Agreed. 2 years of compulsory service, then free college.houndawg wrote:Not only is it a good idea, something similar should be mandatory for a year right after high school.CID1990 wrote:
Welfare camps
I'm serious
If you want food, go to the chow hall. Shoes? Go to the clothing warehouse. Report for work at 0730.
And before anybody calls me some kind of fascist I am simply suggesting a new CCC. Libs love themselves some New Deal so here you go.
Degree by 24, debt free.
AZGrizFan wrote:Agreed. 2 years of compulsory service, then free college.houndawg wrote:
Not only is it a good idea, something similar should be mandatory for a year right after high school.
I'm an honorary member (I have a lifetime homo socialist certificate)CID1990 wrote:You better not let the boys down at your homo coffee shop hear you saying thatChizzang wrote:The laws of Social and Political Entropy in action... only with an unlimited supply source
(our citizenry's personal finances)
Ever expanding and becoming more random, larger and less organized - creeping into every aspect filling every corner - and instead of dissipating naturally into nothingness it is continually supplied and re-invigorated so as to never stop it's gradual suffocating expansion...
That ^ is what we have today gentlemen
(I just wrote that up off the top of my pointy head, if you'd like more enigmatic hyperbole stay tuned)
they'll pull your honorary homo socialist card
I am happy that you are in a very small minority.JohnStOnge wrote:Well, he's certainly not talking about me as I certainly AM in favor of eliminating all social welfare programs. If I had my way there would be no programs designed to ensure some minimum level of well being for individuals.
But I'll say that I do realize that there are plenty of people who claim they are for minimal government yet won't go there. Like the Tea Party. I've seen polls on what people in the Tea Party movement would do and not do. Like for instance they would not eliminate the Social Security system.
Don't tell me you're really for going back to original Constitutional principles if you're not in favor of eliminating the Social Security system because you're not.
The flip side of the argument.No, you can't. Occupy Wall Streeters are by definition histrionic wackjobs.And you can be a liberal while being a rational, level headed Occupy Wall Streeter.
What does this mean for the liberal red herring argument that conservative/libertarian nirvana is Somalia?kalm wrote:So everybody pretty much agrees we need a social safety net with greater efficiency!
You do realize that's satire right?UNI88 wrote:What does this mean for the liberal red herring argument that conservative/libertarian nirvana is Somalia?kalm wrote:So everybody pretty much agrees we need a social safety net with greater efficiency!
Oh, imagine the possibilities.AZGrizFan wrote:Imagine how many truly needy people could have been helped with their healthcare (without blowing up the system) if there wasn't so much waste in the other "safety net" programs.
