I ask the reverse. If you wanted to marry a man, why should you be prevented from doing so because of some antiquated RELIGIOUS notions?ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Very astute of you, Alfie. I agree, except for the special privileges. They want what you have, minus the vagina issues.
They already have the right to marry a chick.......and i dont have the right to marry a man...............is it possible that is so simple you cant grasp it?
You're damn lucky that you don't have to compete with us gays for your women.......you'd be fvcked, Gizz.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Very astute of you, Alfie. I agree, except for the special privileges. They want what you have, minus the vagina issues.
They already have the right to marry a chick.......and i dont have the right to marry a man...............is it possible that is so simple you cant grasp it?
mainejeff wrote:You're damn lucky that you don't have to compete with us gays for your women.......you'd be fvcked, Gizz.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
They already have the right to marry a chick.......and i dont have the right to marry a man...............is it possible that is so simple you cant grasp it?
mainejeff wrote:Good thing no one knew I was gay back then...........ASUG8 wrote:
Unless you went to private schools I'm pretty sure you got the benefit of subsidized public education as well.
OK........Gays 1, Breeders 1,347.ASUG8 wrote:mainejeff wrote:
Good thing no one knew I was gay back then...........
Yeah, if I had a dollar for every story I read about a gay kid getting a public education witheld from him/her I'd probably have......no money.
Nice leap Jeff. All I said was the government disagreed.mainejeff wrote:Well, you may be fine with that, but I'm not. I will work for equality.......no one should take money out of my wallet and put in in yours.89Hen wrote: No.... they don't. Hence the special privileges.
Thanks! I'm getting SO much for my tax dollars.mainejeff wrote:Tell me about it......they take from myself and my partner and spend it on 89Hen and his brood.ASUG8 wrote:
A government cannot spend what it doesn't take from someone else.
I couldn't agree more. Welcome to the fiscal conservative fold, mj.mainejeff wrote:Well, you may be fine with that, but I'm not. I will work for equality.......no one should take money out of my wallet and put in in yours.
Yeah right?AZGrizFan wrote:I couldn't agree more. Welcome to the fiscal conservative fold, mj.mainejeff wrote:Well, you may be fine with that, but I'm not. I will work for equality.......no one should take money out of my wallet and put in in yours.
CID1990 wrote:Yeah right?AZGrizFan wrote:
I couldn't agree more. Welcome to the fiscal conservative fold, mj.
Some very surprising things being said by MJ in this thread.
There might be a foundation for a conservative conversion here.
No, he's not Conk like that.Cluck U wrote:mj is a dumbass whether he is gay or not but everyone on GoHens knew he was gay and anyone with half a brain on any other message board knew also.
Jeff's problem is that he hates himself and so he hates anyone like him.
Oh, he also hates everyone that is not like him. Seriously, has he ever had a solid conversation with anyone about any topic on any thread on any board?
Nope.
Say, Cap'n...you didn't notice Jiff checking out your junk in the trunk?
Because its the law...............besides most of the guys dont want to marry they want to have 200-300 partners a year and be irresponsible. Its a power play sham nothing more.Cap'n Cat wrote:I ask the reverse. If you wanted to marry a man, why should you be prevented from doing so because of some antiquated RELIGIOUS notions?ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
They already have the right to marry a chick.......and i dont have the right to marry a man...............is it possible that is so simple you cant grasp it?
mainejeff wrote:You're damn lucky that you don't have to compete with us gays for your women.......you'd be fvcked, Gizz.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
They already have the right to marry a chick.......and i dont have the right to marry a man...............is it possible that is so simple you cant grasp it?
I get no action.............................................. ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Because its the law...............besides most of the guys dont want to marry they want to have 200-300 partners a year and be irresponsible. Its a power play sham nothing more.Cap'n Cat wrote:
I ask the reverse. If you wanted to marry a man, why should you be prevented from doing so because of some antiquated RELIGIOUS notions?
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Because its the law...............besides most of the guys dont want to marry they want to have 200-300 partners a year and be irresponsible. Its a power play sham nothing more.Cap'n Cat wrote:
I ask the reverse. If you wanted to marry a man, why should you be prevented from doing so because of some antiquated RELIGIOUS notions?
Cluck U wrote:mj is a dumbass whether he is gay or not but everyone on GoHens knew he was gay and anyone with half a brain on any other message board knew also.
Jeff's problem is that he hates himself and so he hates anyone like him.
Oh, he also hates everyone that is not like him. Seriously, has he ever had a solid conversation with anyone about any topic on any thread on any board?
Nope.
Say, Cap'n...you didn't notice Jiff checking out your junk in the trunk?
Cap'n Cat wrote:No, he's not Conk like that.Cluck U wrote:mj is a dumbass whether he is gay or not but everyone on GoHens knew he was gay and anyone with half a brain on any other message board knew also.
Jeff's problem is that he hates himself and so he hates anyone like him.
Oh, he also hates everyone that is not like him. Seriously, has he ever had a solid conversation with anyone about any topic on any thread on any board?
Nope.
Say, Cap'n...you didn't notice Jiff checking out your junk in the trunk?
Gizz.........we're not all like you.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Because its the law...............besides most of the guys dont want to marry they want to have 200-300 partners a year and be irresponsible. Its a power play sham nothing more.Cap'n Cat wrote:
I ask the reverse. If you wanted to marry a man, why should you be prevented from doing so because of some antiquated RELIGIOUS notions?
Maybe. I can smell the Petruli oil from here.Cap'n Cat wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Yeah right?
Some very surprising things being said by MJ in this thread.
There might be a foundation for a conservative conversion here.
STD,
One weekend in Wisconsin with me and D and this is you:
