Top 25 summary 11/2
-
FCS Update
- Level1

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: FCS Football
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
Just one correction.
you say that UCA could take the autobid. UCA still isn't actually eligible until next year.
you say that UCA could take the autobid. UCA still isn't actually eligible until next year.
-
FCS Update
- Level1

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: FCS Football
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
It was a typo. Thanks for catching it. I don't even think they are eligible next year, are they?danefan wrote:Just one correction.
you say that UCA could take the autobid. UCA still isn't actually eligible until next year.
EDIT: Actually, I went to change it and it reads: Not that UCA could win the autobid
- SpiderFan5
- Level1

- Posts: 151
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:53 pm
- I am a fan of: Richmond Spiders
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
I think they are eligible next year
but idk
but idk



________________________________________
'08 National Champions
'07, '09 CAA Champions
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
haha. My mind is playing tricks on me. I though it said "now that".
Sorry.
Sorry.
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
Central Arkansas will be eligible in 2010.
-
FCS Update
- Level1

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: FCS Football
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
Is that official or is that the SLC's proposal to the NCAA?SumItUp wrote:Central Arkansas will be eligible in 2010.
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
It is official. They had a 4 year transition period.FCS Update wrote:Is that official or is that the SLC's proposal to the NCAA?SumItUp wrote:Central Arkansas will be eligible in 2010.
http://www.ucasports.com/sport.asp?acti ... ticle=3172
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
just thought I'd post this "food for thought" for all of you that have been touting UCA this year, and keeping them in your polls. Even the results from this page/thread .
UCA is 2-2 in conference. They beat NWS and NSU, lost to SFA and SELA. 2 of their other wins were over DII schools. Yeah, they beat WKU (0-8), the worst team in the FBS but I didn't take much stock from that when they won that game. Oh and they held off till the end against Hawaii (2-6) who have beaten an FCS(UCA) and 1-7 Washington State. (FBS 117) IMHO, no quality win.
This is not some round about way to try to get TXST in people's minds for the polls. I don't think we belong there....yet.
So let's take a looksee, shall we?FCS Update wrote:Not that UCA could take the autobid, but they seemed to be a player again.
UCA is 2-2 in conference. They beat NWS and NSU, lost to SFA and SELA. 2 of their other wins were over DII schools. Yeah, they beat WKU (0-8), the worst team in the FBS but I didn't take much stock from that when they won that game. Oh and they held off till the end against Hawaii (2-6) who have beaten an FCS(UCA) and 1-7 Washington State. (FBS 117) IMHO, no quality win.
This is not some round about way to try to get TXST in people's minds for the polls. I don't think we belong there....yet.
Last edited by CatMom on Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
FCS Update
- Level1

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: FCS Football
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
UCA hasn't played McNeese.CatMom wrote:
UCA is 2-2 in conference. They beat NWS and NSU, lost to MSU and SELA. 2 of their other wins were over DII schools. Yeah, they beat WKU (0-8), the worst team in the FBS but I didn't take much stock from that when they won that game. Oh and they held off till the end against Hawaii (2-6) who have beaten an FCS(UCA) and 1-7 Washington State. (FBS 117) IMHO, no quality win.
This is not some round about way to try to get TXST in people's minds for the polls. I don't think we belong there....yet.
Their loss previous to this weekend was SFA, who everyone also thought was good. No one in the SLC really stands out. McNeese squeaked by a D-II, but then beat App St. SFA looked good until Texas State shut them down. UCA looked good until yesterday. Hawaii and SFA weren't bad losses.
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
I keep getting those mixed up. It's hard to keep track. Will fix...... 
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
And we put up more points on # 8 TCU than anyone this year...it's still a loss.FCS Update wrote:UCA hasn't played McNeese.CatMom wrote:
UCA is 2-2 in conference. They beat NWS and NSU, lost to MSU and SELA. 2 of their other wins were over DII schools. Yeah, they beat WKU (0-8), the worst team in the FBS but I didn't take much stock from that when they won that game. Oh and they held off till the end against Hawaii (2-6) who have beaten an FCS(UCA) and 1-7 Washington State. (FBS 117) IMHO, no quality win.
This is not some round about way to try to get TXST in people's minds for the polls. I don't think we belong there....yet.
Their loss previous to this weekend was SFA, who everyone also thought was good. No one in the SLC really stands out. McNeese squeaked by a D-II, but then beat App St. SFA looked good until Texas State shut them down. UCA looked good until yesterday. Hawaii and SFA weren't bad losses.
Let's face it, the SLC has become a giant clusterfuck that won't be sorted out until after week 11.
Week 11
McNeese @ TXST
SFA @ SELA
- Skjellyfetti
- Anal

- Posts: 14705
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
And they put up more points on y'all than anyone this year.CatMom wrote:And we put up more points on # 8 TCU than anyone this year...it's still a loss.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
Yep, our D sucked, but that wasn't the point.Skjellyfetti wrote:And they put up more points on y'all than anyone this year.CatMom wrote:And we put up more points on # 8 TCU than anyone this year...it's still a loss.
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
does that mean that UNI is better than Iowa State, Arizona, Penn State, Michigan, Wisconsin, Michigan State, and Indiana?CatMom wrote:Yep, our D sucked, but that wasn't the point.Skjellyfetti wrote:
And they put up more points on y'all than anyone this year.
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: Top 25 summary 11/2
Hey, pay attention to the point being made here or is that beyond your capacity to sit back and evaluate?
I'm not comparing losses, I was being sarcastic. A loss is a loss and only having 1 quality win does not a poll selection make, in my book. ie: neither team deserves a place in the top 25.
If you look at SFA, they only have 2 quality wins, those being McNeese & UCA (which is now questionable) Unless you consider 4 - 4 UND a quality win.
McNeese has 2 quality wins
As I said, the SLC is a clusterfuck and still getting too many props. It will shake out the next 2 weeks.
I'm not comparing losses, I was being sarcastic. A loss is a loss and only having 1 quality win does not a poll selection make, in my book. ie: neither team deserves a place in the top 25.
If you look at SFA, they only have 2 quality wins, those being McNeese & UCA (which is now questionable) Unless you consider 4 - 4 UND a quality win.
McNeese has 2 quality wins
As I said, the SLC is a clusterfuck and still getting too many props. It will shake out the next 2 weeks.