911 No Plane Theory Angry Birds Edition

[grizzaholic]

The max cruising speed of the aircraft used in 9/11 is approx. 560mph.

THATS MY POINT EXACTLY! Not only was the 767-200 flying faster than it's maximum cruising speed (allegedly)- that speed can only be attained at about 35,000 feet where the air is much thinner than it is at sea-level!

Boeing 767-200 MAX cruising speed is 493 knots, (567 mph) @ 35,000 ft

Now, you're telling me some guys who couldn't even fly a Cessna were somehow able to also break the laws of aerodynamics in the process of piloting a much more advanced and complicated aircraft and pulling off maneuvers even experienced pilots couldn't? Hitting their targets dead-center?

"Cruising speed" can only be achieved for in a 767-200 @ 35,000 FEET WHERE THE AIR IS MUCH THINNER!

Air at sea-level is about 130X denser than at cruise speed! The turbines can't operate near 560 MPH at sea-level it's totally impossible, not to mention if it could, it would be totally uncontrollable.

@ 27:28 in the video a guy calls Boeing to ask how fast the max speed of a 767 at 700 feet would be:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Y4zfl8 ... g&index=13[/youtube]
Boeing representative's answer if it's possible a plane could fly that fast: "NOT A CHANCE!"

So why does it matter?

[93henfan]

Spandos: You're quoting safe speeds, not "we just hijacked this plane, we plan to crash it into a building, and if it happens to break apart on the descent, oh well" speeds.

C'mon man. Think outside what your conspiracy buddies repeat over and over until they think its right.

[Ibanez]

The max cruising speed of the aircraft used in 9/11 is approx. 560mph.

THATS MY POINT EXACTLY! Not only was the 767-200 flying faster than it's maximum cruising speed (allegedly)- that speed can only be attained at about 35,000 feet where the air is much thinner than it is at sea-level!

Boeing 767-200 MAX cruising speed is 493 knots, (567 mph) @ 35,000 ft

Now, you're telling me some guys who couldn't even fly a Cessna were somehow able to also break the laws of aerodynamics in the process of piloting a much more advanced and complicated aircraft and pulling off maneuvers even experienced pilots couldn't? Hitting their targets dead-center?

"Cruising speed" can only be achieved for in a 767-200 @ 35,000 FEET WHERE THE AIR IS MUCH THINNER!

Air at sea-level is about 130X denser than at cruise speed! The turbines can't operate near 560 MPH at sea-level it's totally impossible, not to mention if it could, it would be totally uncontrollable.

@ 27:28 in the video a guy calls Boeing to ask how fast the max speed of a 767 at 700 feet would be:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Y4zfl8 ... g&index=13[/youtube]
Boeing representative's answer if it's possible a plane could fly that fast: "NOT A CHANCE!"

I didn't watch your video. Where is the evidence of the planes flying that fast?

[CID1990]

THATS MY POINT EXACTLY! Not only was the 767-200 flying faster than it's maximum cruising speed (allegedly)- that speed can only be attained at about 35,000 feet where the air is much thinner than it is at sea-level!

Boeing 767-200 MAX cruising speed is 493 knots, (567 mph) @ 35,000 ft

Now, you're telling me some guys who couldn't even fly a Cessna were somehow able to also break the laws of aerodynamics in the process of piloting a much more advanced and complicated aircraft and pulling off maneuvers even experienced pilots couldn't? Hitting their targets dead-center?

"Cruising speed" can only be achieved for in a 767-200 @ 35,000 FEET WHERE THE AIR IS MUCH THINNER!

Air at sea-level is about 130X denser than at cruise speed! The turbines can't operate near 560 MPH at sea-level it's totally impossible, not to mention if it could, it would be totally uncontrollable.

@ 27:28 in the video a guy calls Boeing to ask how fast the max speed of a 767 at 700 feet would be:
Boeing representative's answer if it's possible a plane could fly that fast: "NOT A CHANCE!"