Skjellyfetti wrote:Eh. Last Spring you were yawning at this story saying that if there were going to be indictments - they would have already been charged. Now you're saying we knew folks like Manafort and Gates were going to be charged all along. Ok. You certainly didn't make your thoughts on that known.
I never claimed Trump would be indicted. In fact - I've said repeatedly that it is unlikely. I also don't think it's likely that anyone still in the White House. Very few remain - and, the few that do remain have only tangentially been related to any of these stories.(like Kellyanne Conway) or not at all (like Stephen Miller). Kushner is an exception - but, we'll see how much longer he's in the WH.
Stop it, you're so deep into this you're just making stuff up now. A year ago, I said Flynn was guilty as sin and was going down. Here's my post from March 31st of last year (i.e. last spring):
Gannonfan wrote:Don't know yet. Flynn's obviously guilty of stuff stretching back several years, but is that news that a political operative took money he shouldn't have? He's probably in a lot of company on both sides of the aisle in Washington. As to what else, eh, we'll see. The Russians releasing stolen information that Clinton was corrupt is hardly a revelation, she's been corrupt for years. It's why the Dems shouldn't have rigged their primary in the first place to guarantee she was the nominee. If it's just guys like Flynn who go down in this then it's not going to really resonate. Get someone with a Trump last name and it's a different game.
People were always going to charged - just as Flynn had existing stuff to charge him on obviously Manafort was the same. You got anything else?
