This shat just went next level

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:21 pm

Ibanez wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
But KAL 007 was under a different time and circumstances.

But what would Putin possibly have to gain by shooting down a civilian jumbo jet? Alleged Russian actions in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine by advisors and Spetsnaz, and the arming of the rebels, had fallen off of front page worldwide news news lately. This puts it back on front page news around the world and will make it that much harder for Russia to achieve it goals of annexing eastern Ukraine. With lots of western Europeans and Americans on that plane, there is likely to be much less appeasement among Western Europe towards Russia. And who knows, maybe Obama, after being asked by Ukraine for arms, will give them more than MREs.

And what would the rebels have to gain by intentionally shooting it down? Nothing but worldwide condemnation, making it that much harder to achieve their separatist goals in Donetsk..
agreed. No good would come from downing a civilian plane.

We have yet to explore the possibility of aliens.

Waiting to hear Expandos's take...

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:23 pm

I heard/saw a report that our military was watching and is analyzing data. Report said that they will be able to tell us what kind of missile it was and where it was launched from. On the what kind of missile it was something about the "heat signature."

Course it was on Fox News so I guess we have to dismiss it. Jennifer Griffin.

Post by **kalm** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:26 pm

Oh. Missed the part about US citizens being killed. Fuck those commies, let's gettem!

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:29 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
Waiting to hear Expandos's take...

Anniversary of TWA 800 - according to conspiracy theories... shot down by the US Navy.

Obviously not coincidental.

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:30 pm

kalm wrote:Oh. Missed the part about US citizens being killed. Fuck those commies, let's gettem!

CNN originally reported that... but, now they've backtracked. No Americans confirmed.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:31 pm

This thread gives a very clear indication of the differences between Liberals and conservatives...
Very entertaining

Post by **kalm** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:32 pm

Skjellyfetti wrote:
kalm wrote:Oh. Missed the part about US citizens being killed. Fuck those commies, let's gettem!
CNN originally reported that... but, now they've backtracked. No Americans confirmed.

It would have been an odd itinerary.

Sorry Russia.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:34 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: Engages the guilty country? What does that mean? There are only so many potential culprits here. Choose a scenario for each and tell me what "engages" means.

Engages (in recent history) means carpet bombing a completely unrelated nation...
So I pick Poland

But I'll take any one of the "stans" as a second option

We haven't carpet bombed anyone since the 1st Gulf War, and that was relatively small scale.

Post by **93henfan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:36 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

Engages (in recent history) means carpet bombing a completely unrelated nation...
So I pick Poland

But I'll take any one of the "stans" as a second option
We haven't truly carpet bombed anyone since Vietnam...much more high tech now..

Actually, we did carpet bomb in support of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:37 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

Engages (in recent history) means carpet bombing a completely unrelated nation...
So I pick Poland

But I'll take any one of the "stans" as a second option
We haven't truly carpet bombed anyone since Vietnam...much more high tech now..

Riiiiiight.... Sure
Except our Canadian allies in Iraq would TOTALLY disagree with your ridiculous claim
As we managed to "precision" bomb them a few times

Keep dreamin' and drinking the kool-aid

Post by **93henfan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:45 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

Engages (in recent history) means carpet bombing a completely unrelated nation...
So I pick Poland

But I'll take any one of the "stans" as a second option
We haven't carpet bombed anyone since the 1st Gulf War, and that was relatively small scale.

Still wrong.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:45 pm

93henfan wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
We haven't truly carpet bombed anyone since Vietnam...much more high tech now..
Actually, we did carpet bomb in support of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.

True. I was editing at 8:36, the exact same time as your post, to say since Gulf War I.

Afghanistan in 01' was even smaller scale- from what I read was never more than a handful of bombers at a time.

Post by **93henfan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:46 pm

We were running B-52s all over Afghanistan in October 2001. Carpet bombistan!

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:49 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
93henfan wrote:
Actually, we did carpet bomb in support of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.
True. I was editing at 8:36, the exact same time as your post, to say since Gulf War I.

Afghanistan in 01' was even smaller scale- from what I read was never more than a handful of bombers at a time.

And ^ only a few of our allies were bombed during these runs...

Post by **93henfan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:49 pm

Seeing the B-52 contrails circling made the Taliban shit themselves before the bombs even rained on them, and was also very therapeutic for the nation to see while the embers at the WTC were still smoking.

I'm surprised you don't remember all of that. It was only 12 and a half years ago.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 5:59 pm

Chizzang wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
We haven't truly carpet bombed anyone since Vietnam...much more high tech now..

Riiiiiight.... Sure
Except our Canadian allies in Iraq would TOTALLY disagree with your ridiculous claim
As we managed to "precision" bomb them a few times

Keep dreamin' and drinking the kool-aid

That wasn't Iraq. Was Afghanistan. And that wasn't carpet bombing. Those bombs were right on target. Was a tragic mistaken identity/friendly fire incident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarnak_Farm_incident" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:07 pm

Also, lots of conclusions being jumped to about Russia obviously providing the separatists with AA weapons.

They easily could have the weapons from Ukrainian bases they've seized.

example:
http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_06_2 ... tion-1561/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:09 pm

93henfan wrote:We were running B-52s all over Afghanistan in October 2001. Carpet bombistan!

A few bombers here. A few bombers there. I initially stated "truly carpet bombed" when I should have wrote "large scale carpet bombed"- dozens of bombers at a time. My bad.

Post by **93henfan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:11 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
93henfan wrote:We were running B-52s all over Afghanistan in October 2001. Carpet bombistan!
A few bombers here. A few bombers there. I initially stated "truly carpet bombed" when I should have wrote "large scale carpet bombed"- dozens of bombers at a time. My bad.

Backpedal #3. I hope you're done.

Post by **Col Hogan** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:14 pm

93henfan wrote:We were running B-52s all over Afghanistan in October 2001. Carpet bombistan!

Just to be very correct, carpet bombing uses "dumb" or unguided bombs...last really used in Gulf War I...

In Afghanistan, even 12 years ago, B-52s were dropping guided munitions...not a perfect solution, but much less collateral damage...

FCS PATRIOTS · Post by **FCS PATRIOTS** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:16 pm

Chizzang wrote:This thread gives a very clear indication of the differences between humans and mongrels.Very entertaining

FIFY

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:23 pm

Chizzang wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
We haven't truly carpet bombed anyone since Vietnam...much more high tech now..

Riiiiiight.... Sure
Except our Canadian allies in Iraq would TOTALLY disagree with your ridiculous claim
As we managed to "precision" bomb them a few times

Keep dreamin' and drinking the kool-aid

Tarnak wasn't carpet bombed.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:26 pm

93henfan wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
A few bombers here. A few bombers there. I initially stated "truly carpet bombed" when I should have wrote "large scale carpet bombed"- dozens of bombers at a time. My bad.
Backpedal #3. I hope you're done.

No. I stand by my Gulf War I assertion. Was only 1 backpedal, from Vietnam to Gulf War I.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:28 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

Riiiiiight.... Sure
Except our Canadian allies in Iraq would TOTALLY disagree with your ridiculous claim
As we managed to "precision" bomb them a few times

Keep dreamin' and drinking the kool-aid
That wasn't Iraq. Was Afghanistan. And that wasn't carpet bombing. Those bombs were right on target. Was a tragic mistaken identity/friendly fire incident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarnak_Farm_incident" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

yeah I know all about it... there were dozens of examples of "precision" bombing killing our allies and our own troops - I just like to bring them up when ditto heads talk about American "precision" bombing whilst simultaneously denying that we were indeed also carpet bombing...

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:28 pm

93henfan wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
A few bombers here. A few bombers there. I initially stated "truly carpet bombed" when I should have wrote "large scale carpet bombed"- dozens of bombers at a time. My bad.
Backpedal #3. I hope you're done.

Give him time. Eventually you say what he means.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level

Re: This shat just went next level