Calling Appaholic...




I think you're right if AE doesn't play.ASUG8 wrote:It's only fun if the other party shows up - I don't think there's a Cat fan (at least publicly) on here except Catman, and he's practically conceded already![]()
Personally, I think the Cats are much improved and will keep it within 40.

accuracyASUMountaineer wrote:I think you're right if AppSt gets lost running out of the tunnel.ASUG8 wrote:It's only fun if the other party shows up - I don't think there's a Cat fan (at least publicly) on here except Catman, and he's practically conceded already![]()
Personally, I think the Cats are much improved and will keep it within 40.

My fault, that's what I get for being nice.Appaholic wrote:accuracyASUMountaineer wrote:
I think you're right if AppSt gets lost running out of the tunnel.

It's hard to believe Waters has been gone that long.ChetSteadman wrote:Yeah, it's not even that fun anymore to make fun of them. You don't even have to embellish how bad they are.
I did find this the other day, while studying up for the game...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Waters
Kinda one sided.....bandl wrote:This thread really has alot of momentum going for it....it might reach 10 posts in the next 24 hours!
Good lord no, that's the equivalent of being an honorary Townson....not happening, that's just too embarassing.ASUG8 wrote:Kinda one sided.....bandl wrote:This thread really has alot of momentum going for it....it might reach 10 posts in the next 24 hours!
Hey, you JMUers won't be doing anything after next week - why don't you be our honorary Catamount?

Quick synopsis of upcoming game.....ChetSteadman wrote:Yeah, it's not even that fun anymore to make fun of them. You don't even have to embellish how bad they are.
I did find this the other day, while studying up for the game...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Waters


Especially not since we got the broom out for a season sweep in basketballbandl wrote:This thread isn't even worthy of a HIJACK...![]()
![]()

I noticed this on his page:ChetSteadman wrote:Yeah, it's not even that fun anymore to make fun of them. You don't even have to embellish how bad they are.
I did find this the other day, while studying up for the game...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Waters" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

WOW, you think we'll keep it within 40, BUT we kept it within 5 in 2009........less you forget the final score.... in Boone 19-15.ASUG8 wrote:It's only fun if the other party shows up - I don't think there's a Cat fan (at least publicly) on here except Catman, and he's practically conceded already![]()
Personally, I think the Cats are much improved and will keep it within 40.

The Cats wrote:WOW, you think we'll keep it within 40, BUT we kept it within 5 in 2009........less you forget the final score.... in Boone 19-15.ASUG8 wrote:It's only fun if the other party shows up - I don't think there's a Cat fan (at least publicly) on here except Catman, and he's practically conceded already![]()
Personally, I think the Cats are much improved and will keep it within 40.
I don't think I've ever witnessed such a delayed reaction to a post - seriously. You're responding to a post I made LAST NOVEMBER? We're closer to the '10 game than the '09 season.The Cats wrote:WOW, you think we'll keep it within 40, BUT we kept it within 5 in 2009........less you forget the final score.... in Boone 19-15.ASUG8 wrote:It's only fun if the other party shows up - I don't think there's a Cat fan (at least publicly) on here except Catman, and he's practically conceded already![]()
Personally, I think the Cats are much improved and will keep it within 40.

As far a when it was posted, I seldom come to the smack board, and he didn't hurt my feelings, I thought it was quite funny, but it was time to set the record straight. As far as "losing to an Armanti-less ASU" I guess you haven't heard, you will be "Armanti-less" this year too.ASUMountaineer wrote:The Cats wrote:
WOW, you think we'll keep it within 40, BUT we kept it within 5 in 2009........less you forget the final score.... in Boone 19-15.True, but for the second year in-a-row WCU lost to an Armanti-less ASU (perhaps you'll remember the last time Armanti played against WCU--79-35). Oh, and welcome to the party, he only posted that 8 months ago.
![]()
As usual, you miss out when it comes to humor. ASUG8 was making a joke (which is clear)...seriously I doubt he was trying to hurt your feelings.

Nice retort. I have heard, but being Armanti-less hasn't seemed to slow ASU's continued dominance of WCU.The Cats wrote:As far a when it was posted, I seldom come to the smack board, and he didn't hurt my feelings, I thought it was quite funny, but it was time to set the record straight. As far as "losing to an Armanti-less ASU" I guess you haven't heard, you will be "Armanti-less" this year too.ASUMountaineer wrote:
True, but for the second year in-a-row WCU lost to an Armanti-less ASU (perhaps you'll remember the last time Armanti played against WCU--79-35). Oh, and welcome to the party, he only posted that 8 months ago.
![]()
As usual, you miss out when it comes to humor. ASUG8 was making a joke (which is clear)...seriously I doubt he was trying to hurt your feelings.

Better late than never, as I'm sure you'd have preferred.ASUMountaineer wrote:However, I am glad you came around 8 months after the fact to "set the record straight."

The Cats wrote:Better late than never, as I'm sure you'd have preferred.ASUMountaineer wrote:However, I am glad you came around 8 months after the fact to "set the record straight."

Congrats on the moral victory.The Cats wrote:
WOW, you think we'll keep it within 40, BUT we kept it within 5 in 2009........less you forget the final score.... in Boone 19-15.