You are menstrating everywhere.NAUJacks wrote:You guys are so pathetic talking to a woman like that.
You must be the ass wipe dweebs that sit behind the team and always wished they could play a mans game but you dont have the balls or the intelligence. You must get a woody just thinkin about it yet your not even fit to sniff my jock.
NAU vs. SUU
Re: NAU vs. SUU
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- LumberJackie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
- Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Re: NAU vs. SUU
Thanks for defending my honor bro but I can take care of myself.
I PM'd Chris.
I PM'd Chris.
- LumberJackie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
- Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Re: NAU vs. SUU
uh sorry Ibanez but you misspelled MENSTRUATING! Guess you are really a guy.
Re: NAU vs. SUU
If true...you're dumber than I thoughtLumberJackie wrote: I PM'd Chris.
Re: NAU vs. SUU
You failed to capitalize the first letter of a sentence.LumberJackie wrote:uh sorry Ibanez but you misspelled MENSTRUATING! Guess you are really a guy.
Just sayin
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: NAU vs. SUU
I hope she makes sammies better than she does at pretending to be 3 different people, both male and female. 
- LumberJackie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
- Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Re: NAU vs. SUU
And you are a moron.
You guys really don't want new people on here. I am sure if Chris is a good businessman who owns this Board the object is to boost the number of people coming on here not have
Moderators like you who
on everyone. Why don't all you little
just have a Board of your own so you can
each other.
You guys really don't want new people on here. I am sure if Chris is a good businessman who owns this Board the object is to boost the number of people coming on here not have
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: NAU vs. SUU
It's you who should have a board to yourself. You could create all the accounts and talk to yourself. Or do you do that already over on http://www.bigskyfans.com/lumberjacks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ?LumberJackie wrote:And you are a moron.
You guys really don't want new people on here. I am sure if Chris is a good businessman who owns this Board the object is to boost the number of people coming on here not haveModerators like you who
on everyone. Why don't all you little
just have a Board of your own so you can
each other.
- LumberJackie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
- Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Re: NAU vs. SUU
You need to understand this is a guys group, for the most part, and in guy culture we tear each other down. Constantly. It's all just jokes. Don't be so thin skinned. Don't be so sensitiveLumberJackie wrote:And you are a moron.
You guys really don't want new people on here. I am sure if Chris is a good businessman who owns this Board the object is to boost the number of people coming on here not haveModerators like you who
on everyone. Why don't all you little
just have a Board of your own so you can
each other.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- LumberJackie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
- Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Re: NAU vs. SUU
I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Re: NAU vs. SUU
Sexist? Says who? The "lady" with the "dill doe" avatar? Get over yourself. The board isn't sexist. You just can't handle jokes. If the internet upsets you, I would hate to see you react in the REAL WORLD!LumberJackie wrote:I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 66947
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: NAU vs. SUU
What's with all these legal threats?LumberJackie wrote:I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: NAU vs. SUU
Litigation: it's the new American Way.kalm wrote:What's with all these legal threats?LumberJackie wrote:I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Re: NAU vs. SUU
Dear CS.COM,
I really like the varied insight this place offers but you're acting like every other fan forum/board right now. No need to devolve and resurrect the ghosts of JBB and/or Lakes.
I don't talk smack on message boards now. I don't get any rush other folks seem to and lack the necessary hatred of rivals. But if s*** is talked then s*** must be taken as well. It goes both ways.
Fans of other Big Sky teams seem perturbed that NAU showed up uninvited to their "challenging for the Big Sky lead" party. No way to prove this but it's a feeling...que sera sera.
Go Jacks!
I really like the varied insight this place offers but you're acting like every other fan forum/board right now. No need to devolve and resurrect the ghosts of JBB and/or Lakes.
I don't talk smack on message boards now. I don't get any rush other folks seem to and lack the necessary hatred of rivals. But if s*** is talked then s*** must be taken as well. It goes both ways.
Fans of other Big Sky teams seem perturbed that NAU showed up uninvited to their "challenging for the Big Sky lead" party. No way to prove this but it's a feeling...que sera sera.
Go Jacks!
Re: NAU vs. SUU
JBB and Lakes? Interesting...mtjack wrote:Dear CS.COM,
I really like the varied insight this place offers but you're acting like every other fan forum/board right now. No need to devolve and resurrect the ghosts of JBB and/or Lakes.
I don't talk smack on message boards now. I don't get any rush other folks seem to and lack the necessary hatred of rivals. But if s*** is talked then s*** must be taken as well. It goes both ways.
Fans of other Big Sky teams seem perturbed that NAU showed up uninvited to their "challenging for the Big Sky lead" party. No way to prove this but it's a feeling...que sera sera.
Go Jacks!
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: NAU vs. SUU
THAT and they are trying to validate their obsession and ownership of a forum that has suddenly seen a new power bud blossoming...also they were molested by their drunk uncle when they were kidsmtjack wrote:Dear CS.COM,
I really like the varied insight this place offers but you're acting like every other fan forum/board right now. No need to devolve and resurrect the ghosts of JBB and/or Lakes.
I don't talk smack on message boards now. I don't get any rush other folks seem to and lack the necessary hatred of rivals. But if s*** is talked then s*** must be taken as well. It goes both ways.
Fans of other Big Sky teams seem perturbed that NAU showed up uninvited to their "challenging for the Big Sky lead" party. No way to prove this but it's a feeling...que sera sera.
Go Jacks!

Re: NAU vs. SUU
Let's see...who else has threatened litigation - lakes, opie, jbb, razor, etc...LumberJackie wrote:I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Nothing ever happened - because you have no ground to stand on...
Where are your other personalities lately?
Re: NAU vs. SUU
oceanvue wrote:THAT and they are trying to validate their obsession and ownership of a forum that has suddenly seen a new power bud blossoming...also they were molested by their drunk uncle when they were kidsmtjack wrote:Dear CS.COM,
I really like the varied insight this place offers but you're acting like every other fan forum/board right now. No need to devolve and resurrect the ghosts of JBB and/or Lakes.
I don't talk smack on message boards now. I don't get any rush other folks seem to and lack the necessary hatred of rivals. But if s*** is talked then s*** must be taken as well. It goes both ways.
Fans of other Big Sky teams seem perturbed that NAU showed up uninvited to their "challenging for the Big Sky lead" party. No way to prove this but it's a feeling...que sera sera.
Go Jacks!
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- jacksdude0109
- Level1

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:30 pm
- I am a fan of: NAU
Re: NAU vs. SUU
hey i have such great conversations with myself over thereScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:It's you who should have a board to yourself. You could create all the accounts and talk to yourself. Or do you do that already over on http://www.bigskyfans.com/lumberjacks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ?LumberJackie wrote:And you are a moron.
You guys really don't want new people on here. I am sure if Chris is a good businessman who owns this Board the object is to boost the number of people coming on here not haveModerators like you who
on everyone. Why don't all you little
just have a Board of your own so you can
each other.
- catbooster
- Level2

- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:37 am
- I am a fan of: Montana State
Re: NAU vs. SUU
When it comes to threats of litigation, how can you forget The Fan? or was that on AGS - I think it was on both boards?clenz wrote:Let's see...who else has threatened litigation - lakes, opie, jbb, razor, etc...LumberJackie wrote:I get it. This board is sexist.
Not only that it crosses the line of "jokes". Its sexual harrasment for women. I can give as good as I get but screamin Beagle and Klenz me, a moderator, meaning a legal representative of this board, crossed the line sexually. It doesn't end here trust me.
Nothing ever happened - because you have no ground to stand on...
Where are your other personalities lately?
Re: NAU vs. SUU
No one litigates anymore. Anyone with any smarts just goes Pro Per and gets discovery and summary judgement and demur to summary judgement paperwork off the internet then pays the fees to file them themselves. For $2K I can rack up $200K of legal fees for someone and bury a law firm in paperwork with short response times before they knew what hit them

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 66947
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: NAU vs. SUU
I'll bet you can.oceanvue wrote:No one litigates anymore. Anyone with any smarts just goes Pro Per and gets discovery and summary judgement and demur to summary judgement paperwork off the internet then pays the fees to file them themselves. For $2K I can rack up $200K of legal for someone before they knew what hit them
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: NAU vs. SUU
2 Gs will buy some hookers, a decent amount of blow, and a lot more fun. NOW who's the idiot?oceanvue wrote:No one litigates anymore. Anyone with any smarts just goes Pro Per and gets discovery and summary judgement and demur to summary judgement paperwork off the internet then pays the fees to file them themselves. For $2K I can rack up $200K of legal fees for someone and bury a law firm in paperwork with short response times before they knew what hit them





