∞∞∞ wrote:I didn't wanna start a new thread, but I was just reading about Ancient Athens and how their tax system worked. Like the US, they had a progressive tax, but unlike the US, they didn't feel like being taxed more was annoying or wrong. In fact, it was really prestigous to them because they thought of it as doing good for the city, and it also provided them a bit of glory and recognition.
For example, the upper class would pay 50% tax, but in return, they get public buildings, bridges, fountains, parks, venues and etc. named after them. And then I thought to myself if something as crazy as this would actually work in the US to cut our deficit. Have the upper class pay way more, but in return recognize them in various ways such as naming all the public works projects after them, having concerts/dinners in their honor, and etc. Maybe if we develop that "prestige" mindset Athenians had for helping their city, this plan is wacky enough to work for the US.
And I'm not just talking super rich famous people. Our average upper class citizens would be included in this too.
Some poli out here recently suggested that...it died overnight. Being realistic (pragmatic), the majority of old-rich are no fools and can smell a boondoggle before it arrives. Unless it benefits them financially, they'll pass. Hell, look at Buffet's "estate giveaway" program that so many uber-wealthy have joined. When you look at the details...they all gain a tax advantage in some form...it's not strictly altruistic charity.
One of the keys to amassing wealth is the art of concealment. The world is full of predators sniffing out wealth.
Once ego supercedes prudence, wealth dissipates rapidly.