epicenter of the 21 century 'progressive' movement. Have you read their so-called list of demands? These are the things that make the mouths of hard core 'progressives' water...the demand for Congress to institute a guaranteed 'living wage' regardless of employment, single payer socialized medicine, immediate across the board debt forgiveness, etc, etc, etc.

Do you actually believe that progressives believe in freedom, or democracy, or the freedom of the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism? :shock:

The truth is, by definition, progressives don't believe in ANY of those things. Freedom? yeah maybe in the movie they want to see or the freedom to pick the color of the shirt they want to wear. Other than that, they want the government to tell you what type of car to drive, where to live, how much money you can make, what to eat, what type of energy we can consume, and the list goes on and on. In the 1920's, progressives had prohibition and the temperance movement. Today, their new temperance movement is smoking.

Government cronyism is the foundation on which progressivism was built. After all, the definition of progressivism is to bring social , political, and economic change through government action. :ohno:

You are right about one thing though, my understanding of history evolves everyday. Don't worry, if you put in the effort, yours will too. You won't be this ignorant forever.....hopefully. :thumb:
Classic Conk 101

1. Find a name for em
2. Villify the name so the retard conk voter base/meth producers who do our dirty work can understand
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: When it all started going downhill

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote: Says the guy who believes the 'robber baron' myth. Thank you, kalm Jennings Bryan. :roll:

I never claimed 'progressives' were anti-technology. :suspicious:

OWS is the epicenter of the 21 century 'progressive' movement. Have you read their so-called list of demands? These are the things that make the mouths of hard core 'progressives' water...the demand for Congress to institute a guaranteed 'living wage' regardless of employment, single payer socialized medicine, immediate across the board debt forgiveness, etc, etc, etc.

Do you actually believe that progressives believe in freedom, or democracy, or the freedom of the market not being diminished by entrenched power and government cronyism? :shock:

The truth is, by definition, progressives don't believe in ANY of those things. Freedom? yeah maybe in the movie they want to see or the freedom to pick the color of the shirt they want to wear. Other than that, they want the government to tell you what type of car to drive, where to live, how much money you can make, what to eat, what type of energy we can consume, and the list goes on and on. In the 1920's, progressives had prohibition and the temperance movement. Today, their new temperance movement is smoking.

Government cronyism is the foundation on which progressivism was built. After all, the definition of progressivism is to bring social , political, and economic change through government action. :ohno:

You are right about one thing though, my understanding of history evolves everyday. Don't worry, if you put in the effort, yours will too. You won't be this ignorant forever.....hopefully. :thumb:
You're confusing early 20th century progressives with your boogey man of 21st century progressives. Or perhaps you're confusing progressives with your boogey liberals. Your posts and understanding are kind of hard to follow here. But keep up the good work, it's all fascinating! :thumb:
Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse you so much.
Over time, it'll start sinking in...just don't give up on us. We're rooting for you. :kisswink:
Post Reply