Not surprised one bit. Just thought i'd bitch and moan about it a little bit. This wouldn't even be an issue if Sac State would have closed out some of the close losses.siuham wrote:But honestly, you can't be surprised to see WSU get more votes after being Montana, which 90% of the voting base has some sick fetish-esque love for.SDHornet wrote: OK so my response was well over the top, the CS poll is by far the best and obviously I overreacted. I understand WSU had a huge win at home against a UM who has been living life on the edge this season, but let’s be real, WSU still has some tough opponents ahead of them. Their recent BSC wins are against 2 bottom teams and another one of their wins was a close multiple overtime win against UNC…at home. Let me say that again, UNC, a team that just got curb stomped by South Dakota. I’m not saying WSU isn’t good, but their complete body of work doesn’t justify jumping Sac State at this moment. If WSU wins out, then yes I will have no complaints….of course if Sac State wins out then we are back to square one.
Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll
-
Mvemjsunpx
- Level5

- Posts: 14865
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Week 9 ChampionshipSubdivision.com Poll
The way the thing is set up, it's very unlikely the Griz would play on the road in their first game. The only way it would happen is if UM gets paired with the #5 seed.93henfan wrote:I wasn't laughing at the logic, but rather the situation. Will the Griz actually miss a home game in the playoffs?
It's fair to assume UM would host any unseeded game. All the first-round games are unseeded, so they would host if they don't get a bye. If they do get a bye, they would host any of the three unseeded pairings but would have to go on the road if placed with #5.