Why?89Hen wrote:Non sequitur.dbackjon wrote:
Or trying to hit a 98 MPH fast ball?
At least a golf ball is stationary.
A moving ball is an incredible variable that makes baseball far more exacting.

Why?89Hen wrote:Non sequitur.dbackjon wrote:
Or trying to hit a 98 MPH fast ball?
At least a golf ball is stationary.

Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.dbackjon wrote:UNI88 wrote:
Does striking a golf ball require more focus than shooting a free throw and or kicking a FG/XP?
Or trying to hit a 98 MPH fast ball?
At least a golf ball is stationary.

Or, an average Joe golfer can hit the shot.kalm wrote:Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.dbackjon wrote:
Or trying to hit a 98 MPH fast ball?
At least a golf ball is stationary.
Hit a 2 iron from a hanging lie in the rough against a slightly hurting left to right cross wind to a postage stamp green with exactly 211 yards to carry the front edge, 221 to the pin, and 226 to the back edge which falls off into a hazard on a green that stimps at 12.5 and is firm.
You can make perfect contact and shape it right but still be fucked.

I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.kalm wrote:Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.dbackjon wrote:
Or trying to hit a 98 MPH fast ball?
At least a golf ball is stationary.
Hit a 2 iron from a hanging lie in the rough against a slightly hurting left to right cross wind to a postage stamp green with exactly 211 yards to carry the front edge, 221 to the pin, and 226 to the back edge which falls off into a hazard on a green that stimps at 12.5 and is firm.
You can make perfect contact and shape it right but still be fucked.

You're correct that golfers don't often whiff, so simply hitting a 98 mph fastball obviously is more difficult, but it's not more exacting in the way we're talking about this. That's why it's a non sequitur.UNI88 wrote:Why?89Hen wrote: Non sequitur.
A moving ball is an incredible variable that makes baseball far more exacting.


Bowling.89Hen wrote:There is no other sport where the fans are as close to the action. I don't believe there is another sport where it it so quiet at the moment leading up to the action. There aren't many sports that require the focus that golf requires. So yeah, it is different than any other sport. Sorry it bothers you.

SunCoastBlueHen wrote:I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.kalm wrote:
Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.
Hit a 2 iron from a hanging lie in the rough against a slightly hurting left to right cross wind to a postage stamp green with exactly 211 yards to carry the front edge, 221 to the pin, and 226 to the back edge which falls off into a hazard on a green that stimps at 12.5 and is firm.
You can make perfect contact and shape it right but still be fucked.

I don't gamble but I would bet the FARM on that one.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.kalm wrote:
Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.
Hit a 2 iron from a hanging lie in the rough against a slightly hurting left to right cross wind to a postage stamp green with exactly 211 yards to carry the front edge, 221 to the pin, and 226 to the back edge which falls off into a hazard on a green that stimps at 12.5 and is firm.
You can make perfect contact and shape it right but still be fucked.


dbackjon wrote:Or, an average Joe golfer can hit the shot.kalm wrote:
Which lends credence to how tough it is. Another part of the argument are the differences between just making contact, solid contact, and proximity to target. Then through in environmental factors as 89 suggested.
Hit a 2 iron from a hanging lie in the rough against a slightly hurting left to right cross wind to a postage stamp green with exactly 211 yards to carry the front edge, 221 to the pin, and 226 to the back edge which falls off into a hazard on a green that stimps at 12.5 and is firm.
You can make perfect contact and shape it right but still be fucked.
Average Joe baseballer wouldn't hit a 98-mph fast ball


Can you make perfect contact with a baseball on the ground if needed or over the fence and hit it too hard?dbackjon wrote:SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.
Now, not having golfed for decades, probably not. But in college when we golfed once a month, I hit some really good shots (along with a lot of crappy ones).
It is a refined skill to hit the type of shot kalm is describing - I won't argue that.
But what we ARE arguing is that it takes more concentration/funeral level of quiet to be able to hit that shot.

I still give you a .5% chance of hitting that shot - so 1/200.dbackjon wrote:SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.
Now, not having golfed for decades, probably not. But in college when we golfed once a month, I hit some really good shots (along with a lot of crappy ones).
It is a refined skill to hit the type of shot kalm is describing - I won't argue that.
But what we ARE arguing is that it takes more concentration/funeral level of quiet to be able to hit that shot.

You would be farmless (though it might take a long, long, long time to get an actual result).89Hen wrote:I don't gamble but I would bet the FARM on that one.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
I think Jon has a better chance of pulling off that shot than you do of making contact in an at bat against a major league pitcher.

Have you watched the long drive competitions where they urge on the fans to get loud while they're hitting? That's akin to the comparison of the 98 mph fastball. They're not trying to hit a 4.25" target. They're trying to just pound the ball.dbackjon wrote:But what we ARE arguing is that it takes more concentration/funeral level of quiet to be able to hit that shot.


The overall odds of a hole in one are 12,500 to 1. That's across all yardages and skill levels. For tour pros it's 2500 to 1.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:I still give you a .5% chance of hitting that shot - so 1/200.dbackjon wrote:
Now, not having golfed for decades, probably not. But in college when we golfed once a month, I hit some really good shots (along with a lot of crappy ones).
It is a refined skill to hit the type of shot kalm is describing - I won't argue that.
But what we ARE arguing is that it takes more concentration/funeral level of quiet to be able to hit that shot.
Kalm's chance of making contact (no bunting) in an MLB at bat is probably closer to 1/1000.

How did a hole in one enter this conversation? That's like me adding that your contact had to be an upper deck bomb.kalm wrote:The overall odds of a hole in one are 12,500 to 1. That's across all yardages and skill levels. For tour pros it's 2500 to 1.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
I still give you a .5% chance of hitting that shot - so 1/200.
Kalm's chance of making contact (no bunting) in an MLB at bat is probably closer to 1/1000.
So again, there are many factors and definitions to work out.
Oh...and GFY, SCBH. Slack lines...

89Hen wrote:Have you watched the long drive competitions where they urge on the fans to get loud while they're hitting? That's akin to the comparison of the 98 mph fastball. They're not trying to hit a 4.25" target. They're trying to just pound the ball.dbackjon wrote:But what we ARE arguing is that it takes more concentration/funeral level of quiet to be able to hit that shot.
Don't listen to two guys who have played in professional tournaments (albeit little ones).

Good call, but I notice they are also silent.CAA Flagship wrote:Bowling.89Hen wrote:There is no other sport where the fans are as close to the action. I don't believe there is another sport where it it so quiet at the moment leading up to the action. There aren't many sports that require the focus that golf requires. So yeah, it is different than any other sport. Sorry it bothers you.![]()


89Hen wrote:Good call, but I notice they are also silent.CAA Flagship wrote: Bowling.![]()

You have to add in that they are not just looking at 98 MPH fastballs. The next pitch could be a slider that starts at your head and breaks over the middle of the plate. What makes hitting a baseball so difficult is recognizing the pitch and reacting to it in a small fraction of a second.dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: Have you watched the long drive competitions where they urge on the fans to get loud while they're hitting? That's akin to the comparison of the 98 mph fastball. They're not trying to hit a 4.25" target. They're trying to just pound the ball.
Don't listen to two guys who have played in professional tournaments (albeit little ones).
Not even close to the same thing. Baseball players aren't just (well, most) going up and swinging - they are trying to place it as well, and control distance, height, etc.
Just admit it, golfers are spoiled pantywaists.

Of course they are, but not because of anything we've discussed in this thread.dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: Have you watched the long drive competitions where they urge on the fans to get loud while they're hitting? That's akin to the comparison of the 98 mph fastball. They're not trying to hit a 4.25" target. They're trying to just pound the ball.
Don't listen to two guys who have played in professional tournaments (albeit little ones).
Not even close to the same thing. Baseball players aren't just (well, most) going up and swinging - they are trying to place it as well, and control distance, height, etc.
Just admit it, golfers are spoiled pantywaists.


SunCoastBlueHen wrote:You have to add in that they are not just looking at 98 MPH fastballs. The next pitch could be a slider that starts at your head and breaks over the middle of the plate. What makes hitting a baseball so difficult is recognizing the pitch and reacting to it in a small fraction of a second.dbackjon wrote:
Not even close to the same thing. Baseball players aren't just (well, most) going up and swinging - they are trying to place it as well, and control distance, height, etc.
Just admit it, golfers are spoiled pantywaists.

dbackjon wrote:SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
You have to add in that they are not just looking at 98 MPH fastballs. The next pitch could be a slider that starts at your head and breaks over the middle of the plate. What makes hitting a baseball so difficult is recognizing the pitch and reacting to it in a small fraction of a second.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Imagine if a golf ball, while you are trying to hit it, moved, started spinning, etc. (Of course it would have to spin silently, otherwise the golfer would start crying)




That's my point. Are you giving dback a 1/200 chance of even making contact? You gotta give him more credit than that.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:How did a hole in one enter this conversation? That's like me adding that your contact had to be an upper deck bomb.kalm wrote:
The overall odds of a hole in one are 12,500 to 1. That's across all yardages and skill levels. For tour pros it's 2500 to 1.
So again, there are many factors and definitions to work out.
Oh...and GFY, SCBH. Slack lines...
Slack lines? Time to get some pics for you. I've been killing it at the beach lately.

kalm wrote:That's my point. Are you giving dback a 1/200 chance of even making contact? You gotta give him more credit than that.SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
How did a hole in one enter this conversation? That's like me adding that your contact had to be an upper deck bomb.
Slack lines? Time to get some pics for you. I've been killing it at the beach lately.