Happy January 6th Trumpers

[Ibanez]

After watching how the Dems operated with Covington Catholic, Russia Collusion, etc, I'm holding out full judgement until I see the rest of the information that is being withheld.

That's a prudent course of action...although for some odd reason Trump, who says nothing bad happened and everything was beautiful, perfect and lovely, is fighting the release of information.

[SeattleGriz]

After watching how the Dems operated with Covington Catholic, Russia Collusion, etc, I'm holding out full judgement until I see the rest of the information that is being withheld.

That's a prudent course of action...although for some odd reason Trump, who says nothing bad happened and everything was beautiful, perfect and lovely, is fighting the release of information.

Doesn't change anything, but apparently so is Pelosi. They've requested documents from her and she's replied she wouldn't comply because the request is 'partisan'.

[houndawg]

Tell me you haven’t been following the latest news without telling me you haven’t been following the latest news.

Tell me you only watch network news without telling me you only watch network news.

The BBC has very good network news.

[BDKJMU]

You hold a special place in the hearts of this country, along with all the BLMers.

FIFY

[Ibanez]

That's a prudent course of action...although for some odd reason Trump, who says nothing bad happened and everything was beautiful, perfect and lovely, is fighting the release of information.

Doesn't change anything, but apparently so is Pelosi. They've requested documents from her and she's replied she wouldn't comply because the request is 'partisan'.

Oh I'm sure. Politicians will only release what they are legally supposed to (even then, they don't do that!)

In this day, and age anything requested by the other party will be "partisan." Tis' a shame.

[kalm]

Tell me you only watch network news without telling me you only watch network news.

The BBC has very good network news.

We’ve been watching that a little lately as background.

[SeattleGriz]

Doesn't change anything, but apparently so is Pelosi. They've requested documents from her and she's replied she wouldn't comply because the request is 'partisan'.

Oh I'm sure. Politicians will only release what they are legally supposed to (even then, they don't do that!)

In this day, and age anything requested by the other party will be "partisan." Tis' a shame.

Exactly, and if it was you or me, we'd be fucked. You see what the FBI pulled in Project Veritas?

[houndawg]

That's a prudent course of action...although for some odd reason Trump, who says nothing bad happened and everything was beautiful, perfect and lovely, is fighting the release of information.

Doesn't change anything, but apparently so is Pelosi. They've requested documents from her and she's replied she wouldn't comply because the request is 'partisan'.

Which documents?

[BDKJMU]

Commiela:

"Certain dates echo throughout history. Including dates that instantly remind all who have lived them where they were and what they were doing when our democracy came under assault. Dates that occupy not only a place on our calendar but a place in our collective memory. Dec. 7, 1941, Sept. 11, 2001, and Jan. 6, 2021."

Fooking more demented more than Brandon..

[SeattleGriz]

Doesn't change anything, but apparently so is Pelosi. They've requested documents from her and she's replied she wouldn't comply because the request is 'partisan'.

Which documents?

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022 ... er-role-s/

“The Sergeant at Arms, at the direction of the speaker has refused to provide us their communications surrounding Jan. 6. I believe those records will show there was a lot of communications and coordination between the speaker’s office and law enforcement officials leading up to and on Jan. 6,” Mr. Davis wrote in a statement Tuesday to The Washington Times.

He sent a letter Monday to Mrs. Pelosi that reiterated House Republicans’ demand for the release of documents and communications involving the decision not to deploy the National Guard for the mass protests anticipated that day.

[houndawg]

Which documents?

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022 ... er-role-s/

“The Sergeant at Arms, at the direction of the speaker has refused to provide us their communications surrounding Jan. 6. I believe those records will show there was a lot of communications and coordination between the speaker’s office and law enforcement officials leading up to and on Jan. 6,” Mr. Davis wrote in a statement Tuesday to The Washington Times.

He sent a letter Monday to Mrs. Pelosi that reiterated House Republicans’ demand for the release of documents and communications involving the decision not to deploy the National Guard for the mass protests anticipated that day.

What do you think they were talking about?

Besides sending help?

[Ibanez]

Which documents?

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022 ... er-role-s/

“The Sergeant at Arms, at the direction of the speaker has refused to provide us their communications surrounding Jan. 6. I believe those records will show there was a lot of communications and coordination between the speaker’s office and law enforcement officials leading up to and on Jan. 6,” Mr. Davis wrote in a statement Tuesday to The Washington Times.

He sent a letter Monday to Mrs. Pelosi that reiterated House Republicans’ demand for the release of documents and communications involving the decision not to deploy the National Guard for the mass protests anticipated that day.

Does that include the Sergeant at Arms for the US Senate who was equally responsible for not taking control of the riot?

[UNI88]

The BBC has very good network news.

We’ve been watching that a little lately as background.

Are you sure Houndie means the British Broadcasting Corporation? Maybe BBC has a different meaning for ol' Houndie.

[Winterborn]

Oh I'm sure. Politicians will only release what they are legally supposed to (even then, they don't do that!)

In this day, and age anything requested by the other party will be "partisan." Tis' a shame.

Exactly, and if it was you or me, we'd be fucked. You see what the FBI pulled in Project Veritas?

If the timeline winds up being true, we are getting pretty close to the Hoover days at the FBI.

[SeattleGriz]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022 ... er-role-s/

What do you think they were talking about?

Besides sending help?

This!



I assume the Capital Police deployment and what's was happening.

[SeattleGriz]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022 ... er-role-s/

Does that include the Sergeant at Arms for the US Senate who was equally responsible for not taking control of the riot?

Don't know. If political hay cannot be made, then I would say, "no".

[BDKJMU]

Runaway inflation
Botched handling of COVID variants
Runaway illegal immigration

But let's focus on one of hundreds of riots that happened in the past two years, and for which the catalysts have been/are being arrested and prosecuted.

Seems legit.

+Afghanistan debacle.
+skyrocketing violent crime..

[CAA Flagship]

Commiela:

"Certain dates echo throughout history. Including dates that instantly remind all who have lived them where they were and what they were doing when our democracy came under assault. Dates that occupy not only a place on our calendar but a place in our collective memory. Dec. 7, 1941, Sept. 11, 2001, and Jan. 6, 2021."

Fooking more demented more than Brandon..

Dammit. She omitted August 2, 1979.

[AZGrizFan]

Runaway inflation
Botched handling of COVID variants
Runaway illegal immigration

But let's focus on one of hundreds of riots that happened in the past two years, and for which the catalysts have been/are being arrested and prosecuted.

Seems legit.

+Afghanistan debacle.
+skyrocketing violent crime..

There’s a whole thread dedicated to his successes….

https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 434d7afd38

[Baldy]

Not a good day, but anyone who thinks Democracy was in any real danger on January 6th is either or an idiot or pandering, full stop.

Democracy could've ended without the rioters getting within a mile of the Capitol or it could've survived if everyone in the congressional chambers getting killed. Trump could've been removed from the WH like a police officer might remove an unruly drunk guy from a bar and rioters eventually can be dispersed with force. What matters is ultimately do the people with uniforms and guns (mainly the military) back the elected CiC or not.

Glenn Greenwald was right all along that Democrats and Never-Trumper Neocons are attempting to use this day like the GOP used 9/11.

Muh Democracy is under attack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Insurrection!!!!!!!!!!!!

[CID1990]

Tell me you only watch network news without telling me you only watch network news.

A little but Rolling Stone is still my main source.

What’s left when the only legit journalists bail and leave just the UVA Rapey Rapey ones behind?

Sounds like your kind o rag now more than before!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JohnStOnge]

After watching how the Dems operated with Covington Catholic, Russia Collusion, etc, I'm holding out full judgement until I see the rest of the information that is being withheld.

All other things aside (and again): The Mueller report did show cooperation between people in the Trump campaign and the Russians. The investigation was completely justified. You and many others have bought into a Republican spin on that issue. The Mueller report showed lots of misbehavior. We just had an Attorney General who jumped in front of the situation to spin it along with the problem of Republicans in Congress shielding Trump and his people from accountability.

The Russia investigation is NOT an example of Democrats saying something bad was going on when nothing was. Bad things were going on.

[AZGrizFan]

After watching how the Dems operated with Covington Catholic, Russia Collusion, etc, I'm holding out full judgement until I see the rest of the information that is being withheld.

All other things aside (and again): The Mueller report did show cooperation between people in the Trump campaign and the Russians. The investigation was completely justified. You and many others have bought into a Republican spin on that issue. The Mueller report showed lots of misbehavior. We just had an Attorney General who jumped in front of the situation to spin it along with the problem of Republicans in Congress shielding Trump and his people from accountability.

The Russia investigation is NOT an example of Democrats saying something bad was going on when nothing was. Bad things were going on.

You don’t say? Why haven’t you brought this up before?

[UNI88]

After watching how the Dems operated with Covington Catholic, Russia Collusion, etc, I'm holding out full judgement until I see the rest of the information that is being withheld.

All other things aside (and again): The Mueller report did show cooperation between people in the Trump campaign and the Russians. The investigation was completely justified. You and many others have bought into a Republican spin on that issue. The Mueller report showed lots of misbehavior. We just had an Attorney General who jumped in front of the situation to spin it along with the problem of Republicans in Congress shielding Trump and his people from accountability.

The Russia investigation is NOT an example of Democrats saying something bad was going on when nothing was. Bad things were going on.

Yes, there was 'misbehavior" but did the Mueller Report provide any proof that the 2016 election was stolen as Hillary and other Dems continue to claim?

There was "misbehavior" (supervisors kicking out observers but continuing to count ballots, mysterious flash drives being inserted into computers, etc.) during the 2020 elections as well.

The "misbehaviors" should be investigated and steps taken to prevent them in the future but a rational person doesn't believe they significantly impacted either election and doesn't believe either election was stolen.

To the Dem's credit they didn't go apeshit and storm the Capitol because of their crazy conspiracy theories but silencing 2020 conspiracists while perpetrating the 2016 conspiracy BS is hypocritical and dishonest.

[AZGrizFan]

All other things aside (and again): The Mueller report did show cooperation between people in the Trump campaign and the Russians. The investigation was completely justified. You and many others have bought into a Republican spin on that issue. The Mueller report showed lots of misbehavior. We just had an Attorney General who jumped in front of the situation to spin it along with the problem of Republicans in Congress shielding Trump and his people from accountability.

The Russia investigation is NOT an example of Democrats saying something bad was going on when nothing was. Bad things were going on.

Yes, there was 'misbehavior" but did the Mueller Report provide any proof that the 2016 election was stolen as Hillary and other Dems continue to claim?

There was "misbehavior" (supervisors kicking out observers but continuing to count ballots, mysterious flash drives being inserted into computers, etc.) during the 2020 elections as well.

The "misbehaviors" should be investigated and steps taken to prevent them in the future but a rational person doesn't believe they impacted either election and doesn't believe either election was stolen.

To the Dem's credit they didn't go apeshit and storm the Capitol because of their crazy conspiracy theories but silencing 2020 conspiracists while perpetrating the 2016 conspiracy BS is hypocritical and dishonest.

Lol. No, they didn’t go apeshit crazy and storm the capital. They just spent the next FOUR YEARS going apeshit crazy and destroying cities and lives all over the country. TDS is strong, and it lives on in the woke left.