
Gas Guzzler - Conk Check
Animal not allowed in gas guzzler cuz it might ruin the Corinthian Leather - Conk Check
Doesn't care that a liberal is taking his picture abusing an animal - Conk Check
What a fucking dick - Conk Check



He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping. What a Mitt Romney thing to do..JohnStOnge wrote:The dog is fine. Plenty of ventilation. And even if it wasn't fine, as long as it belongs to the people pulling it, it's nobody else's business. It's their property.

It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.



JohnStOnge wrote:It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

I don't know why you would say that. If the atheist perspective is true, for example, NOTHING has innate worth. There is worth in the sense of how much someone is willing to pay for something. A dog is worth, in dollars, what someone else is willing to pay for it. But some "philosophical" concept of "innate worth?" It does not exist. Everything just is. And a Leonardo da Vinci isn't innately "worth" any more than a grain of sand on a beach is.Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human
That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious


Chizzang wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:
It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.
True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human
That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

Indeed...houndawg wrote:Chizzang wrote:
True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human
That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious
![]()
His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.
Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.

You have no innate worth.JohnStOnge wrote:It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

He's a fucking wack job, only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.houndawg wrote:Chizzang wrote:
True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human
That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious
![]()
His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.
Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.


I used to think he was just a really good troll.BlueHen86 wrote:He's a **** wack job,only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.houndawg wrote:
![]()
His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.
Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.



I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.houndawg wrote:I used to think he was just a really good troll.BlueHen86 wrote:
He's a **** wack job,only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.
Making excuses for people who abuse animals - Dildobie Conk CheckGil Dobie wrote:Wonder what the circumstances of the dog being hauled in the back like that. Could be a dog that exhibits possible rabies being taken to a shelter for observation. Could be a government vehicle and not a family vehicle, that restricts the transport of animals this way. Sorry, not a jump to conclusions, Mrs. Kravitz like D1B.



Bronco wrote:-
Who travels with their dog now a days
The new thing is to fly your dog in after you arrive

The same can be said for you. You have zero worth to me.JohnStOnge wrote:It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

Probably every dog that sees him tries to bite him.kalm wrote:I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.houndawg wrote:
I used to think he was just a really good troll.
Let's not generalize. My family is Republican and they are nothing like that. They support gay rights, women's rights, actually many liberal ideas and their dogs are treated better than most people treat their children.houndawg wrote:Not to mention the exhaust fumes.
conks - dog = property
donks - dog = family
clueless asshole.
While the premise is true, we don't know why, I can assure you that any gov't animal control would not put a dog carrier on a wheel chair rack. The dog is in a kennel, it could sit next you on the seat and not bother you.Gil Dobie wrote:Wonder what the circumstances of the dog being hauled in the back like that. Could be a dog that exhibits possible rabies being taken to a shelter for observation. Could be a government vehicle and not a family vehicle, that restricts the transport of animals this way. Was the dog sprayed by sprayed by a skunk? I'm not a jump to conclusions, Mrs. Kravitz like D1B.





...and they get rabies, then Dildobie transports em in something like this:houndawg wrote:Probably every dog that sees him tries to bite him.kalm wrote:
I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.

Conk turkey factory. Taxpayers pay 100% of his insurance costs.HI54UNI wrote:

Don't be such a wet blanket.Ibanez wrote:Let's not generalize. My family is Republican and they are nothing like that. They support gay rights, women's rights, actually many liberal ideas and their dogs are treated better than most people treat their children.houndawg wrote:Not to mention the exhaust fumes.
conks - dog = property
donks - dog = family
clueless asshole.