The question of God is the "most important" question mankind faces.
But since we can't know anything about God, anyone who expresses a faith in God is "committed" and "foolish."
No wonder the guy flunked out of Harvard.
Maybe POD, now outed as a fraud, will throw a hissy fit and leave, like Cobblestone did?andy7171 wrote:Yeah. POD is the reincarnation of Cobblestone just making **** up.

So there should be a Statute of Limitations on all crimes?JoltinJoe wrote:Good for them.kalm wrote:Accountability...ain't just a river in Egypt...![]()
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/catholi ... attackers/
The law in question that "makes it easier for victims of child sex abuse to sue their attackers," is actually a law to abolish the Statute of Limitations.
Statutes of Limitation exist to protect procedural and substantive fairness. Any law that abolishes the statute of limitations is regressive and, in this case, discriminatory.

close Joe...JoltinJoe wrote:Chizzang, the laziest intellect ever.
The question of God is the "most important" question mankind faces.
But since we can't know anything about God, anyone who expresses a faith in God is "committed" and "foolish."
No wonder the guy flunked out of Harvard.

This law concerns civil suits -- not criminal proceedings.dbackjon wrote:So there should be a Statute of Limitations on all crimes?JoltinJoe wrote:
Good for them.
The law in question that "makes it easier for victims of child sex abuse to sue their attackers," is actually a law to abolish the Statute of Limitations.
Statutes of Limitation exist to protect procedural and substantive fairness. Any law that abolishes the statute of limitations is regressive and, in this case, discriminatory.

Phew! I'm glad the church is spending millions to defend the ideals of procedural and substantive fairness in civil suits. If it had been criminal law, that would have been bullshit!!!JoltinJoe wrote:This law concerns civil suits -- not criminal proceedings.dbackjon wrote:
So there should be a Statute of Limitations on all crimes?
Statutes of limitations for crimes involve different policy concerns.
What the Church is fighting to preserve is its inner-city schools that provide a great education for students that others don't care about; its soup kitchens that feed the hungry; and it's shelters that take in the poor, the homeless, the abused.kalm wrote:Phew! I'm glad the church is spending millions to defend the ideals of procedural and substantive fairness in civil suits. If it had been criminal law, that would have been bullshit!!!JoltinJoe wrote:
This law concerns civil suits -- not criminal proceedings.
Statutes of limitations for crimes involve different policy concerns.


andy7171 wrote:We don't care about all the good the Church is doing! Just the minuscule bad!!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you didn't say foolish, but you have plainly implied it. But I'll accept your retraction of your implicit charge.Chizzang wrote:close Joe...JoltinJoe wrote:Chizzang, the laziest intellect ever.
The question of God is the "most important" question mankind faces.
But since we can't know anything about God, anyone who expresses a faith in God is "committed" and "foolish."
No wonder the guy flunked out of Harvard.
I like where you're going
Firstly:
Yes God is the single most important question
and it is for several reasons - not just the spiritual aspect and/or metaphysical
But also because of how we wrestles with Islam - Dark age shenanigans in the modern world
Secondly:
I said committed - I never said foolish
You do a disservice to your point by lying and misleading Joe
(Try to be more honest)
It's difficult to discuss something as complicated as the whole of Catholicism
with a "committed" individual - the conversation is already over before it begins

Okee Dokee... I get itJoltinJoe wrote:Maybe you didn't say foolish, but you have plainly implied it. But I'll accept your retraction of your implicit charge.Chizzang wrote:
close Joe...
I like where you're going
Firstly:
Yes God is the single most important question
and it is for several reasons - not just the spiritual aspect and/or metaphysical
But also because of how we wrestles with Islam - Dark age shenanigans in the modern world
Secondly:
I said committed - I never said foolish
You do a disservice to your point by lying and misleading Joe
(Try to be more honest)
It's difficult to discuss something as complicated as the whole of Catholicism
with a "committed" individual - the conversation is already over before it begins
I'll be the first to say that there is a lot of bureaucracy in any large organization. And with 1.2 billion adherents, Catholicism is one of the world's largest organizations, and therefore one of the largest bureaucracies.
But this is the point a "committed" outsider, repulsed by the bureaucracy, doesn't understand. In those moments of life of deepest despair, or gravest loss, that any individual can experience, the Catholic Church works at its absolute finest, and is probably better than any other institution in the world.
So maybe this will help you understand, despite all the flaws of a large, world-wide organization -- run by imperfect men who themselves frequently get caught up in all the bureaucracy and rules they make up; and, frequently make cowardly decisions that turn out horribly and look even worse in retrospect -- people remain faithful to the Church. No matter what, at its core, the light of Christ shines.


Chizzang wrote:Okee Dokee... I get itJoltinJoe wrote:
Maybe you didn't say foolish, but you have plainly implied it. But I'll accept your retraction of your implicit charge.
I'll be the first to say that there is a lot of bureaucracy in any large organization. And with 1.2 billion adherents, Catholicism is one of the world's largest organizations, and therefore one of the largest bureaucracies.
But this is the point a "committed" outsider, repulsed by the bureaucracy, doesn't understand. In those moments of life of deepest despair, or gravest loss, that any individual can experience, the Catholic Church works at its absolute finest, and is probably better than any other institution in the world.
So maybe this will help you understand, despite all the flaws of a large, world-wide organization -- run by imperfect men who themselves frequently get caught up in all the bureaucracy and rules they make up; and, frequently make cowardly decisions that turn out horribly and look even worse in retrospect -- people remain faithful to the Church. No matter what, at its core, the light of Christ shines.
It was important for humans to make up answers for things they didn't understand about the world
We are surrounded by the mysteries of life
Answers make us feel better
Even bullsh!t answers derived from nonsense can still have a soothing effect
Like this for example:
How the world was made
and our role in the greater universe - life after death - Immortal souls and so forth
These are serious questions that require a little more honesty than just making it up
But we all have to do what works for us


It's probably easier to start with what's actually NOT made up... and go from thereandy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?

OK, thanks for answering a direct question.Chizzang wrote:It's probably easier to start with what's actually NOT made up... and go from thereandy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?

Noah's Ark?andy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?
Blacks have bigger dicksandy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?

Take that up with JMU_DJ, I'm of the New Covenant.kalm wrote:Noah's Ark?andy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?

"Why does Cleets have to be smarmily vague all the time?"bandl wrote:Blacks have bigger dicksandy7171 wrote:What made up answers are we talking about?
Asians are smarter
Women know how to drive
What's the question?

Okay... What's a saintandy7171 wrote:OK, thanks for answering a direct question.Chizzang wrote:
It's probably easier to start with what's actually NOT made up... and go from there

You could have just actually read his post addressing that.andy7171 wrote:OK, thanks for answering a direct question.Chizzang wrote:
It's probably easier to start with what's actually NOT made up... and go from there

Jesus never talked about Saints, because there weren't any.Chizzang wrote:Okay... What's a saintandy7171 wrote: OK, thanks for answering a direct question.
Does Jesus tell us about Gods relationship with saints..?
and the myriad of other entirely concocted from nonsense paraphernalia that Jesus had nothing to do with
It's a really really LONG list of things that are attached to Catholicism
that has absolutely nothing to do with Jesus - and is just "made up" stuff
![]()
So like I said its much easier to discuss what is not fabricated extra stuff
I honestly think that's Cleet's best piece of work here. Ever.Grizalltheway wrote:
Or was the hot dog analogy a little too deep?

andy7171 wrote:Jesus never talked about Saints, because there weren't any.Chizzang wrote:
Okay... What's a saint
Does Jesus tell us about Gods relationship with saints..?
and the myriad of other entirely concocted from nonsense paraphernalia that Jesus had nothing to do with
It's a really really LONG list of things that are attached to Catholicism
that has absolutely nothing to do with Jesus - and is just "made up" stuff
![]()
So like I said its much easier to discuss what is not fabricated extra stuff
Saints are regular people who lived and acted as Jesus would have, and we pray for them to pray for us. Because they figured shit out and stuff.