Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
rowdy
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:58 pm
I am a fan of: Southeast Missouri State
A.K.A.: SEMO

Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by rowdy »

Just wondering who you all think are the toughest and weakest conferences in FCS and why
AppGuy04
Level2
Level2
Posts: 712
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:00 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian State
A.K.A.: Resident Apphole
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by AppGuy04 »

Strongest- CAA
Weakest- MEAC
User avatar
ToTheLeft
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:40 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty University

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by ToTheLeft »

Strongest this year:
1. CAA
2. MVFC

Weakest:
1. Pioneer
2. SWAC
3. MEAC
Image
rowdy
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:58 pm
I am a fan of: Southeast Missouri State
A.K.A.: SEMO

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by rowdy »

CAA is a very talented and deep league, but I also like the MVFC; they are really starting to show the depth in that league,

SWAC and MEAC I would agree with those as worst. Mainly because there arent too many stable teams in either league
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by JayJ79 »

How many strong teams does it take to make the whole conference "strong"?

Or I should ask, what percentage of teams? (because 3 teams in the CAA is only 1/4 the conference, while 3 teams in the MVFC is 1/3, and 3 teams is over half in the GWC)
User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12230
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Col Hogan »

JayJ79 wrote:How many strong teams does it take to make the whole conference "strong"?

Or I should ask, what percentage of teams? (because 3 teams in the CAA is only 1/4 the conference, while 3 teams in the MVFC is 1/3, and 3 teams is over half in the GWC)
And I guess we have to define "strong"...is it ranking in a poll that is just fans voting...is it the computer polls...

The GPI (wait for it....the haters will come) is one way to measure conferences as it takes a number of rankings and polls and comes up with a composite ranking
The Colonial Athletic Association, the largest league in the FCS has seven teams in the top 25; the Big Sky Conference has four; the Missouri Valley Football Conference has three; the Great West, Ohio Valley, Southern, and Southland Conferences have two each; and the Big South and Mid-Eastern Athletic Conferences plus the Patriot League have one each
http://www.collegesportingnews.com/stat ... 02gpi.html

I'm not a big fan of the GPI, but I don't know of a better way to rank a conference...I am open for suggestions for a better source...
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by CatMom »

But isn't the GPI based on someone feeding a computer with it/them considering a CAA team a stronger opponent to begin with?
User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12230
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Col Hogan »

CatMom wrote:But isn't the GPI based on someone feeding a computer with it/them considering a CAA team a stronger opponent to begin with?
It's a combination of computer rankings, and the coaches poll and a poll from a place I cannot mention...so it's not just raw "computer" stuff...but subjective votes...

A value is given to each, and out the other end spits the GPI...

As I said, I'm not a big fan, but I don't know of a better system that at least tries to level out bias...
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14773
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

My subjective observation for this year:


Best

1. CAA
2. Missouri Valley
3. Big Sky


Worst (not counting Indies)

1. Pioneer League
2. NEC
3. Ivy League


Most Improved

SWAC


Biggest Drop

1. Ivy League
2. SoCon
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by JayJ79 »

No matter what criteria are used, such rankings will always be subjective to a fairly high degree.

There are "strong" teams in many conferences, but those conferences also have some fairly "weak" members.
the paw
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:32 am
I am a fan of: montana

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by the paw »

JayJ79 wrote:No matter what criteria are used, such rankings will always be subjective to a fairly high degree.

There are "strong" teams in many conferences, but those conferences also have some fairly "weak" members.

every league has its "bottom feeders" :nod:

most know the caa is the strongest but after that the big sky, soco,and mv are about equal! :thumb: :twocents:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by 89Hen »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Most Improved

SWAC
Curious? :|

Do you realize the SWAC Championship game will feature a non-winning team?
Image
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by danefan »

I think there are pretty clearly a couple of tiers in FCS this year.

Top Tier:
Big Sky
CAA
MVFC
SoCon

Second Tier
Great West
Ohio Valley
Southland

Third Tier
Big South
Ivy
MEAC
NEC
Patriot
Pioneer
SWAC

The Third Tier could probably be broken down further, but its hard to do because there is great disparity in these leagues.

I couldn't really argue against someone saying that the SWAC, NEC, Ivy and PFL would be at the lower end of Tier 3 this year because Liberty, Lafayette (and to some extent Holy Cross) and South Carolina State could prop up the Big South, MEAC and Patriot Leagues. However, the bottoms of these leagues are all very weak this year.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by 89Hen »

danefan wrote:this year
Pretty consistant year to year. Southland is always threatening to move up.
Image
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by danefan »

89Hen wrote:
danefan wrote:this year
Pretty consistant year to year. Southland is always threatening to move up.
I think the one that thing has happened is that the 3rd tier teams seem to be getting closer together.

3 or 4 years ago I think there was a pretty clear delination into a 4th tier with the NEC, MAAC and PFL. I'm not so sure its easy to do that anymore.
User avatar
Hambone
Level1
Level1
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:02 pm
I am a fan of: U of North Dakota
Location: Mayer, MN

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Hambone »

danefan wrote:I think there are pretty clearly a couple of tiers in FCS this year.

Top Tier:
Big Sky
CAA
MVFC
SoCon

Second Tier
Great West
Ohio Valley
Southland

Third Tier
Big South
Ivy
MEAC
NEC
Patriot
Pioneer
SWAC

The Third Tier could probably be broken down further, but its hard to do because there is great disparity in these leagues.

I couldn't really argue against someone saying that the SWAC, NEC, Ivy and PFL would be at the lower end of Tier 3 this year because Liberty, Lafayette (and to some extent Holy Cross) and South Carolina State could prop up the Big South, MEAC and Patriot Leagues. However, the bottoms of these leagues are all very weak this year.
With Southern Utah playing some pretty good ball this year, the Great West hopefully will get better with time and the Dakota schools ramping up through the transition. I think you have the conference rated pretty good right now. Hopefully they can move up to a top tier conference......
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FIGHTING HAWKS
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

Hambone wrote:
danefan wrote:I think there are pretty clearly a couple of tiers in FCS this year.

Top Tier:
Big Sky
CAA
MVFC
SoCon

Second Tier
Great West
Ohio Valley
Southland

Third Tier
Big South
Ivy
MEAC
NEC
Patriot
Pioneer
SWAC

The Third Tier could probably be broken down further, but its hard to do because there is great disparity in these leagues.

I couldn't really argue against someone saying that the SWAC, NEC, Ivy and PFL would be at the lower end of Tier 3 this year because Liberty, Lafayette (and to some extent Holy Cross) and South Carolina State could prop up the Big South, MEAC and Patriot Leagues. However, the bottoms of these leagues are all very weak this year.
With Southern Utah playing some pretty good ball this year, the Great West hopefully will get better with time and the Dakota schools ramping up through the transition. I think you have the conference rated pretty good right now. Hopefully they can move up to a top tier conference......
I'd say that the Great West is right on the bubble of being a top-tier conference, if they aren't already. Cal Poly is a perennial playoff contender, UC-Davis may not always get the wins, but they're tough as nails, and SUU, USD and UND have made some big strides this year. Isn't the Great West ranked the 2nd highest in the GPI?
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by 89Hen »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:I'd say that the Great West is right on the bubble of being a top-tier conference, if they aren't already. Cal Poly is a perennial playoff contender, UC-Davis may not always get the wins, but they're tough as nails, and SUU, USD and UND have made some big strides this year. Isn't the Great West ranked the 2nd highest in the GPI?
Maybe on the verge of being on the trail to becoming a bubble of being a top-tier.

Cal Poly is clearly the top program historically, but that's only a 7 year history with 2 trips to the playoffs (1-2 record).

UD-Davis is #2 and they're looking at their 7th straight sub 7 win season.

SUU is improving, but they are 0-9 vs the Big Sky since 2004.

USD and UND... Who knows? The jury is still out on them.
Image
User avatar
tampajag
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7515
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:09 am
I am a fan of: whooties
A.K.A.: hamburger pimp
Location: clearwater, fl bwo tampa bwo baton rouge

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by tampajag »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:My subjective observation for this year:


Best

1. CAA
2. Missouri Valley
3. Big Sky


Worst (not counting Indies)

1. Pioneer League
2. NEC
3. Ivy League


Most Improved

SWAC


Biggest Drop

1. Ivy League
2. SoCon
how do you figure, unless you're saying they're so bad they can't help but improve. :lol: the SWAC is at an all time low.
Image
LastMinuteman
Level1
Level1
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:31 pm
I am a fan of: UMass

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by LastMinuteman »

This thread needs stats. Here's the CAA's:

Non-conference record: 22-12 (2 games remaining: Richmond @Georgetown and Delaware @Navy)
FCS non-conference record: 16-5 (Richmond @Georgetown remaining)

Records vs. Individual Conferences
6-0 vs. Big South
4-1 vs. NEC
2-2 vs. ACC
2-1 vs. MAC
2-1 vs. Ivy
2-1 vs. Patriot (can probably pencil in 3-1)
2-1 vs. MEAC
0-2 vs. Big East
0-1 vs. Big Ten
0-1 vs. Big 12
0-1 vs. MVFC

Best 8 Non-Conference Opponents Defeated
Villanova @Temple
William & Mary @Virginia
Richmond @Duke
New Hampshire @Ball State
...
James Madison @Liberty
Villanova @Penn
UMass/Hofstra vs. Stony Brook
William & Mary @Norfolk State

Worst 8 Non-Conference Opponents Defeated By
Towson @Morgan State
Maine @Albany
Rhode Island @Brown
Northeastern vs. Youngstown State
Northeastern vs. Holy Cross
...
Hofstra @Western Michigan
James Madison @Maryland
Maine @Syracuse

Comments: The drop-off between the FBS wins and the best FCS wins is pretty steep, but I'm curious to see how the other major FCS conferences compare. There was very little interaction between the CAA and the other top tier FCS conferences, just Northeastern's loss to Youngstown State. Given that Youngstown State played the CAA's worst and the MVFC's worst back-to-back and had a much harder time with Northeastern (leading by only 3 with 7 minutes left in the 4th quarter), I'm not sure that can be used against the CAA.
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14773
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

tampajag wrote: how do you figure, unless you're saying they're so bad they can't help but improve. :lol: the SWAC is at an all time low.
SWAC FCS non-conference record

2008: 1-12
2009: 6-4


The SWAC still isn't all that good, but it's way better than last year's dismal performance
User avatar
DJH
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
I am a fan of: The MVC
Location: NORTHERN IOWA

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by DJH »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Hambone wrote:
With Southern Utah playing some pretty good ball this year, the Great West hopefully will get better with time and the Dakota schools ramping up through the transition. I think you have the conference rated pretty good right now. Hopefully they can move up to a top tier conference......
I'd say that the Great West is right on the bubble of being a top-tier conference, if they aren't already. Cal Poly is a perennial playoff contender, UC-Davis may not always get the wins, but they're tough as nails, and SUU, USD and UND have made some big strides this year. Isn't the Great West ranked the 2nd highest in the GPI?
ND lost to an NAIA this year. USD was demolished by UNI by 60 points...

No way are they even close to being considered with the other top conferences at this point.
UNI FIGHT
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by CatMom »

Note all the games against the other "Power" conferences

Records vs. Individual Conferences
6-0 vs. Big South
4-1 vs. NEC
2-2 vs. ACC
2-1 vs. MAC
2-1 vs. Ivy
2-1 vs. Patriot (can probably pencil in 3-1)
2-1 vs. MEAC
0-2 vs. Big East
0-1 vs. Big Ten
0-1 vs. Big 12
0-1 vs. MVFC

BSC, SoCon, SLC - all 0 and 1 MVFC.

Looks like some of us out here need to start scheduling some games against those conferences so we can gloat too.
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by danefan »

CatMom wrote:Note all the games against the other "Power" conferences

Records vs. Individual Conferences
6-0 vs. Big South
4-1 vs. NEC
2-2 vs. ACC
2-1 vs. MAC

2-1 vs. Ivy
2-1 vs. Patriot (can probably pencil in 3-1)
2-1 vs. MEAC
0-2 vs. Big East
0-1 vs. Big Ten
0-1 vs. Big 12

0-1 vs. MVFC


BSC, SoCon, SLC - all 0 and 1 MVFC.

Looks like some of us out here need to start scheduling some games against those conferences so we can gloat too.

Uhh......????????
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Strongest and Weakest in FCS

Post by CatMom »

We'll take some of those teams, yes. Try #4 TCU next time, then we'll talk. It's why I don't put much stock in UCA's win over WKU either.
Post Reply