Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion,
I can see this thread has veered off course but that's what usually happens. I'll go with it.
I've seen the thing where the "NO" in that clause is emphasized before. But what about the rest of it?
How about "CONGRESS?" How about "MAKE?" How about "LAW?"
You know, to violate that clause, the CONGRESS must make a LAW with respect to establishment of religion. Even if you take the questionable interpretation holding that the 14th Amendment extended that to the States, it still takes a legislative body making a LAW with respect to the establishment of religion.
It says nothing at all about association between Church and State. It clearly does not, for example, prohibit a school from having an informal practice of reading prayers over the intercom. It clearly does not prohibit something like a nativity scene in a public park.
If you're going to read the language read the language.
And BTW the CONGRESS appropriated funds to hire a chaplain and began holding Christian Church services in the House chamber shortly after the Bill of Rights was ratified. That ought to end any illusions you have about how the people of the time construed that language. Or rather how they did not. It's clear that what they were thinking bears no resembllance to the "interpretations" (i.e., distortions) of the First Amendment establishment clause inflicted upon us by the Supreme Court in relatively recent years.