The Best Ever Layoff Letter

[SuperHornet]

ROFL.

[∞∞∞]

Unless at-will, this is illegal...

Also, this letter and ones similar have been debunked time and time again.

[houndawg]

Unless at-will, this is illegal...

Also, this letter and ones similar have been debunked time and time again.

Its just something for SH to read while fondling her bagina, she probably wrote it herself.

[grizzaholic]

Unless at-will, this is illegal...

Also, this letter and ones similar have been debunked time and time again.

I don't see anything wrong with that policy.

[houndawg]

Unless at-will, this is illegal...

Also, this letter and ones similar have been debunked time and time again.

I don't see anything wrong with that policy.

The story is apocryphal. Typical sore loser tea party stuff.

[tribe_pride]

Unless at-will, this is illegal...

Also, this letter and ones similar have been debunked time and time again.

Most employees in this country are employees at will.

[JohnStOnge]

You know guys, regardless of the question of whether or not the letter is real, people ARE losing their jobs due to the Affordable Care Act.

Love it if you want. Say the positives outweigh the negatives. But this IS happening. People may not be writing letters like that. But it's too bad they can't. It really is the case that the FIRST people who lose their jobs as a result of the Act should be those who voted for Obama.

[SuperHornet]

You know guys, regardless of the question of whether or not the letter is real, people ARE losing their jobs due to the Affordable Care Act.

Love it if you want. Say the positives outweigh the negatives. But this IS happening. People may not be writing letters like that. But it's too bad they can't. It really is the case that the FIRST people who lose their jobs as a result of the Act should be those who voted for Obama.

[Ibanez]

Yeah, this isn't real. The first tip off is that it's a crumpled piece of paper, that looks anything but official, and is stuck to a refrigerator. The second clue, firing based off of political affiliation is illegal and being so blatant isn't something a CEO would do. So, this is stupid. But then again, They did start it.

[Chizzang]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

[houndawg]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

This. Its a great opportunity to lighten the load and blame somebody else.

John is wrong, as usual, nobody around here is saying they got fired because of Obamacare.

[ASUMountaineer]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

I agree with this. The GOP should quit trying to take down Obamacare and try taking back the Senate and the WH if they really want to make changes. Methinks it's easier to be the "Party of Blame," than the "Party of Action." No wonder people are so apathetic.

[CAA Flagship]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

Dead weight = Donks.

Why do the Republicans have to offer anything?

[Grizalltheway]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

Dead weight = Donks.

Why do the Republicans have to offer anything?

Because that's what you do when you're opposed to an idea; you come up with something better to replace it. Repubs would rather act like petulent children.

[kalm]

A properly run effective company fires dead weight.... (period)
Anything other than that is a poorly run business
So in that regard - who cares

Secondly:
The Affordable Care act would be GONE by now if the Republican Party had anything else to offer

The End

Dead weight = Donks.

Why do the Republicans have to offer anything?

Yeah, let's just keep the same over-priced, inefficient system that's really good at bankrupting patients while lining the pockets of Pharma and big insurance...........wait...................

[CAA Flagship]

Dead weight = Donks.

Why do the Republicans have to offer anything?

Yeah, let's just keep the same over-priced, inefficient system that's really good at bankrupting patients while lining the pockets of Pharma and big insurance...........wait...................

Whoa the fuck up. Who said Obamacare was about efficiency? It is about access to healthcare for the poor, the lazy, and all the scumbags who chose not to have their own healthcare and have been statistical pawns in this debate. There is no way this will be more efficient. You know it too.

[Grizalltheway]

Yeah, let's just keep the same over-priced, inefficient system that's really good at bankrupting patients while lining the pockets of Pharma and big insurance...........wait...................

Whoa the fuck up. Who said Obamacare was about efficiency? It is about access to healthcare for the poor, the lazy, and all the scumbags who chose not to have their own healthcare and have been statistical pawns in this debate. There is no way this will be more efficient. You know it too.

I notice you didn't deny his points about our current system.

[Ibanez]

I usually Top Shelf the executive toilets.

[CAA Flagship]

Dead weight = Donks.

Why do the Republicans have to offer anything?

Because that's what you do when you're opposed to an idea; you come up with something better to replace it. Repubs would rather act like petulent children.

#1 This is not the economic time to do anything different.
#2 Just because one side proposes something, the other side doesn't have to continue down the wrong road to try to improve on it. What if the Republicans proposed lowering the drinking age to 18? Would the Dems come up with a plan that is somewhere in the middle of that and the status quo? No. They would just sit back and vote against it.

[CAA Flagship]

Whoa the fuck up. Who said Obamacare was about efficiency? It is about access to healthcare for the poor, the lazy, and all the scumbags who chose not to have their own healthcare and have been statistical pawns in this debate. There is no way this will be more efficient. You know it too.

I notice you didn't deny his points about our current system.

Of course it is broken. But it can't be fixed in this economy. Wait 5 years or so when it can be absorbed in better times.

And then do something different than what is proposed.

[Chizzang]

I notice you didn't deny his points about our current system.

Of course it is broken. But it can't be fixed in this economy. Wait 5 years or so when it can be absorbed in better times.

And then do something different than what is proposed.

Hello... is that you John Boehner
Yes we know you have absolutely no ideas and no plan and no clue

Thanks for confirmation

[SuperHornet]

I agree with this. The GOP should quit trying to take down Obamacare and try taking back the Senate and the WH if they really want to make changes. Methinks it's easier to be the "Party of Blame," than the "Party of Action." No wonder people are so apathetic.

It's not a matter of either/or. It's a matter of chronology. Take back the Senate/WH, THEN eliminate this unconstitutional Commie law.

Mark my words. That is EXACTLY what's going to happen.

[kalm]

Whoa the fuck up. Who said Obamacare was about efficiency? It is about access to healthcare for the poor, the lazy, and all the scumbags who chose not to have their own healthcare and have been statistical pawns in this debate. There is no way this will be more efficient. You know it too.

I notice you didn't deny his points about our current system.

This. I never said Obamacare was efficient. It's not. But the current system is horrendously bad. Another 5 years won't change that.

[JohnStOnge]

John is wrong, as usual, nobody around here is saying they got fired because of Obamacare.

Oh, well "around here" my wife just told me within the last week that a client of hers lost his job because of it. He was associated with my wife due to a rental property. He borrowed money from his brother to put down a deposit. Then after the deal was done his employer called him in and told him they were laying him off. They laid off 8 people due to the Affordable Care Act and he was one of them.

It's happening. Fine if you want to argue that the overall picture is a net positive. But don't think that people aren't losing their jobs as a result of the Affordable Care Act. It IS happening.

[ASUMountaineer]

I agree with this. The GOP should quit trying to take down Obamacare and try taking back the Senate and the WH if they really want to make changes. Methinks it's easier to be the "Party of Blame," than the "Party of Action." No wonder people are so apathetic.

It's not a matter of either/or. It's a matter of chronology. Take back the Senate/WH, THEN eliminate this unconstitutional Commie law.

Mark my words. That is EXACTLY what's going to happen.

Wow, you are dense. Just because you're poor at reading comprehension doesn't mean something is BS. Especially because we both said the same thing: the GOP can't take down Obamacare without taking back the Senate and the WH, clueless wonder.

The GOP is shooting themselves in the foot right now by shutting down the government and not preventing Obamacare from going into effect. They are walking a line right now that could lead to not winning the Senate or the WH, and ensuring that Obamacare remains the "law of the land."