SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Maine sux
-
Mvemjsunpx
- Level5

- Posts: 14865
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
They seem to have gotten their semifinal prep advice from KC Keeler.Grizalltheway wrote:Maine sux
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
The whole subdivision CAAn't.Gil Dobie wrote:Maine CAAn'tGrizalltheway wrote:Maine sux
Give NDSU their trophy now. Save EWU the embarrassment.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19100
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
We never placed WSU at #2. The committee did. Everyone who knows football, knew WSU was going to lose. Common knowledge.93henfan wrote:Who bragged about CAA defenses, or even the CAA in 2018 on this website? Serious question.
The CAA is DREADFUL. I've been saying it all year. All of FCS, beside NDSU, is dreadful.
We had people saying SDSU was almost as good, and they were curb-stomped and ass-diddled by NDSU last night.
I did find it hilarious that Maine beat the Big Sky co-champion and tournament #2 handily last week, but I certainly never bragged on the CAA.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
So you rated the CAAn't higher? How can that be?SeattleGriz wrote:We never placed WSU at #2. The committee did. Everyone who knows football, knew WSU was going to lose. Common knowledge.93henfan wrote:Who bragged about CAA defenses, or even the CAA in 2018 on this website? Serious question.
The CAA is DREADFUL. I've been saying it all year. All of FCS, beside NDSU, is dreadful.
We had people saying SDSU was almost as good, and they were curb-stomped and ass-diddled by NDSU last night.
I did find it hilarious that Maine beat the Big Sky co-champion and tournament #2 handily last week, but I certainly never bragged on the CAA.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19100
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
You're why St Onge hates life and has the athiest Clits partnering up.93henfan wrote:So you rated the CAAn't higher? How can that be?SeattleGriz wrote:
We never placed WSU at #2. The committee did. Everyone who knows football, knew WSU was going to lose. Common knowledge.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
I will fly to Seattle and shit in your she-shed.SeattleGriz wrote:You're why St Onge hates life and has the athiest Clits partnering up.93henfan wrote:
So you rated the CAAn't higher? How can that be?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Looks like the difference between Maine and EWU was about the same as the difference between The Citadel and Alabama.
BTW does this mean no more MJ until next year?
BTW does this mean no more MJ until next year?
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19100
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
I'll pipe down now.93henfan wrote:I will fly to Seattle and shit in your she-shed.SeattleGriz wrote:You're why St Onge hates life and has the athiest Clits partnering up.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
We can hope.CID1990 wrote:BTW does this mean no more MJ until next year?

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69299
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Put your hand over one eye and read me the 3rd line.93henfan wrote:Maine is a turnover machine today. This is gonna get ugly early.
My God is NDSU going to destroy EWU.They look like midgets compared to NDSU.

Something tells me this lead up is gonna be like the last time we made the chipper. 'Big Fluffy has no chance against that defense and won't be able score...Big Fluffy doesn't play D....'
What's impressive about this win is that we were down 6 starters on D including the all Big Sky MVP and 4 starters on offense including a Payton Award finalist. Pretty nifty bit of coaching by Best and Co.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69299
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
PM me your addy so I can send some 8 year old condolence flowers.93henfan wrote:NDSU by 3+ scores.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25098
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
kalm wrote:Put your hand over one eye and read me the 3rd line.93henfan wrote:Maine is a turnover machine today. This is gonna get ugly early.
My God is NDSU going to destroy EWU.They look like midgets compared to NDSU.
Something tells me this lead up is gonna be like the last time we made the chipper. 'Big Fluffy has no chance against that defense and won't be able score...Big Fluffy doesn't play D....'![]()
What's impressive about this win is that we were down 6 starters on D including the all Big Sky MVP and 4 starters on offense including a Payton Award finalist. Pretty nifty bit of coaching by Best and Co.
My sister could have done it. I saw the Weber/Maine game on TV. Hard to believe those were D1 scholarship athletes.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Technically 19+ is the lowest official number that can be called "3+ scores"93henfan wrote:NDSU by 3+ scores.
So you're going to hold to that..?
BTW: I'm more than willing to put $100 on EWU +19
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Check your math. Three scores is 17.Chizzang wrote:Technically 19+ is the lowest official number that can be called "3+ scores"93henfan wrote:NDSU by 3+ scores.
So you're going to hold to that..?
BTW: I'm more than willing to put $100 on EWU +19
5dimes hasn't opened the game yet, but I'm guessing it'll open at around NDSU -13.5 and I'd definitely bet on NDSU at -13.5.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
2 point conversions are real93henfan wrote:Check your math. Three scores is 17.Chizzang wrote:
Technically 19+ is the lowest official number that can be called "3+ scores"
So you're going to hold to that..?
BTW: I'm more than willing to put $100 on EWU +19
5dimes hasn't opened the game yet, but I'm guessing it'll open at around NDSU -13.5 and I'd definitely bet on NDSU at -13.5.
and 19 points is the minimum 3 score claim
So are you going to homo out of this or stand by your word ..?
Last edited by Chizzang on Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19100
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
17 points forces a team to score at least three times.Chizzang wrote:2 point conversions are real93henfan wrote:
Check your math. Three scores is 17.
5dimes hasn't opened the game yet, but I'm guessing it'll open at around NDSU -13.5 and I'd definitely bet on NDSU at -13.5.
and 19 points is the minimum 3 score claim
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Wins by... is the terminology in the betting worldSeattleGriz wrote:17 points forces a team to score at least three times.Chizzang wrote:
2 point conversions are real
and 19 points is the minimum 3 score claim
not forced scores
The catch here is the "+" symbol 3+ plus scores
to win by 3+ scores you must be ahead by 19 points
8+8+3 = 19
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Hahaha, I forced Chiz into his 6.93 moment.
What do I win?
Just a quick cheat sheet for Chizzang.
A team leading 8-0 is up by one score.
A team leading 16-0 is up by two scores.
A team leading 17-0 is up by 3+ scores.
Just a quick cheat sheet for Chizzang.
A team leading 8-0 is up by one score.
A team leading 16-0 is up by two scores.
A team leading 17-0 is up by 3+ scores.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Nope... 17 is 3 scores93henfan wrote:Hahaha, I forced Chiz into his 6.93 moment.What do I win?
Just a quick cheat sheet for Chizzang.
A team leading 8-0 is up by one score.
A team leading 16-0 is up by two scores.
A team leading 17-0 is up by 3+ scores.
not 3+
Because A team can "take the lead" with three scores in that scenario
so 17 is simply a 3 score lead
19 is the lowest 3+ scores scenario
Remove the "+" symbol and you are correct
3+ is different than 3 scores
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19100
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
Why do you get to choose TDs for the first two and a FG for the third? Wouldn't 3+ in your definition be 3 TDs?Chizzang wrote:Nope... 17 is 3 scores93henfan wrote:Hahaha, I forced Chiz into his 6.93 moment.What do I win?
Just a quick cheat sheet for Chizzang.
A team leading 8-0 is up by one score.
A team leading 16-0 is up by two scores.
A team leading 17-0 is up by 3+ scores.
not 3+
Because A team can "take the lead" with three scores in that scenario
19 is the lowest 3+ scores scenario
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
It's based on the fewest scoring opportunities to tie the gameSeattleGriz wrote:Why do you get to choose TDs for the first two and a FG for the third? Wouldn't 3+ in your definition be 3 TDs?Chizzang wrote:
Nope... 17 is 3 scores
not 3+
Because A team can "take the lead" with three scores in that scenario
19 is the lowest 3+ scores scenario
7 is the highest possible 1 score lead where the kicked extra point is considered a gimmie
8 is a 1+ score lead
9 is a 2 score lead
11 is a 2+ score lead
The question is can you exceed 17 points with 3+ scores..?
Yes you can, so 17 is a three score lead not 3+
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- BlackFalkin
- Level3

- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: RE: Re: SF - (7) Maine @ (3) EWU
He’s got you there, looks like Hen is wrong again... you’d think he’d be tired of getting owned in these EWU threads.Chizzang wrote:It's based on the fewest scoring opportunities to tie the gameSeattleGriz wrote:Why do you get to choose TDs for the first two and a FG for the third? Wouldn't 3+ in your definition be 3 TDs?
7 is the highest possible 1 score lead where the kicked extra point is considered a gimmie
8 is a 1+ score lead
9 is a 2 score lead
11 is a 2+ score lead
The question is can you exceed 17 points with 3+ scores..?
Yes you can, so 17 is a three score lead not 3+
Look hen, I know it hurt to see Maine get their CAA asses beat on the Inferno, but just think of it this way: AT LEASE MAINE CAN SAY THEY LOST TO THE EVENTUAL NATIONAL CHAMPIONS —
- Spoiler: show
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS




What do I win?