Typical
Choose to be a victim and I guess we can get rid of you one at a time. This is so senseless.......not owning a gun that is.



If the family didn't own a gun, how did her husband shoot her..?ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:http://madworldnews.com/watch-woman-sho ... phone-911/
Typical
Choose to be a victim and I guess we can get rid of you one at a time. This is so senseless.......not owning a gun that is.



ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:With his gun


Im not telling her anything it's her choice to be dead.Chizzang wrote:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:With his gun![]()
So you're saying she needs to basically walk around in her own home like this...


So a guy shoots his wife with a gun that was in the house - and she chose to be dead - is your interpretation of the series of eventsALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Chizzang wrote:
![]()
So you're saying she needs to basically walk around in her own home like this...
Im not telling her anything it's her choice to be dead.



So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:In any home where you do not want to be a victim there should be a minimum of 5 guns staged in locations throughout the house/garage as well as the one you are carrying. (I have 7 handguns around the house and garage, 3 each in my car and truck) this isn't including rifles and several other handguns I have in the safe.
She didn't have one she can deal with her choice.
Now just stop with your little game, it's not cute and you look foolish.

I have been saying that for 5 years, they should have to pay for first responders and clean up. Now that the government can force you into something like healthcare there is no reason you libs should be forced into another tax, you love themkalm wrote:I think we should tax people for not having guns.


No problemChizzang wrote:So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:In any home where you do not want to be a victim there should be a minimum of 5 guns staged in locations throughout the house/garage as well as the one you are carrying. (I have 7 handguns around the house and garage, 3 each in my car and truck) this isn't including rifles and several other handguns I have in the safe.
She didn't have one she can deal with her choice.
Now just stop with your little game, it's not cute and you look foolish.![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)


Chizzang wrote:So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:In any home where you do not want to be a victim there should be a minimum of 5 guns staged in locations throughout the house/garage as well as the one you are carrying. (I have 7 handguns around the house and garage, 3 each in my car and truck) this isn't including rifles and several other handguns I have in the safe.
She didn't have one she can deal with her choice.
Now just stop with your little game, it's not cute and you look foolish.![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)

Kill 'em now or kill 'em later.dbackjon wrote:Chizzang wrote:
So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.


TrueAZGrizFan wrote:Kill 'em now or kill 'em later.dbackjon wrote:
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.

Neither is working well enough. We need WWIII in a big way.dbackjon wrote:Chizzang wrote:
So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.

You forgot spreading the gay.dbackjon wrote:Chizzang wrote:
So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.

Putin and Obama are working feverishly on that as we speak.CAA Flagship wrote:Neither is working well enough. We need WWIII in a big way.dbackjon wrote:
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.


Exactly.Chizzang wrote:TrueAZGrizFan wrote:
Kill 'em now or kill 'em later.
I'm sure it's more gratifying to shoot a teenager (we'll need to check with Zimmerman on this)


That would bekalm wrote:You forgot spreading the gay.dbackjon wrote:
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.

FIFY, our house boy doesn't even know where Crimea isAZGrizFan wrote:Putin is working feverishly on that as we speak.CAA Flagship wrote: Neither is working well enough. We need WWIII in a big way.


One has a choice the other doesn't. You know.....it's the same thing just like income tax and grazing feesdbackjon wrote:Chizzang wrote:
So am mom with 2 kids needs to have no less than 5 hand guns stashed around the house...![]()
Thanks again (I feel so foolish)
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.


more sporting, they're harder to hit.Chizzang wrote:TrueAZGrizFan wrote:
Kill 'em now or kill 'em later.
I'm sure it's more gratifying to shoot a teenager (we'll need to check with Zimmerman on this)

CID1990 wrote:That would bekalm wrote:
You forgot spreading the gay.
"paint the world gay"

They are both choices.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:One has a choice the other doesn't. You know.....it's the same thing just like income tax and grazing feesdbackjon wrote:
Libs: Limit population by abortion
Conks: Limit population growth by increasing the gun supply.

Really? The child that dies by being aborted had a choice?dbackjon wrote:They are both choices.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
One has a choice the other doesn't. You know.....it's the same thing just like income tax and grazing fees![]()
And both choices whether to pay or not. Be legal or not.
