I'd rather get a smaller piece of the pie than none at all. It's foolish to pretend the rest of the world doesn't exist and that there aren't other options out there for which to invest and park profits. Choosing not to compete is one of the fastest ways there is to lose.OSBF wrote:fixed for accuracyGannonFan wrote:
Certainly one of the drawbacks of a high corporate tax rate - profits get shuttled to lower tax rate regions and the tax revenue goes un collected.
Coburn proposes $9 trillion deficit cut measure
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19233
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Coburn proposes $9 trillion deficit cut measure
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36401
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Coburn proposes $9 trillion deficit cut measure
This. Wasn't it Reagan who signed onto a tax increase that Congress promised would be 3 dollars in spending cuts for every 1 dollar in tax increases? What we ending up with was tax increases and spending increases.CID1990 wrote:Absolutely. Congress never met a surplus it couldn't figure out a way to spend.AZGrizFan wrote:
Raise SS age - check
cut farm subsidies - check
cut medicare - check
cut student aid - check
cut housing subsidies - check
cut community development grants - check
redesign veteran's benefits - check
close tax loopholes - check
mortgage deduction limitation - check
Now, if he'd add in returning all departments to 2006 spending levels and eliminating HLS, Education, EPA and a host of others, we could accelerate that decade to about 4 years.
I've said all along I'm fine with tax changes if they were in conjunction with REAL cuts. My fear is that congress won't "save" that money, they'll just find some OTHER porkbarrel project to spend it all on and 10 years from now we'll be left with higher taxes AND a $15 trillion deficit.![]()
it is just legalized vote buying.
Coburns plan could pass with 1 trillion in tax increases and 8 trillion in tax cuts, but we would never remotely come close to getting the 8 trillion in spending decreases, if we got them at all, because of the spending whores in Congress.
The ONLY way there should tax increases is an agree for them to kick in once a Balanced Budget Amendment is passed by Congress, signed by the President, and ratified by 3/4 of the states, with the only exception to not having a balanced budget be in time of war limited to when Congress passes a declaration of war.
With the govt currently spending $1 for every 60 cents it takes in the national debt and interest on it will never be paid down significantly without a Balanced Budget Amendment.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Coburn proposes $9 trillion deficit cut measure
Even liberal columnist Margaret Carlson had something good to say about Tom Coburn this week. I wish the Senate had 100 of him.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Coburn proposes $9 trillion deficit cut measure
D1B wrote:Do it. Let's just get it over with so we can all be friends again.


