This.∞∞∞ wrote:Republicans are not going to look great after this.93henfan wrote:Get the tear machine ready.
Might be the biggest F up to put her on the stand and not just choose a different nominee.
Well then give her an Oscar because she's a better actress than Meryl Streep.93henfan wrote:That's if you choose to believe her. I don't.∞∞∞ wrote: Republicans are not going to look great after this.
Might be the biggest F up to put her on the stand and not just choose a different nominee.
I'm surprised no tears and the attorney isn't handing her tissues yet. They should work on their presentation skills.
Shocker!!!!93henfan wrote:That's if you choose to believe her. I don't.∞∞∞ wrote: Republicans are not going to look great after this.
Might be the biggest F up to put her on the stand and not just choose a different nominee.
I'm surprised no tears and the attorney isn't handing her tissues yet. They should work on their presentation skills.
Another Shocker!!!93henfan wrote:She just doesn't seem like much more than a liberal con artist. Pretty much exactly what I was expecting.
mainejeff wrote:Another Shocker!!!93henfan wrote:She just doesn't seem like much more than a liberal con artist. Pretty much exactly what I was expecting.
I just call them like I see them. Her acting is very poor. She's trying her best to put a cry in her voice and get voice-fry, but she can't get the tears to come. And then her voice gets strong again. Anyone trained in this type setting can tell she's lying.Expected.93henfan wrote:mainejeff wrote:
Another Shocker!!!
You don't like being discriminated against because of where you like to stick your dick, do you? Well guess what?mainejeff wrote:Blah blah blah....Republicans must use the Senate Judiciary Committee as Shady Pines then.AZGrizFan wrote:
More fake news.
SIXTEEN of the oldest 18 members of the House are Democrat. Conversely, 11 of the youngest 15 in the House are Republican.
I do think it's rich when someone who hides behind ONE of these categories goes out of their way to call out someone in ANOTHER of the categories. What's good for the goose is good for the gander....equal opportunity in employment for all qualified persons and prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation, pregnancy and pregnancy related conditions, gender identity, national origin, ancestry, age, veteran status, disability unrelated to job requirements, genetic information, military service, or other protected status.
93henfan wrote:And a butter face!mainejeff wrote:Wow....Ford still has a teenage sex kitten voice.
Don't worry about where I stick my massive cock. I'm talking about 85 year olds who have no business mucking up the works of important government functions.AZGrizFan wrote:You don't like being discriminated against because of where you like to stick your dick, do you? Well guess what?mainejeff wrote:
Blah blah blah....Republicans must use the Senate Judiciary Committee as Shady Pines then.
I do think it's rich when someone who hides behind ONE of these categories goes out of their way to call out someone in ANOTHER of the categories. What's good for the goose is good for the gander....equal opportunity in employment for all qualified persons and prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation, pregnancy and pregnancy related conditions, gender identity, national origin, ancestry, age, veteran status, disability unrelated to job requirements, genetic information, military service, or other protected status.
Evidence usually works better than theater∞∞∞ wrote:Expected.93henfan wrote:
I just call them like I see them. Her acting is very poor. She's trying her best to put a cry in her voice and get voice-fry, but she can't get the tears to come. And then her voice gets strong again. Anyone trained in this type setting can tell she's lying.
There's really no way for Dr. Ford to convince you people. If she's stoic and straight, you say it couldn't have happened because she didn't tear up. When she tears up, you say she's faking it.
If she is butter then what is this?.....93henfan wrote: And a butter face!
Just to show you that I am a good sport......93henfan wrote:Teflon.
Yeah....this is just bizarre.∞∞∞ wrote:Seriously Grassley? They have more than a week to prepare and the format is already a shitshow.
They hired a female prosecutor so they wouldn't be seen as typical old white men, then Grassley interrupts the prosecutor. Grassley has no idea how to chair this testimony.mainejeff wrote:Yeah....this is just bizarre.∞∞∞ wrote:Seriously Grassley? They have more than a week to prepare and the format is already a shitshow.
All he can think about at this point is his meatloaf and mashed 'taters lunch......and then when afternoon bingo starts.......∞∞∞ wrote:They hired a female prosecutor so they wouldn't be seen as typical old white men, then Grassley interrupts the prosecutor. Grassley has no idea how to chair this testimony.mainejeff wrote:
Yeah....this is just bizarre.
Looking forward to you being so open minded about Kavanaugh and his testimony.∞∞∞ wrote:Expected.93henfan wrote:
There's really no way for Dr. Ford to convince you people. If she's stoic and straight, you say it couldn't have happened because she didn't tear up. When she tears up, you say she's faking it.
And isn't she claustrophobic and afraid of airplanes? Are they taking Amtrak or driving from California to Rehoboth each weekend?93henfan wrote:See what I was saying about traffic? We have people coming from fucking Palo Alto, CA to vacation in Slower Delaware now.
This is why I really hate this woman (and her family for that matter).
Yes, I think everyone agrees on that.mainejeff wrote:This grandstanding.....good grief. These Senators suck.
