Obama should have kept his mouth shut ...

[blueballs]

And the funny thing is, I don't think he needs to do these almost fire-sale type political things to win in the fall - he's scorching earth where there's no need to. Instead, all he's doing is getting people who don't know any better foaming at the mouth over some perceived slight or defeat that isn't anything of the kind. This isn't the leadership I signed up for.

Obama can't stand to lose, period. He's even a piss-poor winner. But if the court (as they probably will) strikes down Obama-care what, exactly, does Obama have to run on? It's his only real legislative "accomplishment"--and I use that term VERY loosely.

Can "We killed Bin Laden" be enough to get reelected?

Perhaps he will remind us how Dodd Frank has made all our lives so much better...

[bluehenbillk]

[But if the court (as they probably will) strikes down Obama-care what, exactly, does Obama have to run on?

Agreed. However, his "opponent" is going to be Romney. Romney can't win the general election. Obama could lose it, but Romney can't win it.

[D1B]

And the funny thing is, I don't think he needs to do these almost fire-sale type political things to win in the fall - he's scorching earth where there's no need to. Instead, all he's doing is getting people who don't know any better foaming at the mouth over some perceived slight or defeat that isn't anything of the kind. This isn't the leadership I signed up for.

Obama can't stand to lose, period. He's even a piss-poor winner. But if the court (as they probably will) strikes down Obama-care what, exactly, does Obama have to run on? It's his only real legislative "accomplishment"--and I use that term VERY loosely.

Can "We killed Bin Laden" be enough to get reelected?

YOU are fucking delusional.

[GannonFan]

[But if the court (as they probably will) strikes down Obama-care what, exactly, does Obama have to run on?

Agreed. However, his "opponent" is going to be Romney. Romney can't win the general election. Obama could lose it, but Romney can't win it.

This I agree with. Romney can't win a nationwide general election. What Obama has done or hasn't done will matter little in the grand scheme of things - his opponent just can't win.

[LeadBolt]

[But if the court (as they probably will) strikes down Obama-care what, exactly, does Obama have to run on?

Agreed. However, his "opponent" is going to be Romney. Romney can't win the general election. Obama could lose it, but Romney can't win it.

You have hit the nail on the head. Unless Obama does something catastrophic to lose the election, it appears that we will have 4 more years, no matter what Romney does, to find out what Obama will do with increased flexibilty....

[UNI88]

Agreed. However, his "opponent" is going to be Romney. Romney can't win the general election. Obama could lose it, but Romney can't win it.

You have hit the nail on the head. Unless Obama does something catastrophic to lose the election, it appears that we will have 4 more years, no matter what Romney does, to find out what Obama will do with increased flexibilty....

True but Santorum and Gingrich have even less of a chance. What can and will the Republicans do to take advantage of the golden opportunity that they are being given?

[Cap'n Cat]

Man, the hatred of black people with power among so many of the Conks here.

Give it up, guys. He's a solid president and will be even more successful in the next eight years.

[89Hen]

Man, the hatred of black people with power among so many of the Conks here.

Give it up, guys. He's a solid president and will be even more successful in the next eight years.

How do you keep a straight face when you type either of those?

[andy7171]

Man, the hatred of black people with power among so many of the Conks here.

Give it up, guys. He's a solid president and will be even more successful in the next eight years.

How do you keep a straight face when you type either of those?

You missed one.

[GannonFan]

Man, the hatred of black people with power among so many of the Conks here.

Give it up, guys. He's a solid president and will be even more successful in the next eight years.

How do you keep a straight face when you type either of those?

I'm actually wondering when we changed Presidential terms to 8 years at a pop. Who knew?

[Grizalltheway]

How do you keep a straight face when you type either of those?

I'm actually wondering when we changed Presidential terms to 8 years at a pop. Who knew?

Seems like we effectively have.

[Cap'n Cat]

How do you keep a straight face when you type either of those?

You missed one.

The public will demand a third term.

Seriously, I can't understand why you people are so hateful about Obama. The guy is no asshole like Gangrene. He's no holy roller fvck like Santucci and he's not a marshmallow head like Romney. So the guy proposes policy you don't agree with - BFD - does it warrant the radical hate?

Ain't a fvcking thing changed under him for the negative and nothing will. You guys just gotta hate him because he's black - anything else does not make sense or reflect reality....or reasonableness.

[JoltinJoe]

You missed one.

The public will demand a third term.

Seriously, I can't understand why you people are so hateful about Obama. The guy is no ******* like Gangrene. He's no holy roller fvck like Santucci and he's not a marshmallow head like Romney. So the guy proposes policy you don't agree with - BFD - does it warrant the radical hate?

Ain't a fvcking thing changed under him for the negative and nothing will. You guys just gotta hate him because he's black - anything else does not make sense or reflect reality....or reasonableness.

Four years of deficits exceeding a trillion dollars a year -- and not a peep out of this guy about the need to get deficits under control.

He's no Bill Clinton.

[Wedgebuster]

The public will demand a third term.

Seriously, I can't understand why you people are so hateful about Obama. The guy is no ******* like Gangrene. He's no holy roller fvck like Santucci and he's not a marshmallow head like Romney. So the guy proposes policy you don't agree with - BFD - does it warrant the radical hate?

Ain't a fvcking thing changed under him for the negative and nothing will. You guys just gotta hate him because he's black - anything else does not make sense or reflect reality....or reasonableness.

Four years of deficits exceeding a trillion dollars a year -- and not a peep out of this guy about the need to get deficits under control.

He's no Bill Clinton.

Real kicker here is, he is no George W. Bush

[JoltinJoe]

Four years of deficits exceeding a trillion dollars a year -- and not a peep out of this guy about the need to get deficits under control.

He's no Bill Clinton.

Real kicker here is, he is no George W. Bush

So he's better than Bush? Don't know if that's a reason to re-elect him.

[YoUDeeMan]

Real kicker here is, he is no George W. Bush

So he's better than Bush? Don't know if that's a reason to re-elect him.

Wedgie has very low standards that he likes to celebrate with chest thumping regularity.

[Wedgebuster]

So he's better than Bush? Don't know if that's a reason to re-elect him.

Wedgie has very low standards that he likes to celebrate with chest thumping regularity.

I thump birds more regularly by far.

[Cap'n Cat]

Real kicker here is, he is no George W. Bush

So he's better than Bush? Don't know if that's a reason to re-elect him.

It's all non-sensical hate. And, I've seen him mention several times the need to get deficits under control. There is no logical explanation for Obama Hate. He ain't taking any fvcking liberties away. He's trying to do a good job and is succeeding. It's all Conksteria. Race-based Conksteria at that.

SMFH.......


Conks - questions for you: WHY will Romney not win this election as so many of you, yourselves, say? WHY are people telling Santucci to wait until 2016? WHY did Christie or other "better" Conks not run this year?

WHY?

Two possibilities - Obama is doing OK and none of those fucks have either the guts or any other better answers. Their reponse to Obama is to try and ridicule him and lie and exaggerate about him, all veiled barrages at his African Ammerican-ness.

Shame on all of you Conks.

[andy7171]

[youtube][/youtube]

[Wedgebuster]

Dick headed conks are embarrassed for having to stand up for George W Bushtard for eight years, so they naturally lash out and throw temper tantrums when a man of much higher intelligence succeeded him.

They are rightfully embarrassed I agree, but they are still dick heads, and aren't too embarrassed to shoot their mouths off on these boards. Notice none are telling us how much better Bush would have done it, or even how much better McSame/Palin would do things..

What ever happened to all those "one and done" bullshit siggy lines douchies??

Not so sure now, huh?

[Cap'n Cat]

Dick headed conks are embarrassed for having to stand up for George W Bushtard for eight years, so they naturally lash out and throw temper tantrums when a man of much higher intelligence succeeded him.

They are rightfully embarrassed I agree, but they are still dick heads, and aren't too embarrassed to shoot their mouths off on these boards. Notice none are telling us how much better Bush would have done it, or even how much better McSame/Palin would do things..

What ever happened to all those "one and done" bullshit siggy lines douchies??

Not so sure now, huh?

Right on. Obama is doing just fine. And against some pretty steep race-based Conk barriers.

[Ivytalk]

Dick headed conks are embarrassed for having to stand up for George W Bushtard for eight years, so they naturally lash out and throw temper tantrums when a man of much higher intelligence succeeded him.

They are rightfully embarrassed I agree, but they are still dick heads, and aren't too embarrassed to shoot their mouths off on these boards. Notice none are telling us how much better Bush would have done it, or even how much better McSame/Palin would do things..

What ever happened to all those "one and done" bullshit siggy lines douchies??

Not so sure now, huh?

Right on. Obama is doing just fine. And against some pretty steep race-based Conk barriers.

The only folks who drop the N-word on here with any regularity are you and your brother, albeit with the "q" istead of the "g" to dodge the board censors. Very clever.. Give it a rest.

[GannonFan]

Dick headed conks are embarrassed for having to stand up for George W Bushtard for eight years, so they naturally lash out and throw temper tantrums when a man of much higher intelligence succeeded him.

They are rightfully embarrassed I agree, but they are still dick heads, and aren't too embarrassed to shoot their mouths off on these boards. Notice none are telling us how much better Bush would have done it, or even how much better McSame/Palin would do things..

What ever happened to all those "one and done" bullshit siggy lines douchies??

Not so sure now, huh?

Probably went the same place all those "Kerry/Edwards" and "His Fraudelency" bumper stickers went in '04 when donks like you couldn't vote out a clearly vulnerable President after his first term then. Incumbents are hard to beat.

Face it, wedgie, you're not any different than the conks you are railing against here, you and them are pretty much cut from the same cloth - blind partisans that see nothing wrong with the party you support and everything wrong with the party you oppose. You're a political automaton - at least when Cappy does it it doesn't come off as sincere. I think you actually believe what you say.

[JoltinJoe]

President Obama may win re-election and I always hope for the best for the sitting US President.

Nonetheless, I voted for him, and I've been disappointed by his tactics and leadership up to this point.

Worse, Pres. Obama could have been one of the great presidents if he came in during nearly unprecedented economic contraction and rallied the country to turn it around. That's what I expected him to do. Instead, he divided the country by pushing through a divisive national health care bill at a time when such a debate was counter-productive. Whatever your thoughts about national health care, it was a huge political mistake to prioritize it at a time of rampant unemployment and severe economic malaise.

If the President had prioritized the economy, resulting not merely in ending the recession but resulting in growth, he could have then pushed through the health care bill on the wave of his popularity.

Instead, he now barely leads some cartoonish-like characters in national opinion polls in head-to-head presidential match ups.

[SuperHornet]

Skelly is absolutely right on this one. Courts and constitutional principles are a convenience in the conk world.

So who depends more on the courts for social engineering? Donks, that's who!

Exactly. The national Donkeys have been legislating from the bench for decades when they haven't been able to push their cr@p through the normal channels.