In a letter to UND president the NCAA said North Dakota State law does not alter NCAA policy.
Earl Strinden thinks things are going to work out:“The NCAA’s position regarding its relationship with the State of North Dakota on this issue is set forth in the parties’ binding settlement agreement signed Oct. 26, 2007,” Franklin wrote.
“In that document, it was agreed that the policy will apply to North Dakota unless North Dakota either (1) secures namesake approval by Nov. 30, 2010, or (2) transitions away from the Fighting Sioux nickname and logo before Aug. 15, 2011.”
The state “did not obtain necessary support from the identified Sioux tribes,” he noted, and Kelley’s letter on Friday “makes clear that North Dakota will not transition from the current nickname and logo.”
Consequently, “North Dakota will be subject to the provisions of the policy,” Franklin wrote.
Those provisions include sanctions barring UND teams from hosting post-season tournaments or wearing proscribed attire during such tournaments.
I wouldn't be so sure Earl. What exactly does the NCAA have to gain by acquiescing to UNDs demands? UND has had a lifetime to solve this and the agreement with the NCAA is now more than 3 yrs old.Strinden, a former Republican majority leader in the state House, said he’s convinced the NCAA leaders still could be moved.
“I’m not surprised by this, and I’m not concerned about it,” he said. “The fact that the meeting was going to be an open meeting caused them to cancel, but there will be, I’m confident, a meeting coming up when the Legislature is over.
“They were coming to North Dakota” until they learned the meeting would be open. “Why would they come to North Dakota if they weren’t willing to talk about it?”










