houndawg wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:Why is it acceptable for Mexicans to illegally graze on American public services but it isn't acceptable for these cattle to graze on public lands? Shouldn't Obama provide the cattle with public housing, EBT cards and Obamaphones?
1) Illegals keep wages down for the folk that hire them with impunity. Jail these scumsuckers and the illegal problem vanishes overnight. They won't come if there ain't no work.
2) It
is acceptable to graze cattle on public lands, but you have to pay your fees and graze where you're supposed to.
Don't know if your post was written before or after you took your meds, but next time try it the other way...
Yeah, you can crack down on employers of illegals, but that isn't going to happen when the Obama administration is encouraging greater illegal immigration by offering up subsidized housing food stamps, ID cards, driver licenses, healthcare and a myriad of public services, including education grants. For Mexicans thinking of jumping the border and those already here, it doesn't pay not to be an illegal alien.
The Bundy family was grazing that land long before the BLM took it over. In fact, the family was grazing that land before there was a BLM. So why does the federal government need to own 89.5% of Nevada's land area? Why does the BLM insist on assessing and collecting fees that don't even cover the cost of collecting those fees? What exactly is the BLM going to do with that land once Bundy's cattle are gone? How much will it cost to do whatever the BLM plans to do with it?
Don't even bring up the desert turtle bullshit.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787
