kalm wrote:Joe the Black Knight, getting owned by a teenager again.JoltinJoe wrote:
You grasp so little.
You make many great points about the logical, scientific arguments made by the priesthood. Must just be a pastime.
Yea, yea, yea.youngterrier wrote:I have the temptation to say the same thing to you sometimesJoltinJoe wrote:
Get an education and then speak to me.
I admit when I'm wrong, but only when I'm wrong. If you would stick to the subjects at hand, and educate me, as opposed to sticking to your routine ad hominem attack, perhaps I would learn something. Really, you're just squirming, and whenever we squeeze an answer out of you, it really isn't logically moving.JoltinJoe wrote:kalm wrote:
Joe the Black Knight, getting owned by a teenager again.
You make many great points about the logical, scientific arguments made by the priesthood. Must just be a pastime.
Keep encouraging this know-nothing know-it-all. The love and admiration of you on cs.com will carry him far in life.
Go read your discussion about why people believe God exists, and then ponder why I don't take you seriously.youngterrier wrote:I admit when I'm wrong, but only when I'm wrong. If you would stick to the subjects at hand, and educate me, as opposed to sticking to your routine ad hominem attack, perhaps I would learn something. Really, you're just squirming, and whenever we squeeze an answer out of you, it really isn't logically moving.JoltinJoe wrote:
Keep encouraging this know-nothing know-it-all. The love and admiration of you on cs.com will carry him far in life.
I never said the specific reasons why people thought God exists, rather how people derive the existence of the universe from God or some other entity.JoltinJoe wrote:Go read your discussion about why people believe God exists, and then ponder why I don't take you seriously.youngterrier wrote: I admit when I'm wrong, but only when I'm wrong. If you would stick to the subjects at hand, and educate me, as opposed to sticking to your routine ad hominem attack, perhaps I would learn something. Really, you're just squirming, and whenever we squeeze an answer out of you, it really isn't logically moving.
My wife and I are going out to a friend's house. It's Saturday night. You and kalm can continue professing your admiration for each other on the internet,
Seahawks08 wrote:How the hell did this thread go from #Winning to a bitching match?! Back to the pirates...ARRRRG!!
Thanks for getting this back on the rails....well, at least near the amusement park.Seahawks08 wrote:There we go!
I have some of those. Let me do a look.Seahawks08 wrote:someone say pilates? Let's do some stretching on this beautiful Saturday night!
I try to love and admire everyone. Those from directional universities, smart young whipper snappers, elitists, etc. I don't expect you to understand.JoltinJoe wrote:kalm wrote:
Joe the Black Knight, getting owned by a teenager again.
You make many great points about the logical, scientific arguments made by the priesthood. Must just be a pastime.
Keep encouraging this know-nothing know-it-all. The love and admiration of you on cs.com will carry him far in life.
How high were you when you wrote this?youngterrier wrote:and to the thread, it confuses post hac ergo propter fallacies with true causation. Sure, it's trying to make a point but let's take the example a step farther.
I got arrested for Tax evasion because I didn't pay my taxes. By this logic, there is no correlation with the result and the action. We know for a fact that there is correlation
Other examples: I stopped smoking and my health improved. No correlation.
I floored the accelerator and went really fast in my car. No correlation.
Sun went down, it got dark. No correlation (or as Bill O'Reilly would say "You can't explain that!")
The list goes on.
But to add to the thread, I'd wager that Car production is the cause of the devaluation of the dollar since 1913, while we're at it.
Where is Bandl when a quality hijack is needed....Seahawks08 wrote:GLOBAL WARMING FTW!!!
I am not as good as Bandl and his little brother andy.Seahawks08 wrote:we need to hijack the hijackers. this can't go on!
Aaaarrrrrrrrrr!Seahawks08 wrote:We've been lied to all this time. How can there not be more pirates when you have some that look like this:
Avast, me hearties! 
Hello, sugarcake! How much for a handjob?Seahawks08 wrote:
That asserts a correlation between drugs and gibberish.Skjellyfetti wrote:How high were you when you wrote this?youngterrier wrote:and to the thread, it confuses post hac ergo propter fallacies with true causation. Sure, it's trying to make a point but let's take the example a step farther.
I got arrested for Tax evasion because I didn't pay my taxes. By this logic, there is no correlation with the result and the action. We know for a fact that there is correlation
Other examples: I stopped smoking and my health improved. No correlation.
I floored the accelerator and went really fast in my car. No correlation.
Sun went down, it got dark. No correlation (or as Bill O'Reilly would say "You can't explain that!")
The list goes on.
But to add to the thread, I'd wager that Car production is the cause of the devaluation of the dollar since 1913, while we're at it.