Reagan understood this.Chizzang wrote:Large American Corporations cannot continue to be as profitable - if the immigration laws changeSDHornet wrote:Watching the resident conks spin on this entire topic is laughable. A few things come to mind:
1) the 14th amendment will never be removed so it's a waste of time even talking about that aspect of this issue. The funny thing is that the the 14th amendment isn't even an issue if...
2) the current rules on the books are enforced. Enforce the rules on the books and up the security/BP/wall/drones/etc on the border and illegal immigration becomes a trickle. This is what really should be the focus for the conk candidates. Now conks fucked themselves because instead of talking about way to reform immigration (i.e. win over Team Brown)...
3) Trump has highlighted the xenophobia (we all knew existed) of the conk base. Yeah this is the far right but still, in a crucial election that needed to win over a significant portion of Team Brown to have a shot of knocking off hildabeast (yes, she will be the donk nominee) Trump has alienated the fastest growing demographic (que voter fraud debate) in the US.
Good job conks.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
we dance around that point but it is HUGE
Low Pay workers are EXTREMELY VALUABLE
Team Brown works hard for less
Birthright citizenship
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69134
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Birthright citizenship
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38529
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Birthright citizenship
All sides want the laws to "change". Just about everyone agrees that the path to citizenship needs to be streamlined. Is that the "change" you are talking about?Chizzang wrote:
Large American Corporations cannot continue to be as profitable - if the immigration laws change
we dance around that point but it is HUGE
Low Pay workers are EXTREMELY VALUABLE
Team Brown works hard for less
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Birthright citizenship
I agree…which is why neither side has done anything to address the immigration issue…and neither side will. But I love seeing right wingers get excited when Trump says he’ll send everyone back and amend/repeal the 14th amendment…little do they know that nothing will change on immigration. Too many people (that matter) are fine with the status quo.Chizzang wrote:Large American Corporations cannot continue to be as profitable - if the immigration laws changeSDHornet wrote:Watching the resident conks spin on this entire topic is laughable. A few things come to mind:
1) the 14th amendment will never be removed so it's a waste of time even talking about that aspect of this issue. The funny thing is that the the 14th amendment isn't even an issue if...
2) the current rules on the books are enforced. Enforce the rules on the books and up the security/BP/wall/drones/etc on the border and illegal immigration becomes a trickle. This is what really should be the focus for the conk candidates. Now conks fucked themselves because instead of talking about way to reform immigration (i.e. win over Team Brown)...
3) Trump has highlighted the xenophobia (we all knew existed) of the conk base. Yeah this is the far right but still, in a crucial election that needed to win over a significant portion of Team Brown to have a shot of knocking off hildabeast (yes, she will be the donk nominee) Trump has alienated the fastest growing demographic (que voter fraud debate) in the US.
Good job conks.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
we dance around that point but it is HUGE
Low Pay workers are EXTREMELY VALUABLE
Team Brown works hard for less
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Birthright citizenship
Um, actually that would be addressed under the "immigration reform" part I mentioned in part 2.CID1990 wrote:Actually your #2 is a bit offSDHornet wrote:Watching the resident conks spin on this entire topic is laughable. A few things come to mind:
1) the 14th amendment will never be removed so it's a waste of time even talking about that aspect of this issue. The funny thing is that the the 14th amendment isn't even an issue if...
2) the current rules on the books are enforced. Enforce the rules on the books and up the security/BP/wall/drones/etc on the border and illegal immigration becomes a trickle. This is what really should be the focus for the conk candidates. Now conks **** themselves because instead of talking about way to reform immigration (i.e. win over Team Brown)...
3) Trump has highlighted the xenophobia (we all knew existed) of the conk base. Yeah this is the far right but still, in a crucial election that needed to win over a significant portion of Team Brown to have a shot of knocking off hildabeast (yes, she will be the donk nominee) Trump has alienated the fastest growing demographic (que voter fraud debate) in the US.
Good job conks.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(and I don't mean diarrhea)
There are no rules or laws to enforce concerning jus soli.
If you are applying for a tourist visa to the United States and you declare that you intend to have a baby there so that it will be a US citizen, you cannot be denied a visa on those grounds.
Birth tourism is huge around the world and we are seeing it firsthand in Nigeria. There are tens of thousands of dual citizens living in Nigeria, and as much as 3/4 of them are minor children whose non-citizen parents had them while legally in the US.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Birthright citizenship
Yup, this would be a good start.houndawg wrote: Yep. Illegal immigrants are about keeping wages down for Americans. Throw a few employers in jail and the problem vanishes overnight.
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Birthright citizenship
I'm mostly referencing the Republican candidate "tough talk" on immigrationCAA Flagship wrote:All sides want the laws to "change". Just about everyone agrees that the path to citizenship needs to be streamlined. Is that the "change" you are talking about?Chizzang wrote:
Large American Corporations cannot continue to be as profitable - if the immigration laws change
we dance around that point but it is HUGE
Low Pay workers are EXTREMELY VALUABLE
Team Brown works hard for less
Which is of course just talk - easily consumable bits for the angry right wing voter
But to find out where the rubber hits the road one need only ask a few simple questions
1) Who benefits from having low pay undocumented workers in the market place
2) What are the consequences of "fixing" this situation
3) Why has it gone "unfixed" for so many decades... if everybody is so upset about it
4) What are the forces at play (behind the scenes) that could keep something so simple for getting fixed
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect those dots
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38529
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Birthright citizenship
It sounds like you are only referencing part of the talk, and not the streamlining of the immigration process that many people are discussing.Chizzang wrote:I'm mostly referencing the Republican candidate "tough talk" on immigrationCAA Flagship wrote: All sides want the laws to "change". Just about everyone agrees that the path to citizenship needs to be streamlined. Is that the "change" you are talking about?
Which is of course just talk - easily consumable bits for the angry right wing voter
But to find out where the rubber hits the road one need only ask a few simple questions
1) Who benefits from having low pay undocumented workers in the market place
2) What are the consequences of "fixing" this situation
3) Why has it gone "unfixed" for so many decades... if everybody is so upset about it
4) What are the forces at play (behind the scenes) that could keep something so simple for getting fixed
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect those dots
Oh, and the answer to #3 is Obamacare.
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Birthright citizenship
Well sure...CAA Flagship wrote:It sounds like you are only referencing part of the talk, and not the streamlining of the immigration process that many people are discussing.Chizzang wrote: I'm mostly referencing the Republican candidate "tough talk" on immigration
Which is of course just talk - easily consumable bits for the angry right wing voter
But to find out where the rubber hits the road one need only ask a few simple questions
1) Who benefits from having low pay undocumented workers in the market place
2) What are the consequences of "fixing" this situation
3) Why has it gone "unfixed" for so many decades... if everybody is so upset about it
4) What are the forces at play (behind the scenes) that could keep something so simple for getting fixed
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect those dots
Oh, and the answer to #3 is Obamacare.
After a 30 year discussion we absolutely need to have another discussion
Let me guess - you work for the Federal Government
We can have this wrapped up in another 30 years (if we have enough discussions)
in the meanwhile - if nothing changes - that's good for business
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- JohnStOnge
- Egalitarian

- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
- I am a fan of: McNeese State
- A.K.A.: JohnStOnge
Re: Birthright citizenship
Bottom line is that blanket "birthright citizenship" is a bad idea. It's probably true that it can't be changed. But it's a bad idea.
And there's nothing wrong with at least TRYING to get rid of it. One thing's for sure: If you don't TRY to change something that is a bad idea you're CERTAINLY not going to change it.
And there's nothing wrong with at least TRYING to get rid of it. One thing's for sure: If you don't TRY to change something that is a bad idea you're CERTAINLY not going to change it.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19046
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Birthright citizenship
Yeah dammit. He means ALL amendments...except the 2nd!Chizzang wrote:JEEZUS TITTY FUCKING CHRIST... For the THOUSANDTH TIME
I am 100% in support of the 2nd amendment
I am in no way making inferences to the 2nd amendment
I am referring to ALL amendments and all the issues that confront America today
I'm asking how it is we can so selectively "open our minds" in one way and not another...
Why would anybody who is Religious or Conservative begin a debate
arguing from the point of "Opening your mind"
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38529
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Birthright citizenship
Wait. Are you SURE he said ALL?SeattleGriz wrote:Yeah dammit. He means ALL amendments...except the 2nd!Chizzang wrote:JEEZUS TITTY FUCKING CHRIST... For the THOUSANDTH TIME
I am 100% in support of the 2nd amendment
I am in no way making inferences to the 2nd amendment
I am referring to ALL amendments and all the issues that confront America today
I'm asking how it is we can so selectively "open our minds" in one way and not another...
Why would anybody who is Religious or Conservative begin a debate
arguing from the point of "Opening your mind"
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Birthright citizenship
Like the 2nd?Chizzang wrote:So...Pwns wrote:I'm not a hardline anti-immigration guy, but I still want to know if anyone here has a good reason for why we should still have it? It's a very different world today than it was when the 14th amendment was put in place.
The only other country in the world that has it only has the US and vast tundras for neighbors. Even those enlightened, diversensitolerant European countries don't have it.
Discuss.
You're going to use the old "Its a different world today" tactic
Fascinating - I don;t disagree - it is indeed a different world
But doesnt that same "open minded approach" you just launched this thread with
apply to a whole bunch of amendments and philosophical issues..?
Curious
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Birthright citizenship
Pwns wrote:I'm not a hardline anti-immigration guy, but I still want to know if anyone here has a good reason for why we should still have it? It's a very different world today than it was when the 14th amendment was put in place.
The only other country in the world that has it only has the US and vast tundras for neighbors. Even those enlightened, diversensitolerant European countries don't have it.
Discuss.
Most of the Western Hemisphere has birthright citizenship
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Birthright citizenship
Sort of like "stick it to the big banks and wall street" or income inequality is to the left's pitchfork and torch wieldersChizzang wrote:I'm mostly referencing the Republican candidate "tough talk" on immigrationCAA Flagship wrote: All sides want the laws to "change". Just about everyone agrees that the path to citizenship needs to be streamlined. Is that the "change" you are talking about?
Which is of course just talk - easily consumable bits for the angry right wing voter
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69134
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Birthright citizenship
CID1990 wrote:Sort of like "stick it to the big banks and wall street" or income inequality is to the left's pitchfork and torch wieldersChizzang wrote: I'm mostly referencing the Republican candidate "tough talk" on immigration
Which is of course just talk - easily consumable bits for the angry right wing voter
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36364
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Birthright citizenship
"The Very Real Economic Costs of Birthright Citizenship
....According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.”....
....According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes....."
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... incentives" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

....According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.”....
....According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes....."
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... incentives" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Birthright citizenship
even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes....."
I call BS on that
I call BS on that
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36364
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Birthright citizenship
Most don't pay income taxes..dbackjon wrote:even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes....."
I call BS on that
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Birthright citizenship
BDKJMU wrote:Most don't pay income taxes..dbackjon wrote:even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes....."
I call BS on that
Source?
Or more made-up bullshit that the right believes because it fits their narrative?
Your article was long on rhetoric, short on numbers, which is strange for an article that purports to be about the very real economic costs
- JohnStOnge
- Egalitarian

- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
- I am a fan of: McNeese State
- A.K.A.: JohnStOnge
Re: Birthright citizenship
You don't have to remove the 14th Amendment. You just have to remove one provision of it.1) the 14th amendment will never be removed so it's a waste of time even talking about that aspect of this issue.
I honestly think that if you could just isolate it to that one provision there might be SOME chance of doing it. Just the single provision that being born in the United States regardless of other circumstances means you're a citizen.
Like I think there's a good chance that if you ask people if a child born to someone in the United States illegally should be a citizen a solid majority might say "no." I think you might indeed have a chance of developing sentiment to Amend the Constitution so that doesn't happen.
And really, it's pretty obviously a bad idea to say that a child born to someone who is not here legally is automatically a citizen.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36364
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Birthright citizenship
47% of Americans don't pay income taxes. If you think a majority of illegals do then you're a lot dumber than I thought you were..dbackjon wrote:Source?BDKJMU wrote:
Most don't pay income taxes..
Or more made-up bullshit that the right believes because it fits their narrative?
Your article was long on rhetoric, short on numbers, which is strange for an article that purports to be about the very real economic costs
And the article cited a number of stats. I can't help it if they didn't teach you reading comprehension at NAU..
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Birthright citizenship
he is actually correctdbackjon wrote:BDKJMU wrote:
Most don't pay income taxes..
Source?
Or more made-up bullshit that the right believes because it fits their narrative?
Your article was long on rhetoric, short on numbers, which is strange for an article that purports to be about the very real economic costs
illegals pay little to nothing in taxes
when they become legal and petition for their families, i see the tax returns- ive seen them in se asia, central america, and now africa
the song remains the same- the vast majority of them do not earn more than 125% of the median poverty level and need joint sponsors to petition
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Birthright citizenship
They sound like valuable Wal-Mart employees then..!!!CID1990 wrote:he is actually correctdbackjon wrote:
Source?
Or more made-up bullshit that the right believes because it fits their narrative?
Your article was long on rhetoric, short on numbers, which is strange for an article that purports to be about the very real economic costs
illegals pay little to nothing in taxes
when they become legal and petition for their families, i see the tax returns- ive seen them in se asia, central america, and now africa
the song remains the same- the vast majority of them do not earn more than 125% of the median poverty level and need joint sponsors to petition
who else will work for those wages and make profits go up and make stock value go up
We CANNOT over pay for labor - says Wall Street (our master)
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Birthright citizenship
oh okChizzang wrote:They sound like valuable Wal-Mart employees then..!!!CID1990 wrote:
he is actually correct
illegals pay little to nothing in taxes
when they become legal and petition for their families, i see the tax returns- ive seen them in se asia, central america, and now africa
the song remains the same- the vast majority of them do not earn more than 125% of the median poverty level and need joint sponsors to petition
who else will work for those wages and make profits go up and make stock value go up
We CANNOT over pay for labor - says Wall Street (our master)
so walmart should hire illegals?
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Birthright citizenship
Should..?CID1990 wrote:oh okChizzang wrote:
They sound like valuable Wal-Mart employees then..!!!
who else will work for those wages and make profits go up and make stock value go up
We CANNOT over pay for labor - says Wall Street (our master)
so walmart should hire illegals?
How about DOES (already convicted) with a few more pending situations
They plea bargained out of their Federal Case using the creative tool / MONEY
$11 Million not including side bribes and political pocket money
They must be off the hook - clean as a whistle
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus


