http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/opini ... .html?_r=0
It’s never been so easy to pretend to know so much without actually knowing anything.
It’s never been so easy to pretend to know so much without actually knowing anything.

Good one!Col Hogan wrote:I didn't read the article, but the author is full of caca toro...




Your ignorance makes you feel superior? I guess that is one way to rationalize it.JohnStOnge wrote:I actually take pride in the fact that I am out of the loop on what's going on with popular culture. I mean, you can't help but know about some of what's going on if you also want to watch the news. But I don't feel pressure to keep up with what's going on in pop culture at all. When someone starts talking about some pop culture thing and I never heard of it I feel proud of myself for being able to honestly say I never heard of it. Makes me feel kind of superior actually. I know I shouldn't be that way but if I'm honest about it that's the effect it has.
Sorry, I only read the one sentence I quoted.Ivytalk wrote:Another self-consciously hip article in that self-appointed arbiter of American culture. And I read the whole thing. Three minutes I'll never get back. Thanks for nothing, Joe.

Sure. Everybody's ignorant. Nobody can know about everything. I spend a lot of time watching documentary type stuff on cable channels and news programs. Like today I've been watching episodes of World War II in Color on the American Heros Channel (which used to be the military channel). Still have it on right now. I've never watched American Idol. Can't remember the last time I watched ANY entertainment show unless you count watching Ancient Aliens for laughs (nobody's perfect).Your ignorance makes you feel superior? I guess that is one way to rationalize it.



I'm in the middle here. There are some things that I will stay on top of. There are other things that are the punctuation of pussification. American Idol is a perfect example. Before the Pussification Era was in full swing, American Idol was called Star Search and it was not popular.Pwns wrote:I'm with you there on pop culture JSO. I couldn't care less about American Idol, the vast majority of TV shows and movies, or who Angelina Aniston is married to. I don't see the need to act haughty about it, though. Just consider that there are some well-read, civically-aware people who read People magazine and think sports are for philistines.

Agreed, but you went a step further and said that your ignorance makes you feel superior. We all get to choose our guilty pleasures, but it's arrogant to announce that your guilty pleasures make you superior to others.JohnStOnge wrote:Sure. Everybody's ignorant. Nobody can know about everything...Your ignorance makes you feel superior? I guess that is one way to rationalize it.

Me too.Pwns wrote:I'm with you there on pop culture JSO. I couldn't care less about American Idol, the vast majority of TV shows and movies, or who Angelina Aniston is married to. I don't see the need to act haughty about it, though. Just consider that there are some well-read, civically-aware people who read People magazine and think sports are for philistines.

No worries. I forfeited my basis for feeling superior by going to see Godzilla 2014 today.Agreed, but you went a step further and said that your ignorance makes you feel superior. We all get to choose our guilty pleasures, but it's arrogant to announce that your guilty pleasures make you superior to others.




I want to see Godzilla, but I will probably wait until it's available on demand.JohnStOnge wrote:No worries. I forfeited my basis for feeling superior by going to see Godzilla 2014 today.Agreed, but you went a step further and said that your ignorance makes you feel superior. We all get to choose our guilty pleasures, but it's arrogant to announce that your guilty pleasures make you superior to others.

Great. How big were her tits, Tdog?travelinman67 wrote:Think folks need to prioritize...
...was with a group of friends camping over the weekend, one of whom said she'd never heard of Vladmir Putin.
The 50ish gal reads People magazine, follows everything Kardashian, watches Soaps during the day at work, and has little interest in music outside 60's classic rock.
Typically, she's defensive about her informational choices.
Sadly, she's raised 4 kids.
In 20 years, Kanye West, Beyonce and the other over-hyped pop icons will fade into shadows as they have not contributed to our culture.
You will not develop an understanding of the person whose finger rests on the button of the nuclear missile pointed at your neighborhood listening to narcisstic entertainers.

You already know the answer to that question.D1B wrote:Great. How big were her tits, Tdog?travelinman67 wrote:Think folks need to prioritize...
...was with a group of friends camping over the weekend, one of whom said she'd never heard of Vladmir Putin.
The 50ish gal reads People magazine, follows everything Kardashian, watches Soaps during the day at work, and has little interest in music outside 60's classic rock.
Typically, she's defensive about her informational choices.
Sadly, she's raised 4 kids.
In 20 years, Kanye West, Beyonce and the other over-hyped pop icons will fade into shadows as they have not contributed to our culture.
You will not develop an understanding of the person whose finger rests on the button of the nuclear missile pointed at your neighborhood listening to narcisstic entertainers.

No but recognizing that it's natural for a sexually mature male to be attracted to a sexually mature female of the same dioecious species and that "legal age" is a social construct that has no relevance to our biology does; especially when there are so many people that don't seem to be able to grasp that.Grizalltheway wrote:Does eye **** pubescent girls make you feel superior, too?

So basically, "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed," is your motto.JohnStOnge wrote:No but recognizing that it's natural for a sexually mature male to be attracted to a sexually mature female of the same dioecious species and that "legal age" is a social construct that has no relevance to our biology does; especially when there are so many people that don't seem to be able to grasp that.Grizalltheway wrote:Does eye **** pubescent girls make you feel superior, too?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... s-so-young" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;I got my period when I was 11. Though the thought of a 6th grader becoming physically able to get pregnant is the stuff of most parents' nightmares, it's not as uncommon as you might think. The national average age for a girl to get her first period is 12, and girls can start as early as age 8. Why so young? No one would argue that an 11-year-old is emotionally capable of raising a child. Why would female biology be seemingly so far ahead of psychology when it comes to sexual maturity?
Recent controversy surrounding this topic tags a fatty and preservative-laden diet as the culprit. But a growing mound of research points to some surprising social and evolutionary influences on the timing of a girl's first period, namely parental care.

"Mound". Ha!Ibanez wrote:So basically, "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed," is your motto.JohnStOnge wrote:
No but recognizing that it's natural for a sexually mature male to be attracted to a sexually mature female of the same dioecious species and that "legal age" is a social construct that has no relevance to our biology does; especially when there are so many people that don't seem to be able to grasp that.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... s-so-young" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;I got my period when I was 11. Though the thought of a 6th grader becoming physically able to get pregnant is the stuff of most parents' nightmares, it's not as uncommon as you might think. The national average age for a girl to get her first period is 12, and girls can start as early as age 8. Why so young? No one would argue that an 11-year-old is emotionally capable of raising a child. Why would female biology be seemingly so far ahead of psychology when it comes to sexual maturity?
Recent controversy surrounding this topic tags a fatty and preservative-laden diet as the culprit. But a growing mound of research points to some surprising social and evolutionary influences on the timing of a girl's first period, namely parental care.
- Spoiler: show

They would have to be huge.D1B wrote:Great. How big were her tits, Tdog?travelinman67 wrote:Think folks need to prioritize...
...was with a group of friends camping over the weekend, one of whom said she'd never heard of Vladmir Putin.
The 50ish gal reads People magazine, follows everything Kardashian, watches Soaps during the day at work, and has little interest in music outside 60's classic rock.
Typically, she's defensive about her informational choices.
Sadly, she's raised 4 kids.
In 20 years, Kanye West, Beyonce and the other over-hyped pop icons will fade into shadows as they have not contributed to our culture.
You will not develop an understanding of the person whose finger rests on the button of the nuclear missile pointed at your neighborhood listening to narcisstic entertainers.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed is factually correct, isn't it?Ibanez wrote:So basically, "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed," is your motto.JohnStOnge wrote:
No but recognizing that it's natural for a sexually mature male to be attracted to a sexually mature female of the same dioecious species and that "legal age" is a social construct that has no relevance to our biology does; especially when there are so many people that don't seem to be able to grasp that.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... s-so-young" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;I got my period when I was 11. Though the thought of a 6th grader becoming physically able to get pregnant is the stuff of most parents' nightmares, it's not as uncommon as you might think. The national average age for a girl to get her first period is 12, and girls can start as early as age 8. Why so young? No one would argue that an 11-year-old is emotionally capable of raising a child. Why would female biology be seemingly so far ahead of psychology when it comes to sexual maturity?
Recent controversy surrounding this topic tags a fatty and preservative-laden diet as the culprit. But a growing mound of research points to some surprising social and evolutionary influences on the timing of a girl's first period, namely parental care.
- Spoiler: show
I guess if you want to rationalize sex with a 10 yr old girl. Sure.Cluck U wrote:Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed is factually correct, isn't it?Ibanez wrote: So basically, "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed," is your motto.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... s-so-young" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Spoiler: show
![]()
As far as the early menstruation studies go, did they study the impact of a parent owning a shotgun?