*could89Hen wrote:Sorry for the slight.kalm wrote:
![]()
Just like on the mary jane thread where he nor kalm cold find anything incorrect in my posts over 7 years on the subject.
And thanks as always for the laughs!

*could89Hen wrote:Sorry for the slight.kalm wrote:
![]()
Just like on the mary jane thread where he nor kalm cold find anything incorrect in my posts over 7 years on the subject.

No problem. Sometimes the truth is funny I guess.kalm wrote:*could89Hen wrote: Sorry for the slight.
Just like on the mary jane thread where he nor kalm cold find anything incorrect in my posts over 7 years on the subject.
And thanks as always for the laughs!
![]()


These Jesus threads are like state SocialismIbanez wrote:We are so close......CID1990 wrote:I’m just here to see if we prove Jesus this time
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He isn't far off - 77% of that pie chart is lying.AZGrizFan wrote:Chizzang wrote: and 90% is a proper estimate
Ask damned near any American Christian a simple question from the Bible and they have no idea
congregational bible polls would be an embarrassment to the faith if anyone took them seriously
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is a "JSO-like" use of statistics there chizzy. 90% ain't even close to what you represented.

Uh huh. Tell us more!houndawg wrote:He isn't far off - 77% of that pie chart is lying.AZGrizFan wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is a "JSO-like" use of statistics there chizzy. 90% ain't even close to what you represented.


Baloney. I consider myself conventionally religious, but I’m solidly in the purple category. I tried reading the Bible front to back about 35 years ago, but I got bogged down around First Kings.houndawg wrote:He isn't far off - 77% of that pie chart is lying.AZGrizFan wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is a "JSO-like" use of statistics there chizzy. 90% ain't even close to what you represented.