Is UND hot? I will fuck it!!SeattleGriz wrote:You fucked UND. Someone did! Isn't that our go to phrase this year?93henfan wrote:
UND? The team that lost to Idaho State?![]()
Again, arguing over teams that weak... who cares really? None will make the quarters.
New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
I completely agree ^ with this...93henfan wrote:UNH blows. I don't think anybody disputed that, did they? I mean, they were smoked by Stony Brook and Delaware.
All this really showed is how watered down FCS is and how the field is way too large.
16 is where it should still be. Arguing over the 22nd, 23rd, 24th teams in FCS is silly. None of those teams belong in a playoff anyway.
When you're asking yourself "Which one of these mediocre teams sucks the least"
You've got too many teams
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 66941
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
Sure! If you like LESS football.Chizzang wrote:I completely agree ^ with this...93henfan wrote:UNH blows. I don't think anybody disputed that, did they? I mean, they were smoked by Stony Brook and Delaware.
All this really showed is how watered down FCS is and how the field is way too large.
16 is where it should still be. Arguing over the 22nd, 23rd, 24th teams in FCS is silly. None of those teams belong in a playoff anyway.
When you're asking yourself "Which one of these mediocre teams sucks the least"
You've got too many teams
Why I was just sitting here today thinking "if I only had less football to watch".
Maybe if we didn't water down the field, the product would be better and they'd take us more seriously!
The more the merrier. The more inter-conference match ups the better.
A chance for upsets? Better.
The greater chance my team gets in for at least one more game and possibly a home game?
Better.
The watered down/too many teams sentiment is for stick-in-the-muds.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
93henfan wrote:All this really showed is how watered down FCS is and how the field is way too large.

- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
The let everyone in sentiment is for people who like participation medals.kalm wrote:The watered down/too many teams sentiment is for stick-in-the-muds.

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
24 out of 120-some teams is "everyone"?89Hen wrote:The let everyone in sentiment is for people who like participation medals.kalm wrote:The watered down/too many teams sentiment is for stick-in-the-muds.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
When you're searching for mediocre teams, yes.Grizalltheway wrote:24 out of 120-some teams is "everyone"?89Hen wrote: The let everyone in sentiment is for people who like participation medals.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 66941
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
The too many teams sentiment is for every other year (or 5 straight) under .500 CAA clubs.89Hen wrote:The let everyone in sentiment is for people who like participation medals.kalm wrote:The watered down/too many teams sentiment is for stick-in-the-muds.
'Whoa! Those tits are just way too big and that's WAY too much football!'
'
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
New Hampshire stunk. North Dakota stunk. Western Illinois stunk.
None of them belongs in a serious playoff discussion.
JMU is simply a Big Sky team in CAA clothing. Ditto Richmond.
W&M has an idiot coach who doesn't make defensive adjustments.
JState has a team this year
...but we'll see if they have learned how to win.
The South Carolina teams all have had glaring weaknesses. McNeese doesn't have an offense capable of winning it all. SHSU can score with anyone if it isn't raining (pssst...espandos...the chemtrails are actually laced with J. Johnson kryptonite), but their DC (the original one who is still calling things..we'll see how long he lasts) doesn't know how to use the talent he has.
We're really stuck with UNI, Ill St., and JState...with NDSU and SHSU as dark horses.
The rest of the teams don't have a chance.
None of them belongs in a serious playoff discussion.
JMU is simply a Big Sky team in CAA clothing. Ditto Richmond.
W&M has an idiot coach who doesn't make defensive adjustments.
JState has a team this year
The South Carolina teams all have had glaring weaknesses. McNeese doesn't have an offense capable of winning it all. SHSU can score with anyone if it isn't raining (pssst...espandos...the chemtrails are actually laced with J. Johnson kryptonite), but their DC (the original one who is still calling things..we'll see how long he lasts) doesn't know how to use the talent he has.
We're really stuck with UNI, Ill St., and JState...with NDSU and SHSU as dark horses.
The rest of the teams don't have a chance.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
So you'd be OK with 120 teams in the field. Gotcha.kalm wrote:'Whoa! Those tits are just way too big and that's WAY too much football!'

- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
BTW, that too can be a true statement.kalm wrote:'Whoa! Those tits are just way too big

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 66941
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
89Hen wrote:So you'd be OK with 120 teams in the field. Gotcha.kalm wrote:'Whoa! Those tits are just way too big and that's WAY too much football!'
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 34582
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: New Hampshire selection doesn't add up
More like 24 of 90ish as 3 conferences don't participate..Grizalltheway wrote:24 out of 120-some teams is "everyone"?89Hen wrote: The let everyone in sentiment is for people who like participation medals.
To top it off, 60 some are full scholly, as only 7 of those 10 AQ conferences are fully scholly. This season those 60 some teams got 20 spots. Last season it was 21, as it will be most seasons..

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions


