Mark Cuban's thoughts on solving debt problem

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
MrTitleist
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 5932
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:02 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
Location: Missoula, MT

Mark Cuban's thoughts on solving debt problem

Post by MrTitleist »

http://blogmaverick.com/2011/08/10/an-i ... o-discuss/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Good read here, IMO.
ImageImageImageImageImage
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Mark Cuban's thoughts on solving debt problem

Post by danefan »

He's right on a lot of points, most of which have been raised here in bits and pieces.

For example - I completely agree, and have said so in the past, that we don't have a borrowing problem. We have a spending problem. We get zero or negative return on most of our investments because of poor oversight and the investments we do generate gains on are ones that people say Government shouldn't be involved in in the first place (i.e., TARP).

Now, one can argue that return cannot only be measured in financial terms (the same argument, BTW, we make against athletic naysayers who call football budgets wasteful), but I challenge anyone to find (1) a better way to measure return and (2) projects that would still break even if considering intangible returns.
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Mark Cuban's thoughts on solving debt problem

Post by Cap'n Cat »

danefan wrote:He's right on a lot of points, most of which have been raised here in bits and pieces.

For example - I completely agree, and have said so in the past, that we don't have a borrowing problem. We have a spending problem. We get zero or negative return on most of our investments because of poor oversight and the investments we do generate gains on are ones that people say Government shouldn't be involved in in the first place (i.e., TARP).

Now, one can argue that return cannot only be measured in financial terms (the same argument, BTW, we make against athletic naysayers who call football budgets wasteful), but I challenge anyone to find (1) a better way to measure return and (2) projects that would still break even if considering intangible returns.
Word.
Post Reply