NDSU and the WAC

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
BigSkyBears
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
I am a fan of: Northern Colorado

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by BigSkyBears »

Gil Dobie wrote:
BigSkyBears wrote:
Yeah, but outside of the state of ND and non-fcs fans, no one knows who you guys are. What's the appeal??
I live in the Twin Cities and they know us in Minnesota, and neighboring Wisconsin after beating the Gophers in Football and Badgers in Basketball. They know Denver and CC in Minneapolis via hockey, but not many know Northern Colorado here.
Yeah, but that's in the general geographic area. I know no one knows UNC and never claimed that.
Image
BigSkyBears
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
I am a fan of: Northern Colorado

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by BigSkyBears »

FargoBison wrote:
BigSkyBears wrote:

Yeah, but outside of the state of ND and non-fcs fans, no one knows who you guys are. What's the appeal??
When did Sac State, PSU, and Texas State become household names? NDSU is well supported, has a solid academic reputation and is ready to go now. I'm sure more than a few WAC presidents know who we are.

I am not saying NDSU is even close to getting talked about by the WAC, but your statement doesn't make sense when you consider the alternatives. I'd argue the only school with the kind of appeal you are talking about is UC Davis because of their stellar academic reputation.
Just because those schools are interested in the WAC doesn't mean the WAC is interested in them. I know Sac St is already a member is some sports, but I still don't think they'll get a chance to move up.
Image
User avatar
Herky
Level1
Level1
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State
A.K.A.: StungAlum
Location: Anywhere but Davis!

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Herky »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:The way things are going now the conference most likely to not exist is the B12 minus 6 then another 2 and would be left with 4.

The question is A-who wants to move up from FCS? Texas St. is the only 100% yes now. B-Who can afford it? C-Who has the best facilities for the WAC?

Montana needs to add 2 sports and voted down a fee hike
Cal Poly needs a better basketball arena and needs to add a 4,000 seats to the football stadium. Can they afford the move?
UC Davis needs 5,000 more seats for football. Can they afford the move?
Sacramento St. needs a better basketball arena. Can they afford the move?
Portland St. needs a better basketball arena or play all their games at the Rose Garden. Can they afford the move?
Wanless just came out and said that a move to the WAC is definitely something he and the Pres are considering, they said the additional $5 million a year for schollies etc. were not a problem as athletic fees were raised last year. Tha AD is saying that if the opportunitiy presents itself, they're going for it.

As for the arena, there are options available.

Additional revenue will also be earned through the rental of Hornet Stadium to the UFL team the Sacramento Mountain Lions. A contract for them to use the facilities is in place and they are calling Hornet Stadium their home now.
If it looks like a cow, smells like a cow, and moo's like a cow, it's a UC Davis coed.
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21615
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

Herky wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote:The way things are going now the conference most likely to not exist is the B12 minus 6 then another 2 and would be left with 4.

The question is A-who wants to move up from FCS? Texas St. is the only 100% yes now. B-Who can afford it? C-Who has the best facilities for the WAC?

Montana needs to add 2 sports and voted down a fee hike
Cal Poly needs a better basketball arena and needs to add a 4,000 seats to the football stadium. Can they afford the move?
UC Davis needs 5,000 more seats for football. Can they afford the move?
Sacramento St. needs a better basketball arena. Can they afford the move?
Portland St. needs a better basketball arena or play all their games at the Rose Garden. Can they afford the move?
Wanless just came out and said that a move to the WAC is definitely something he and the Pres are considering, they said the additional $5 million a year for schollies etc. were not a problem as athletic fees were raised last year. Tha AD is saying that if the opportunitiy presents itself, they're going for it.

As for the arena, there are options available.

Additional revenue will also be earned through the rental of Hornet Stadium to the UFL team the Sacramento Mountain Lions.
I would think that a lot of revenue could also be culled from that woman's team that SH is always talking bout too. They're apparently quite a show. :lol:
User avatar
Herky
Level1
Level1
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State
A.K.A.: StungAlum
Location: Anywhere but Davis!

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Herky »

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
Herky wrote:
Wanless just came out and said that a move to the WAC is definitely something he and the Pres are considering, they said the additional $5 million a year for schollies etc. were not a problem as athletic fees were raised last year. Tha AD is saying that if the opportunitiy presents itself, they're going for it.

As for the arena, there are options available.

Additional revenue will also be earned through the rental of Hornet Stadium to the UFL team the Sacramento Mountain Lions.
I would think that a lot of revenue could also be culled from that woman's team that SH is always talking bout too. They're apparently quite a show. :lol:
Sshhhh, any mention of the Sirens and SuperHornet comes running to chime in. :lol: :ohno:
If it looks like a cow, smells like a cow, and moo's like a cow, it's a UC Davis coed.
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21615
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

Herky wrote:
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: I would think that a lot of revenue could also be culled from that woman's team that SH is always talking bout too. They're apparently quite a show. :lol:
Sshhhh, any mention of the Sirens and SuperHornet comes running to chime in. :lol: :ohno:
He's got two other threads on em' on here already that I'm trying to keep him busy on to keep that shit off of these ones but I couldn't resist the revenue comment. :lol:
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Herky wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote:The way things are going now the conference most likely to not exist is the B12 minus 6 then another 2 and would be left with 4.

The question is A-who wants to move up from FCS? Texas St. is the only 100% yes now. B-Who can afford it? C-Who has the best facilities for the WAC?

Montana needs to add 2 sports and voted down a fee hike
Cal Poly needs a better basketball arena and needs to add a 4,000 seats to the football stadium. Can they afford the move?
UC Davis needs 5,000 more seats for football. Can they afford the move?
Sacramento St. needs a better basketball arena. Can they afford the move?
Portland St. needs a better basketball arena or play all their games at the Rose Garden. Can they afford the move?
Wanless just came out and said that a move to the WAC is definitely something he and the Pres are considering, they said the additional $5 million a year for schollies etc. were not a problem as athletic fees were raised last year. Tha AD is saying that if the opportunitiy presents itself, they're going for it.

As for the arena, there are options available.

Additional revenue will also be earned through the rental of Hornet Stadium to the UFL team the Sacramento Mountain Lions. A contract for them to use the facilities is in place and they are calling Hornet Stadium their home now.
So it seems Texas St. and Sac St. are willing to join the WAC. :thumb:
Image
User avatar
Green Cookie Monster
Level1
Level1
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:51 am
I am a fan of: Sacramento State
Location: Pinehurst, NC

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Green Cookie Monster »

Herky wrote:
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: I would think that a lot of revenue could also be culled from that woman's team that SH is always talking bout too. They're apparently quite a show. :lol:
Sshhhh, any mention of the Sirens and SuperHornet comes running to chime in. :lol: :ohno:
Yes, please don't provoke SH and his Sirens.

The students voted and passed to tax themselves for a new 6-8K seat events center that is part of the Alex Spanos Sports Complex. The 'Well' is a 150K sqft recreation facility set to open Sept.2, once that is complete work can be started on securing the rest of the funds for the event center. Labor and construction material haven't been this low in decades, so that is advantageous.

Since I am an alum of both Sac State and TXST, I am in the envious position to win either way if something happens. I just can't see TXST in the league if La. Tech leaves, travel for the non-revenue sports would be killer. With the state of the overall economy, I'd think prudent travel expense would be a top qualifier.

When did TXST or UTSA become household names? A few years ago we were proudly called SWT and having lived in San Marcos for four years never even thought or heard about UTSA.

As for North Dakota State, they may as well be located on Mars.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by SDHornet »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:The way things are going now the conference most likely to not exist is the B12 minus 6 then another 2 and would be left with 4.

The question is A-who wants to move up from FCS? Texas St. is the only 100% yes now. B-Who can afford it? C-Who has the best facilities for the WAC?

Montana needs to add 2 sports and voted down a fee hike
Cal Poly needs a better basketball arena and needs to add a 4,000 seats to the football stadium. Can they afford the move?
UC Davis needs 5,000 more seats for football. Can they afford the move?
Sacramento St. needs a better basketball arena. Can they afford the move?
Portland St. needs a better basketball arena or play all their games at the Rose Garden. Can they afford the move?
Sac State can "rent" Arco Arena (where the Kings play) to sell the notion of a Sac State move to the WAC. Ultimately, Sac State needs to build its 6-8k events center (which is already on the books, it just needs to find funding). Seeing as President Gonzales already forcibly raised student fees for athletics about a year ago, I see him having no qualms about doing it again to fund the FBS move. :twocents:
User avatar
kemajic
Level2
Level2
Posts: 796
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:43 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: Kemajic

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by kemajic »

BigSkyBears wrote:
FargoBison wrote:
Just because those schools are interested in the WAC doesn't mean the WAC is interested in them. I know Sac St is already a member is some sports, but I still don't think they'll get a chance to move up.
Have to agree. I doubt the WAC will need to stoop to teams that win one of three in FCS and don't draw. The WAC will have better options. Sure, the CA boys want their bus league, but they don't have all the votes.
"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe." - Andy Rooney
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by SDHornet »

kemajic wrote:
BigSkyBears wrote:
Have to agree. I doubt the WAC will need to stoop to teams that win one of three in FCS and don't draw. The WAC will have better options. Sure, the CA boys want their bus league, but they don't have all the votes.
I think it will all depend on how badly the WAC gets raided. That in turn will determine the level of desperation of the WAC to stay alive...which could potentially open up more invites to schools who aren't ready for a move.
User avatar
Herky
Level1
Level1
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State
A.K.A.: StungAlum
Location: Anywhere but Davis!

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Herky »

kemajic wrote:
BigSkyBears wrote:
Have to agree. I doubt the WAC will need to stoop to teams that win one of three in FCS and don't draw. The WAC will have better options. Sure, the CA boys want their bus league, but they don't have all the votes.
A quality football program does not necessarily equal a quality athletics department, its taken as a whole, sorry. :coffee:
If it looks like a cow, smells like a cow, and moo's like a cow, it's a UC Davis coed.
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Boise St. is joining the Mountain West finally. Western FCS is on the clock for the WAC
Image
User avatar
Green Cookie Monster
Level1
Level1
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:51 am
I am a fan of: Sacramento State
Location: Pinehurst, NC

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Green Cookie Monster »

Image

:dance:
Image
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Green Cookie Monster wrote:Image

:dance:
Is joining the Big West? I kid I kid
Image
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by mainejeff »

The WAC is not going to survive.

Fresno State is bound for the Mountain West.

Louisiana Tech???....... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Who does that leave? :roll:
Go Black Bears!
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by AZGrizFan »

SloStang wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote:The way things are going now the conference most likely to not exist is the B12 minus 6 then another 2 and would be left with 4.

The question is A-who wants to move up from FCS? Texas St. is the only 100% yes now. B-Who can afford it? C-Who has the best facilities for the WAC?

Montana needs to add 2 sports and voted down a fee hike
Cal Poly needs a better basketball arena and needs to add a 4,000 seats to the football stadium. Can they afford the move?
UC Davis needs 5,000 more seats for football. Can they afford the move?
Sacramento St. needs a better basketball arena. Can they afford the move?
Portland St. needs a better basketball arena or play all their games at the Rose Garden. Can they afford the move?
The better question is can they afford not to? This opportunity may not come by again for a long, long time and life in the FCS is tough on the west coast and getting tougher every year.
THIS. :nod: :nod: :nod:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Best long term solution is for Cal Poly, UC Davis to join the WAC because GWC only has 5 members(No AQ) and S.Utah is probably next in line to go to the Sky if Sac St. or Montana or Portland St. leaves. N.Dakota and S.Dakota may get MVFC invites and the GWC is not allowed to bring in new mebers from D-II because they don't qualify as a D-I conference.

Sac St. and Montana have homes so they don't need to move. Texas St., Lamar, UTSA all have a hard on for FBS.
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by AZGrizFan »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:Best long term solution is for Cal Poly, UC Davis to join the WAC because GWC only has 5 members(No AQ) and S.Utah is probably next in line to go to the Sky if Sac St. or Montana or Portland St. leaves. N.Dakota and S.Dakota may get MVFC invites and the GWC is not allowed to bring in new mebers from D-II because they don't qualify as a D-I conference.

Sac St. and Montana have homes so they don't need to move. Texas St., Lamar, UTSA all have a hard on for FBS.
Given their location, their size and the success of some of their other sports, I think Cal Poly is a no-brainer. :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by mainejeff »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:Best long term solution is for Cal Poly, UC Davis to join the WAC because GWC only has 5 members(No AQ) and S.Utah is probably next in line to go to the Sky if Sac St. or Montana or Portland St. leaves. N.Dakota and S.Dakota may get MVFC invites and the GWC is not allowed to bring in new mebers from D-II because they don't qualify as a D-I conference.

Sac St. and Montana have homes so they don't need to move. Texas St., Lamar, UTSA all have a hard on for FBS.
What WAC?

The one that will include Idaho, New Mexico State, and Utah State when all is said and done?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Go Black Bears!
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by AZGrizFan »

mainejeff wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote:Best long term solution is for Cal Poly, UC Davis to join the WAC because GWC only has 5 members(No AQ) and S.Utah is probably next in line to go to the Sky if Sac St. or Montana or Portland St. leaves. N.Dakota and S.Dakota may get MVFC invites and the GWC is not allowed to bring in new mebers from D-II because they don't qualify as a D-I conference.

Sac St. and Montana have homes so they don't need to move. Texas St., Lamar, UTSA all have a hard on for FBS.
What WAC?

The one that will include Idaho, New Mexico State, and Utah State when all is said and done?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
The only team leaving is Boise State. And even Boise State paid their dues for several years in a lower level FBS division before getting this opportunity.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by mainejeff »

AZGrizFan wrote:
mainejeff wrote:
What WAC?

The one that will include Idaho, New Mexico State, and Utah State when all is said and done?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
The only team leaving is Boise State. And even Boise State paid their dues for several years in a lower level FBS division before getting this opportunity.
Obviously, you aren't following what is going on.

:coffee:
Go Black Bears!
JBB
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4312
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by JBB »

Its not all about football, but NDSU is one of the best FCS teams in the land. Its about other things too. Take a look at this ranking for the Directors Cup. NDSU is the highest ranking FCS program:

1. Stanford
2. North Carolina
3. Ohio State
4. Florida State
5. Penn State
6. Oklahoma State
7. Maryland
8. Cal
9. Duke
10. Virginia
11. Oklahoma
12. Southern Cal
13. Washington
14. Georgetown
14. Notre Dame
16. Michigan
16. Syracuse
18. Oregon
18. Villanova
20. Wisconsin
21. Louisville
22. Indiana
23. New Mexico
24. UCLA
25. Princeton
26. Michigan State
27. Auburn
27. Florida
29. Boston College
30. Minnesota
31. South Carolina
32. Texas
33. UConn
34. Tulsa
35. Central Florida
36. William and Mary
37. Providence
38. West Virginia
39. Va Tech
40. Illinois
41. Texas Tech
42. Creighton
43. Arkansas
44. Alabama
45. Missouri
45. North Dakota State
45. South Florida
48. Nebraska
49. Colorado
50. Delaware

http://www.nacda.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s ... leaseJan12" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Dear Lord, We come before you and humbly ask you to grant our prayer for a veil of protection to be placed over Donald Trump. May your will be done. In Jesus name we pray. Amen
youngterrier
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2709
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
I am a fan of: the option
A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
Location: a computer (duh)

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by youngterrier »

JBB wrote:Its not all about football, but NDSU is one of the best FCS teams in the land. Its about other things too. Take a look at this ranking for the Directors Cup. NDSU is the highest ranking FCS program:

1. Stanford
2. North Carolina
3. Ohio State
4. Florida State
5. Penn State
6. Oklahoma State
7. Maryland
8. Cal
9. Duke
10. Virginia
11. Oklahoma
12. Southern Cal
13. Washington
14. Georgetown
14. Notre Dame
16. Michigan
16. Syracuse
18. Oregon
18. Villanova
20. Wisconsin
21. Louisville
22. Indiana
23. New Mexico
24. UCLA
25. Princeton
26. Michigan State
27. Auburn
27. Florida
29. Boston College
30. Minnesota
31. South Carolina
32. Texas
33. UConn
34. Tulsa
35. Central Florida
36. William and Mary
37. Providence
38. West Virginia
39. Va Tech
40. Illinois
41. Texas Tech
42. Creighton
43. Arkansas
44. Alabama
45. Missouri
45. North Dakota State
45. South Florida
48. Nebraska
49. Colorado
50. Delaware

http://www.nacda.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s ... leaseJan12" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
fail
User avatar
DJH
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
I am a fan of: The MVC
Location: NORTHERN IOWA

Re: NDSU and the WAC

Post by DJH »

lol
UNI FIGHT
Post Reply