Why not? If you own a couple rental units that you depend on to help keep a roof over your head, help feed your family, help pay for your kids college, help fund your retirement, etc, if a tenant isn't paying, you should be able to say get the f out via eviction, so you can rent it out to people who will pay.GannonFan wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 2:23 pmThis was an area which I'm not sure if it was addressed, but it should've been, like the Paycheck Protection Program. If the government is going to interceded into a private, legal arrangement and in essence stop it, then government needs to compensate, to an extent, for the loss of business, or in this case rent. They'll never be made fully whole, and likely shouldn't, but there should be some recognition that the government basically seized profits from someone. It was for the greater good, but the greater good shouldn't necessarily crush someone in the process.
Coronavirus COVID-19
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28195
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
You're acting like these landlords would turn down a gubmint bailout if offered. They took this risk, they can tough out the consequences.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 12:52 pmTrue, but the govt shouldn’t be able to dictate that tentants can live rent free for up to a year+, with landlords not being able to evictSDHornet wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 11:40 am
How long would it take to save up for your first rental property after you pay off your primary house?
If people want to take the risk of going in debt for a rental property, more power to them. Just don't bitch about losing out when the economy hits the skids and you're stuck having to cover additional mortgages.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Maybe the should have thought this through a little more. They take on these risks, then bare the responsibility. Zero sympathy here for these landlords that over-leveraged themselves with a risky investment. Zero.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 4:08 pmWhy not? If you own a couple rental units that you depend on to help keep a roof over your head, help feed your family, help pay for your kids college, help fund your retirement, etc, if a tenant isn't paying, you should be able to say get the f out via eviction, so you can rent it out to people who will pay.GannonFan wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 2:23 pm
This was an area which I'm not sure if it was addressed, but it should've been, like the Paycheck Protection Program. If the government is going to interceded into a private, legal arrangement and in essence stop it, then government needs to compensate, to an extent, for the loss of business, or in this case rent. They'll never be made fully whole, and likely shouldn't, but there should be some recognition that the government basically seized profits from someone. It was for the greater good, but the greater good shouldn't necessarily crush someone in the process.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 20353
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Doesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?SDHornet wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 8:46 pmMaybe the should have thought this through a little more. They take on these risks, then bare the responsibility. Zero sympathy here for these landlords that over-leveraged themselves with a risky investment. Zero.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 4:08 pm
Why not? If you own a couple rental units that you depend on to help keep a roof over your head, help feed your family, help pay for your kids college, help fund your retirement, etc, if a tenant isn't paying, you should be able to say get the f out via eviction, so you can rent it out to people who will pay.
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30953
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Like the Obama/Bush bailout of banks, while letting the America home owners lose their houses?UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 10:13 pmDoesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
If you own a couple of rental units you’re part of the problem, not the solution. Just ask Trip. He’s got it all figured out.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 4:08 pmWhy not? If you own a couple rental units that you depend on to help keep a roof over your head, help feed your family, help pay for your kids college, help fund your retirement, etc, if a tenant isn't paying, you should be able to say get the f out via eviction, so you can rent it out to people who will pay.GannonFan wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 2:23 pm
This was an area which I'm not sure if it was addressed, but it should've been, like the Paycheck Protection Program. If the government is going to interceded into a private, legal arrangement and in essence stop it, then government needs to compensate, to an extent, for the loss of business, or in this case rent. They'll never be made fully whole, and likely shouldn't, but there should be some recognition that the government basically seized profits from someone. It was for the greater good, but the greater good shouldn't necessarily crush someone in the process.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Did anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).SDHornet wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 8:46 pmMaybe the should have thought this through a little more. They take on these risks, then bare the responsibility. Zero sympathy here for these landlords that over-leveraged themselves with a risky investment. Zero.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 4:08 pm
Why not? If you own a couple rental units that you depend on to help keep a roof over your head, help feed your family, help pay for your kids college, help fund your retirement, etc, if a tenant isn't paying, you should be able to say get the f out via eviction, so you can rent it out to people who will pay.
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30953
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Government helped the banks and the auto industry in the past, why not the landlords? Follow the money.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 amDid anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59651
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
The trashing of apartments can be mitigated through insurance and/or cost of doing business, but you make a good point. I wonder what percentage of rental property owners rely upon that as their sole source of income? I think you can make a case for bail outs everywhere but shouldn’t over heads precede investment income?UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 10:13 pmDoesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 20353
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Trashed apartments is just another headache during a very stressful time. It's anecdotal but I've talked to 2 landlords who rely primarily on rental income in the last year. I'm sure there are more of them than most people realize.kalm wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:06 amThe trashing of apartments can be mitigated through insurance and/or cost of doing business, but you make a good point. I wonder what percentage of rental property owners rely upon that as their sole source of income? I think you can make a case for bail outs everywhere but shouldn’t over heads precede investment income?UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 10:13 pm
Doesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
From what I've heard (anecdotal again) landlords are offering to assist tenants with filling out and submitting assistance paperwork but many tenants who aren't paying rent also aren't putting in the effort to get assistance. There is also less assistance available to tenants who moved to less expensive apartments to pay back rent at their old apartments.
Just more examples of legislative bodies and governmental agencies rushing to solve a problem without putting enough effort into considering potential unintended consequences.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59651
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:24 amTrashed apartments is just another headache during a very stressful time. It's anecdotal but I've talked to 2 landlords who rely primarily on rental income in the last year. I'm sure there are more of them than most people realize.kalm wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:06 am
The trashing of apartments can be mitigated through insurance and/or cost of doing business, but you make a good point. I wonder what percentage of rental property owners rely upon that as their sole source of income? I think you can make a case for bail outs everywhere but shouldn’t over heads precede investment income?
From what I've heard (anecdotal again) landlords are offering to assist tenants with filling out and submitting assistance paperwork but many tenants who aren't paying rent also aren't putting in the effort to get assistance. There is also less assistance available to tenants who moved to less expensive apartments to pay back rent at their old apartments.
Just more examples of legislative bodies and governmental agencies rushing to solve a problem without putting enough effort into considering potential unintended consequences.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28195
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
How about the govt not declaring that people can't be evicted for failing to pay rent for a year+, then there's no necessity to help out landlords.Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 6:46 amGovernment helped the banks and the auto industry in the past, why not the landlords? Follow the money.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 am
Did anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Yes. Yes it does.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 10:13 pmDoesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
And we've come full circle.Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:19 amLike the Obama/Bush bailout of banks, while letting the America home owners lose their houses?UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 10:13 pm
Doesn't that logic also apply to restaurant owners? Couldn't it also apply to market investors if the government gets even more involved in picking winners and losers?
The eviction moratorium forced landlords to keep tenants who weren't paying their rent, some of whom were trashing their places when they eventually did move. It kept them from cutting their losses and moving on.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
You get what you vote for.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 amDid anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59651
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
SD...killing it here.SDHornet wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 9:09 amYou get what you vote for.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 am
Did anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Well I agree with that, but nice deflection.SDHornet wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 9:09 amYou get what you vote for.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:30 am
Did anyone seriously think it was a “risk” that the government was going to step in and basically allow people to stop paying their rent and live for free for 12-18 months? Rental properties aren’t that complicated. You pay X, you rent it for Y, and hopefully the rent covers the mortgage and expenses and you have a little left over to put in the bank. It can take YEARS to get to a point where the property is paid off/down to the point where the income is substantial. And while There’s an “X” on the property, the bank is at risk as well (I know, I know, who GAF about big bad banks, right?).
And how about this concept: If the government bears no risk (which it most certainly does not), why does it get to tax the reward?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 16557
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
No. No. No. New study by IHME on total deaths.
http://www.healthdata.org/special-analy ... -19-deathsFigure 6 shows the adjusted daily deaths for the world once reported deaths are multiplied by these estimated ratios for each location and week. Our analysis estimates that by May 3, 2021, the total number of COVID-19 deaths was 6.93 million
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30953
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Flu deaths are also estimated. This puts the US death estimate to over 900,000.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 5:11 pm No. No. No. New study by IHME on total deaths.
http://www.healthdata.org/special-analy ... -19-deathsFigure 6 shows the adjusted daily deaths for the world once reported deaths are multiplied by these estimated ratios for each location and week. Our analysis estimates that by May 3, 2021, the total number of COVID-19 deaths was 6.93 million
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59651
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Wow. That’s a lot of deaths but freedom ain’t freeSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 5:11 pm No. No. No. New study by IHME on total deaths.
http://www.healthdata.org/special-analy ... -19-deathsFigure 6 shows the adjusted daily deaths for the world once reported deaths are multiplied by these estimated ratios for each location and week. Our analysis estimates that by May 3, 2021, the total number of COVID-19 deaths was 6.93 million
Fucking Fauci!
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 30953
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Interesting map.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter
- Posts: 16557
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
You can tell Fauci had a hand in it. 6.93 is a made up number only used properly by those on this board. Fucking Fauci.kalm wrote: ↑Sat May 08, 2021 5:20 amWow. That’s a lot of deaths but freedom ain’t freeSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 5:11 pm No. No. No. New study by IHME on total deaths.
http://www.healthdata.org/special-analy ... -19-deaths
Fucking Fauci!
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 20353
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
And you know that how?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59651
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19
Red state latent homosexuality via polling.