Wait! You mean they’ve adjusted their predictions based on new observable data?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 9:42 pm Say it isn't so! Dipshit fraudsters have to drop the worst climate models because they were bullshit. Hopefully this puts an end to the idiot climate grifters making stupid catastrophic claims and screwing businesses over to meet "implausible" goals.
For those struggling with what that means, if you were peddling climate change doom, you look like a doofus who doesn't understand science.
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rc ... ially-dead
The international committee responsible for the official scenarios that feed into climate modeling that are the basis for most projective climate research and the assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios.
Big news: The new framework has eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades — specifically, RCP8.5, SSP5-8.5, and SSP3-7.0. This is an absolutely huge development in climate science which will have lasting impacts across research and policy.“For the 21st century, this range will be smaller than assessed before: on the high-end of the range, the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy and recent emission trends.”
Like science is supposed to do?!?
Those dirty bastards..
I first heard about this a short while back from your bestie, Michael Mann. 
