Milltown State Park is looking good these days. Thank goodness the EPA is around to clean up after thoughtless conk miners.kalm wrote:I'm gonna be down by the Spokane River tomorrow where a once almost sterile waterway is once again host to native red band rainbow trout, kayakers, and rafters.
Thanks, EPA!
i thought he personally went in and pressed "delete" 22 million times over the replacement of us attorneysdbackjon wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
Crashed hard drives, lost tapes, same-same.
Bush deleted 22 million emails regarding the outing of Valerie Plame, Conks thought that was just normal business...
They dig conks up out of the ground?Grizalltheway wrote:Milltown State Park is looking good these days. Thank goodness the EPA is around to clean up after thoughtless conk miners.kalm wrote:I'm gonna be down by the Spokane River tomorrow where a once almost sterile waterway is once again host to native red band rainbow trout, kayakers, and rafters.
Thanks, EPA!
The time line doesn't work out, he would have been too busy setting charges in the towers.CID1990 wrote:i thought he personally went in and pressed "delete" 22 million times over the replacement of us attorneysdbackjon wrote:
Bush deleted 22 million emails regarding the outing of Valerie Plame, Conks thought that was just normal business...
keep trying to make this about Bush ir whatever- somebody at IRS (probably more than one person) needs to do 5-10 in federal prison. most people could care less whether this reaches the WH or not
but by all means keep throwing out canards that have no equivalence anyway
So they want to teach science....in schools!!!!travelinman67 wrote:EPA Liar In Chief McCarthy : We need to get 'em when they're young...
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-enviro ... -in-school
...Hey, Teacher! Leave those kids alone!
The EPA "climate change" propaganda is not science. Disproven for the past 17 years. Repeatedly found to have falsified data. Overtly attempts to destroy anyone who challenges their narrative.kalm wrote:So they want to teach science....in schools!!!!travelinman67 wrote:EPA Liar In Chief McCarthy : We need to get 'em when they're young...
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-enviro ... -in-school
...Hey, Teacher! Leave those kids alone!
Yeah, just like Benghazi. You fucking whack job.travelinman67 wrote:The EPA "climate change" propaganda is not science. Disproven for the past 17 years. Repeatedly found to have falsified data. Overtly attempts to destroy anyone who challenges their narrative.kalm wrote:
So they want to teach science....in schools!!!!
AccuracyD1B wrote:I've become CS's irrelevant troll.travelinman67 wrote:
The EPA "climate change" propaganda is not science. Disproven for the past 17 years. Repeatedly found to have falsified data. Overtly attempts to destroy anyone who challenges their narrative.
EPA DROPS APPEAL OF STORMWATER RUNOFF RULING
Date: September 26, 2014
West Virginia Is Focus Of Debate Over Clean Water Act
Last Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency decided to drop its appeal of an October 2013 Federal court ruling in favor a West Virginia farmer. EPA unsuccessfully tried to make the case that it has the power to regulate stormwater runoff from livestock or poultry farms, claiming the Clean Water Act allows it to make rules regarding “concentrated animal feeding operations.” The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia ruled otherwise. Following last week’s announcement, American Farm Bureau President Bob Stallman said, “EPA knows its effort to regulate perfectly well-run farms cannot withstand legal scrutiny, and the agency doesn’t quite know how to deal with that.”Earlier this month the House of Representatives passed legislation that explicitly prohibits the EPA from further expanding its authority under the Clean Water Act to cover anything but lakes, rivers and streams. That bill was sponsored by Rep. Steve Southerland of Florida.
Why This Matters For Small Business.
While the ruling the EPA had been appealing dealt with farms, had the agency been victorious, there is little doubt that other types of small businesses would have come under the regulatory microscope regarding their treatment of storm water. And the American Farm Bureau is warning that the EPA will continue its attempts to broaden the scope of its oversight even after being dealt a defeat in the courts.
Further Reading.
In an op-ed for The Hill, Sen. David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, who has joined with Sen. Joe Manchin, Democrat of West Virginia, to introduce the Regulatory Fairness Act of 2014, says there is bipartisan support for prohibiting the EPA “from preemptively or retroactively vetoing Clean Water Act permits without just cause.”The American Farm Bureau drew attention to the EPA’s decision not pursue its case against the West Virginia farmer with fines as high as $37,000 a day, and theCharleston (WV) Daily Mail covered the House passage of the bill aimed at limiting the EPA’s power to regulate American farmers...
Thanks to the EPA our rivers don't catch fire anymore.Cap'n Cat wrote:EPA, created by a Conk. A glorious institution.
One of my favorite trout streams has a 500 head feed lot on it right above a stretch of great looking trout habitat, but the stream is empty through that stretch thanks to the cow shit.travelinman67 wrote:EPA drops appeal of farm runoff decision...
http://www.nfib.com/article/bnews-epa-d ... ing-66617/
EPA DROPS APPEAL OF STORMWATER RUNOFF RULING
Date: September 26, 2014
West Virginia Is Focus Of Debate Over Clean Water Act
Last Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency decided to drop its appeal of an October 2013 Federal court ruling in favor a West Virginia farmer. EPA unsuccessfully tried to make the case that it has the power to regulate stormwater runoff from livestock or poultry farms, claiming the Clean Water Act allows it to make rules regarding “concentrated animal feeding operations.” The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia ruled otherwise. Following last week’s announcement, American Farm Bureau President Bob Stallman said, “EPA knows its effort to regulate perfectly well-run farms cannot withstand legal scrutiny, and the agency doesn’t quite know how to deal with that.”Earlier this month the House of Representatives passed legislation that explicitly prohibits the EPA from further expanding its authority under the Clean Water Act to cover anything but lakes, rivers and streams. That bill was sponsored by Rep. Steve Southerland of Florida.
Why This Matters For Small Business.
While the ruling the EPA had been appealing dealt with farms, had the agency been victorious, there is little doubt that other types of small businesses would have come under the regulatory microscope regarding their treatment of storm water. And the American Farm Bureau is warning that the EPA will continue its attempts to broaden the scope of its oversight even after being dealt a defeat in the courts.
Further Reading.
In an op-ed for The Hill, Sen. David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, who has joined with Sen. Joe Manchin, Democrat of West Virginia, to introduce the Regulatory Fairness Act of 2014, says there is bipartisan support for prohibiting the EPA “from preemptively or retroactively vetoing Clean Water Act permits without just cause.”The American Farm Bureau drew attention to the EPA’s decision not pursue its case against the West Virginia farmer with fines as high as $37,000 a day, and theCharleston (WV) Daily Mail covered the House passage of the bill aimed at limiting the EPA’s power to regulate American farmers...
And the Eel River is dry due to illegal pot growers stealing water.kalm wrote:One of my favorite trout streams has a 500 head feed lot on it right above a stretch of great looking trout habitat, but the stream is empty through that stretch thanks to the cow shit.travelinman67 wrote:EPA drops appeal of farm runoff decision...
http://www.nfib.com/article/bnews-epa-d ... ing-66617/
travelinman67 wrote:And the Eel River is dry due to illegal pot growers stealing water.kalm wrote:
One of my favorite trout streams has a 500 head feed lot on it right above a stretch of great looking trout habitat, but the stream is empty through that stretch thanks to the cow shit.
Neither justifies the EPA asserting blanket regulatory control over an entire class of industry without just cause.
Adds nothing.Cap'n Cat wrote:travelinman67 wrote:
And the Eel River is dry due to illegal pot growers stealing water.
Neither justifies the EPA asserting blanket regulatory control over an entire class of industry without just cause.
Bitter, old, fat, failed, washed up dumbfuck Conk message board gadfly crank.
Becoming a cartoon of your portly self here, Tflesh.
Even if that were true...travelinman67 wrote:And the Eel River is dry due to illegal pot growers stealing water.kalm wrote:
One of my favorite trout streams has a 500 head feed lot on it right above a stretch of great looking trout habitat, but the stream is empty through that stretch thanks to the cow shit.
Neither justifies the EPA asserting blanket regulatory control over an entire class of industry without just cause.
