AP shows its liberal bias

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:19 pm

AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

Post by **andy7171** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:10 pm

Sad but true.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:32 pm

andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.

That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:06 pm

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.

But you know they're both right.

CitadelGrad · Post by **CitadelGrad** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:49 pm

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.

Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.

Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?

Post by **kalm** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 9:26 pm

CitadelGrad wrote:
kalm wrote:
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.

Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?

I've never read Daily Kos. I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?

I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Jun 22, 2015 9:27 pm

CitadelGrad wrote:
kalm wrote:
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.

Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?

I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?

I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:17 am

kalm wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.

Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
I've never read Daily Kos. I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?

I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.

Edit 1

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:18 am

kalm wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.

Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?

I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.

Edit 2

The first one wasn't snarky enough?

BTW you might want to use "edit" instead of "quote"

Post by **kalm** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:14 am

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:
I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?

I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.
Edit 2

The first one wasn't snarky enough?

BTW you might want to use "edit" instead of "quote"

I brought my C game last night.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:16 am

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Edit 2

The first one wasn't snarky enough?

BTW you might want to use "edit" instead of "quote"

I brought my C game last night. (So it was an average night)

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:22 am

I've watched Morning Joe on occasion, but only because I dated the executive producer in HS. I'm at work when thats on.

LeadBolt · Post by **LeadBolt** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 7:53 am

Morning Joe may be the least offensive show on MSNBC.

OL FU · Post by **OL FU** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 8:15 am

Personally, think the news part of WSJ is pretty middle of the road, the editorial page certainly isn't.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:33 pm

BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:35 pm

andy7171 wrote:I've watched Morning Joe on occasion, but only because I dated the executive producer in HS. I'm at work when thats on.

He must have been pretty smart to get that gig.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Jun 23, 2015 7:59 pm

houndawg wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

Come to think of it...it is kind of a bitchy whiny post...even for BDK.

Pwns · Post by **Pwns** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:28 am

Don't know if you can say the AP is biased, but come on, you guys can't tell me that if a Hispanic Democrat had a picture like that there'd be no demands for apologies from Donks in congress and that liberal blogs and commentators wouldn't be shouting about systemic racism at the top of their lungs.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:33 am

BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

Shame on his crew for not removing that to being with. I worked on a few campaigns and it was common to remove everything from the walls b/c all it takes is an image of your candidate with something like that or some out of context word to become a meme and a distraction.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:36 am

kalm wrote:
houndawg wrote:

Come to think of it...it is kind of a bitchy whiny post...even for BDK.

He must be experiencing that "not so fresh" feeling this week.

Post by **dbackjon** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 12:42 pm

BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

JFC.

You mamby-pampy Conservatives look for offense anywhere.

Dumbshit Cruz was giving a speech in a ROOM with all the walls covered in gun pics.

If the press hadn't taken pictures, you'd be pissing and moaning about liberal bias.

Grow a pair.

Post by **Col Hogan** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 1:36 pm

dbackjon wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..

Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..

JFC.

You mamby-pampy Conservatives look for offense anywhere.

Dumbshit Cruz was giving a speech in a ROOM with all the walls covered in gun pics.

If the press hadn't taken pictures, you'd be pissing and moaning about liberal bias.

Grow a pair.

True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)

And the photographer had to line it up just right to get the picture...

Then, among the 17 - 20 pictures submitted by the photographer, the photo editor had to pick just that one to use...

Nah, no bias there...

Post by **dbackjon** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 1:41 pm

Col Hogan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:

JFC.

You mamby-pampy Conservatives look for offense anywhere.

Dumbshit Cruz was giving a speech in a ROOM with all the walls covered in gun pics.

If the press hadn't taken pictures, you'd be pissing and moaning about liberal bias.

Grow a pair.
True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)

And the photographer had to line it up just right to get the picture...

Then, among the 17 - 20 pictures submitted by the photographer, the photo editor had to pick just that one to use...

Nah, no bias there...

I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.

As Ibanez said - bad planning on Cruz's campaign.

Post by **Col Hogan** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 1:43 pm

dbackjon wrote:
Col Hogan wrote:
True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)

And the photographer had to line it up just right to get the picture...

Then, among the 17 - 20 pictures submitted by the photographer, the photo editor had to pick just that one to use...

Nah, no bias there...
I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.

As Ibanez said - bad planning on Cruz's campaign.

Take a picture from the normal angle (front) and get the same outcome...

I'll wait over here while you come up with another reason to justify this...

Post by **dbackjon** » Wed Jun 24, 2015 1:55 pm

Col Hogan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.

As Ibanez said - bad planning on Cruz's campaign.
Take a picture from the normal angle (front) and get the same outcome...

I'll wait over here while you come up with another reason to justify this...

Go ahead - you are the one all upset about it. Not justifying anything. Just can't believe how upset a bunch of gun-humpers are about their savior being shown with a gun.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

AP shows its liberal bias

AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias

Re: AP shows its liberal bias