Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

Post by **Ibanez** » Mon Jun 11, 2018 4:41 pm

HI54UNI wrote:

I might be forgetting my WW2 history here, but what did zee Nazis tell the Japs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:02 pm

Ibanez wrote:
HI54UNI wrote:
I might be forgetting my WW2 history here, but what did zee Nazis tell the Japs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"Well take Europe, you take the Pacific"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **Ibanez** » Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:14 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I might be forgetting my WW2 history here, but what did zee Nazis tell the Japs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Well take Europe, you take the Pacific"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No- I’m honestly not remembering anything aside from the Tripartite Act. The “Pact Of Steel.”

Was there much German-Jap coordination? IIRC, the relationship was strained and deteriorating throughout the 1930s. Or is it something that was relatively minimal, like the British support in the South Pacific?

I wasn’t knocking the picture- just forgetful.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:34 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I might be forgetting my WW2 history here, but what did zee Nazis tell the Japs?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Well take Europe, you take the Pacific"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

* we’ll

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:37 pm

Ibanez wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
"Well take Europe, you take the Pacific"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No- I’m honestly not remembering anything aside from the Tripartite Act. The “Pact Of Steel.”

Was there much German-Jap coordination? IIRC, the relationship was strained and deteriorating throughout the 1930s. Or is it something that was relatively minimal, like the British support in the South Pacific?

I wasn’t knocking the picture- just forgetful.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1941: "Watch out for the Russians"
1945: "Told ya"

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:19 am

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:07 am

#RUSSIA

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Post by **Col Hogan** » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:24 pm

Watch this to the end...

phpBB [video]

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

That guy should be sterilized and kept away from America and its children

Gil Dobie · Post by **Gil Dobie** » Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:36 pm

Gil Dobie · Post by **Gil Dobie** » Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:18 am

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:27 am

Chizzang wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Book it - NC and/or SC are within 5 years of medical marijuana, decriminalization and possibly legalization (that might be within 10). But we are closer today than we ever have been.
I don't doubt the "closer now than ever" part
But people get nervous when it comes time to actually pull the trigger
and RJR will be dropping terrifying advertising bombs in NC and SC when that day arrives

RJR spent 15 million on counter-advertising in Colorado and 30 million in Washington State
Imagine what they'll spend terrifying people in their own back yard

I'm just going to leave this right here for Clitsasaurus...

South Carolina Democrats gave medical marijuana a landslide victory Tuesday, with 82 percent declaring in an advisory vote that doctors should be allowed to prescribe the drug.

The question “Do you support passing a state law allowing doctors to prescribe medical marijuana to patients?” was approved by Democrats in all of the state's 46 counties during Tuesday's primary.

The nonbinding ballot initiative is the latest boost for legalized medical marijuana, which has been embraced by key committees in both the S.C. House and Senate.

state Rep. James Smith of Columbia, co-sponsor of a S.C. House bill allowing medical marijuana, won the Democratic nomination for governor. And John Warren, an Upstate Republican who supports the measure, earned a runoff with Gov. Henry McMaster.

Both Smith and Warren are military combat veterans who support medical marijuana in part as a means for treating veterans suffering from PTSD and other maladies.

http://www.heraldonline.com/news/state/ ... 97154.html

Post by **kalm** » Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:03 am

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:29 pm

kalm wrote:

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 5:17 am

(credit to pols once again)

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:35 am

kalm wrote:

(credit to pols once again)

Actually, we would

DNA testing would only confirm that Joseph wasn’t the father

Unless we had God’s DNA on file

Leave it to the “pro-science” left to get science (and logic) wrong

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:09 am

Your logic is flawed. You're presuming Joseph definitely wasn't the father.

Two Gospels describe of a virgin birth. Two Gospels have no virgin birth and describe Jesus as the son of Joseph.

I read it as a DNA test would confirm Joseph as the father.

Post by **kalm** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:13 am

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:

(credit to pols once again)
Actually, we would

DNA testing would only confirm that Joseph wasn’t the father

Unless we had God’s DNA on file

Leave it to the “pro-science” left to get science (and logic) wrong

What if it proved Joe was the father?

Post by **Col Hogan** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:54 am

Skjellyfetti wrote:Your logic is flawed. You're presuming Joseph definitely wasn't the father.

Two Gospels describe of a virgin birth. Two Gospels have no virgin birth and describe Jesus as the son of Joseph.

I read it as a DNA test would confirm Joseph as the father.

So, the passage that says “Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly...” is just disregarded???

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:05 am

There are different birth narratives. There isn't a unified story.

You can choose to read that passage and disregard the rest. You can choose other passages and disregard the rest. You you can read it as it was supposed to be read, imo: not a literally true.

Post by **Ibanez** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:40 am

Skjellyfetti wrote:Your logic is flawed. You're presuming Joseph definitely wasn't the father.

Two Gospels describe of a virgin birth. Two Gospels have no virgin birth and describe Jesus as the son of Joseph.

I read it as a DNA test would confirm Joseph as the father.

Only Maury can determine paternity with any certainty.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:38 pm

Skjellyfetti wrote:Your logic is flawed. You're presuming Joseph definitely wasn't the father.

Two Gospels describe of a virgin birth. Two Gospels have no virgin birth and describe Jesus as the son of Joseph.

I read it as a DNA test would confirm Joseph as the father.

I'll leave the bible study to you

I've never read it

And if I had, it certainly wouldnt be my basis for determining who I should look for as the father of Haysoose

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:40 pm

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Actually, we would

DNA testing would only confirm that Joseph wasn’t the father

Unless we had God’s DNA on file

Leave it to the “pro-science” left to get science (and logic) wrong
What if it proved Joe was the father?

Then why would Mary have to cook up a story about receiving surprise secks from a ray of light?

We all know she was bonking the pool boy so come off it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:10 pm

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:
What if it proved Joe was the father?
Then why would Mary have to cook up a story about receiving surprise secks from a ray of light?

We all know she was bonking the pool boy so come off it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice save.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums