Ann Coulter is a stupid bitch.bulldog10jw wrote:Every WEEK Ann Coulter writes something worth reading
Though I can understand why libs don't think so since she points out their hypocrisy so well.
Vidav wrote:Ann Coulter is a stupid bitch.bulldog10jw wrote:Every WEEK Ann Coulter writes something worth reading
Though I can understand why libs don't think so since she points out their hypocrisy so well.
What columnist/author IS helping anyone and solving problems ?BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
It's not that they're falling for your canard, it's that they understand that half of your canard is true.Pwns wrote:reading. Check this one out.
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-10-19.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Say whatever you want about AC, but this is spot on. The OWS protests won't accomplish anything except drain city resources with police overtime. Do most of them know that Obma got more money from Goldman Sachs, Citi Group, and BofA than McCain? Probably not, and they'll vote donk anyway because they'll fall for the "democrats represent people, republicans represent fat cats" canard.
I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.bulldog10jw wrote:What columnist/author IS helping anyone and solving problems ?BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
I don't doubt it. Like I said, I think her routine is schtick, even she doesn't believe the stuff she says; but she gets others riled up.houndawg wrote:I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
Letting people know that libs are responsible for everything bad is not trying to raise awareness?BlueHen86 wrote:
Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.
Coulter just attacks libs and blames them for everything. The only person who benefits from this is Ann Coulter. The libs who protest her are wasting their time, just like the conks who listen to her.
If you're watching her for the laughs, you are not wasting your time.bulldog10jw wrote:Letting people know that libs are responsible for everything bad is not trying to raise awareness?BlueHen86 wrote:
Some of them actually try and address issues and raise awareness. It's possible to do that without attacking the people who disagree with you, in fact you might even get them to listen to you, but it doesn't sell as well.
Coulter just attacks libs and blames them for everything. The only person who benefits from this is Ann Coulter. The libs who protest her are wasting their time, just like the conks who listen to her.
If you think someone is funny and entertaining are you really wasting your time?
I call bullshit!houndawg wrote:I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
I question your judgment as well as your eyesight.houndawg wrote:I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...BlueHen86 wrote:I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. He only agenda is to be controversial so that people will either love her or hate her. It's schtick. There is nothing wrong with that, but she isn't helping anyone or solving any problems.
Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.Ivytalk wrote:Rip her all you like, but she's absolutely right about Soros.
The protesters' refusal to acknowledge Wall Street's bankrolling of the Obama campaign is equally confusing.kalm wrote:Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.Ivytalk wrote:Rip her all you like, but she's absolutely right about Soros.
CID1990 wrote:I question your judgment as well as your eyesight.houndawg wrote:
I boned her at a Grateful Dead concert at San Jose State in the early 80's, and I know that she has a good side that you can't see on the radio...
They haven't?CitadelGrad wrote:The protesters' refusal to acknowledge Wall Street's bankrolling of the Obama campaign is equally confusing.kalm wrote:
Which is why she's so confusing. You'd think she might be on the side of the protestors.
